Following the change in legislation, the JFSC launched a consultation in May of this year, seeking feedback on their proposed notice that will define “senior management functions”. This will determine exactly who is in scope of the new regime and will have the potential to bring previously out of scope employees who perform a “senior management function” within range of civil financial penalties in respect of money laundering breaches.  It is also proposed that the Financial Services Commission (Financial Penalties) (Jersey) Order 2015 is amended to remove penalty caps for legal entities.

Article 1(1) of the Financial Services Commission (Jersey) Law 1998 defines “senior management function” as:

a function designated as such by the Commission by notice published on the Commission’s website where –

(a)   the function requires the individual performing it to be responsible for managing one or more aspects of the registered person’s affairs; and

(b)   those aspects involve, or might involve, a risk of serious consequences –

(i) for the registered person, or

(ii) for business or other interests in Jersey,

and in paragraph (a), managing one or more aspects of the registered person’s affairs includes a reference to taking decisions, or participating in the taking of decisions, about how one or more aspects of those affairs should be carried on.

The JFSC’s proposals acknowledge that whilst the board of a regulated business is the primary focus and ultimately responsible for organising and controlling the firm’s affairs to effectively mitigate money laundering and terrorist financing, senior managers to whom the Board has delegated or apportioned responsibilities should also be able to be held financially accountable for breaches.

The proposals in the consultation for who may be in scope focus on the following 4 categories:

  • Category one – a person who manages any aspect of the firm’s local AML/CFT compliance or risk function, sitting below board level but above key persons. For example: Head of Compliance and/or Risk.
  • Category two – a person whose management function may have an impact on the registered person’s compliance with the MLO or AML/CFT Code of Practice issued by the JFSC. This applies to senior managers sitting below board level who are directly accountable for the performance of the function to the Board or to a principal person. For example: Head of Client On-boarding or Head of Client Relationships.
  • Category three – a person who carries out a duty or responsibility that the MLO or AML/CFT Code of Practice requires to be performed by senior management. For example: those approving continuation of a business relationship with a Politically Exposed Person, or approving a new correspondent banking relationship.
  • Category four – applies to banks only and persons appointed and performing the duties of a ‘senior officer’, under the Banking Business (General Provisions) (Jersey) Order 2002. For example: an off-island officer approving the compliance policy of a Jersey branch.

It is important to note that all categories have the potential to bring into scope senior managers based outside Jersey.  The person’s function, and not their location, will be the determining factor.

The proposals are part of the Jersey Government’s ongoing commitment to combat financial crime and the Island’s response to the recommendations made by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards, especially FATF Recommendation 35, as assessed by MONEYVAL. Under the proposals the existing civil financial penalty caps for registered persons would also be removed and the JFSC could impose penalties on “designated Non-Financial Business and Professions” such as lawyers, accountants, estate agents and casinos, and on their senior management, including principal and key persons. The JFSC anticipates that these amendments will increase the overall effectiveness and proportionality of the existing civil financial penalties regime, whilst providing for fairer and more equitable enforcement action outcomes.

The measures ultimately will extend the JFSC’s reach when it comes to combatting financial crime and holding industry responsible where significant and material breaches and contraventions occur. The JFSC has previously indicated that when considering whether a contravention is “significant and material” it adopts a risk-based approach, and its consideration focuses on the consequences or potential consequences of the contravention. By way of example, when deciding whether a contravention of the MLO should be regarded as “significant and material” the JFSC has suggested that its consideration would include assessing what impact the contravention had on the firm’s ability to adequately manage or mitigate the risk of money laundering.

The consultation closes on Friday 29 July 2022. Do get in touch with your usual Appleby contact should you wish to discuss further.

Key contacts

Andrew Weaver

Partner: Jersey

T +44 (0)1534 818 230
E Email Andrew

Gemma Whale

Counsel: Jersey

T +44 (0)1534 818 163
E Email Gemma

Sarah McDonald

Paralegal: Jersey

T +44 (0)1534 818 270
E Email Sarah

Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More News
7 Apr 2022 | News

Discover 'A Bugs World' with Appleby at Durrell Zoo

Appleby in Jersey are joining forces once more with Durrell to host a brand-new, pop-up insect exhib...

1 Apr 2022 | News

Appleby announces new Partners and Counsel promotions

Appleby announces the promotion of two Partners and the appointment of five lawyers to the position ...

18 Mar 2022 | News

Jersey: Anti-Bribery and Corruption

To combat bribery and corruption, Jersey has enacted domestic legislation known as the Corruption (J...

8 Mar 2022 | News

Appleby Celebrates International Women’s Day on 8 March 2022

Appleby marks the day with 2022 campaign theme #BreakTheBias.

23 Feb 2022 | News

More change proposed to Jersey’s AML regime: are you exempt?

Following a joint consultation launched by the Government of Jersey and the Jersey Financial Service...

Contributors: Gemma Whale, Sarah McDonald
20 Jan 2022 | News

Jersey to modernise its Limited Partnership legislation

Consultation is currently underway in Jersey in relation to the proposed amendment of the Limited Pa...

13 Dec 2021 | News

Appleby support PraxisIFM Group Limited on completion of sale of funds business to Sanne Group plc

Leading offshore law firm Appleby acted as lead counsel to TISE listed PraxisIFM Group Limited (Prax...

27 Oct 2021 | News

Improved Access to Capital Markets for Jersey Companies

On 19 October 2021, the definition of a “prospectus” under Jersey company law was narrowed by th...

Contributors: Paul Worsnop
26 Oct 2021 | News

Recognition for Appleby Lawyers in the 2022 Chambers and Partners Guide

The Directory recognises 20 Appleby Lawyers from their Guernsey, Isle of Man and Jersey offices.

Contributors: James Gaudin