Offshore Fund Disputes Lawyers

When it comes to navigating the intricate landscape of investment fund disputes, our dedicated fund disputes lawyers are renowned for their expertise and experience, having acted in a number of high-profile global cases in recent years. Appleby provides offshore fund disputes legal services in Cayman Islands, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Isle of Man, Guernsey, Jersey and Mauritius. We can also call on our experienced Funds & Investment Services team to provide further technical advice.

Offshore fund disputes

Arising from factors such as trading losses, illiquidity, misevaluation and mismanagement, fund-related disputes are a common feature of the international commercial landscape. Complex by nature, funds experiencing distress require a team of dedicated fund dispute lawyers who are well rehearsed in this specialist area to resolve them.

An offshore fund dispute can often include multiple parties, intricate contractual agreements, intricate financial structures, and regulatory considerations. Navigating through such complexities requires specialised offshore fund disputes knowledge and experience in both investment funds law and dispute resolution.

Fund dispute lawyers

Appleby’s Fund Disputes team is an industry leader, being one of the few offshore firms to field a specialist team dealing with fund disputes, and having been involved in a number of high-profile offshore fund disputes proceedings. Our team of highly skilled and talented fund disputes lawyers have experience that covers all types of funds, including corporate funds, limited partnerships, unit trusts, regulated mutual funds, closed-ended funds and private equity funds.

We act for a wide range of parties involved in fund-related matters, including office-holders, directors, auditors, investment managers, shareholders and creditors.

We regularly provide advice and assistance regarding matters such as:

  • Redemption issues
  • Shareholders’ rights
  • Directors’ liabilities
  • Enforceability of side letters
  • Disputes between service providers
  • Valuation issues
  • Fraud and mismanagement of fund assets
  • Restructuring distressed funds
  • Winding up and dissolution of insolvent funds

Client experience

Representative Work

Advising and representing liquidators

Advising and representing the liquidators in relation to their actions to recover losses for investors who lost US$1.5 billion in the collapse of Bear Stearns subprime-invested hedge fund, the largest and highest-profile hedge fund collapse arising out of the subprime mortgage crisis

Acting for Phoenix Meridian Equity Ltd.

Acting for Phoenix Meridian Equity Ltd. in the first Cayman Islands case on misvaluation to go to trial, raising unprecedented issues about construction of fund investment documentation, and the obligation of funds to disclose underlying hedging transaction costs to investors

Advising Gottex Fund Management Sarl

Advising Gottex Fund Management Sarl on its attempt to redeem a US$40 million investment in CPIM Structured Credit Fund and its challenge through the Cayman Islands Court of the fund’s retrospective imposition of a ‘gate’ on its redemption notice to block the payment of redemption proceeds.

Spotlight

Cayman fund disputes

Our Cayman Islands office provides specialist Cayman fund disputes legal advice. With decades of experience between them, our fund disputes lawyers in Cayman are experts in navigating the complex nature of funds experiencing distress. Indeed, their Cayman fund dispute expertise was highlighted in the latest edition of The Legal 500 Caribbean legal directory, with researchers noting that “Appleby’s ‘excellent strength across the whole team’ ensures that it is sought out by a stellar line-up of international corporate clients for representation in high-stakes fund disputes, winding-up proceedings, and contractual enforcement matters”.

More news
Website-Code-BVI
25 May 2026

Back to Basics- Disputes Series

COMPELLING THE INNOCENT: NORWICH PHARMACAL RELIEF IN THE BVI Norwich Pharmacal relief can be a key, strategic tool to assist litigants with early-stage investigation where a BVI company is involved in “wrongdoing” that is the subject of ongoing or prospective litigation either in the BVI or abroad.  A Norwich Pharmacal disclosure order in the BVI is typically made against the registered agent of a “wrongdoer” BVI company, unbeknownst to the company itself, compelling the registered agent to provide information and documentation on the company’s directors, shareholders, ultimate beneficial owners and/or assets.  It is a flexible remedy but it typically enables an applicant party to obtain disclosure to identify the protagonists controlling the “wrongdoer” BVI company and details of its assets necessary in order to pursue their claim or to enforce and execute a judgment. Most frequently, relief is given in aid of foreign proceedings where it is needed to properly plead out a potential claim, to support eventual enforcement of a foreign judgment and/or to obtain or police an injunction.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
14 May 2026

Arbitrating shareholders’ disputes and beyond – the Mauritian Supreme Court re-affirms its non-interventionist and pro-arbitration stance

On 08 May 2026, the Mauritian Supreme Court, sitting as the panel of Designated Judges appointed under the International Arbitration Act 2008 (IAA), delivered an important judgment in Intermediate Investment Holdings Ltd v Imevbore & Ors 2026 SCJ 186 (IIHL Case). The Supreme Court declined to award costs sought by the Respondents following the Applicant’s withdrawal of an application for an interim injunction.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
28 Apr 2026

The Interplay Between Supervision Applications and Winding Up on the Just and Equitable Ground: Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC

In its recent judgment in Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC [2026] CIGC (FSD) 19, the Grand Court considered itself bound to make a supervision order pursuant to s.131(b) of the Companies Act, notwithstanding that the company was the subject of a pending just and equitable winding up (J&E) petition when its voluntary liquidation was commenced; and rejected an attack on the joint voluntary liquidators’ (JVLs) independence, which was principally based on a misreading of the JVLs’ evidence and lacked any objective foundation. The authors, who successfully represented the JVLs in obtaining the supervision order, discuss this important judgment further below – which is believed to be the first decision on the interplay between supervision applications and J&E proceedings under the Companies Act – and offer their views on the guidance that shareholders petitioning on the just and equitable ground may derive from it in future cases.  The challenge to the JVLs’ independence was rejected on the well-established principles which Doyle J discussed in Re Global Fidelity Bank [2021] 2 CILR 361, and is not discussed in further detail below.

Appleby-Website-BVI1
27 Apr 2026

Back to Basics - Dispute Series

Winding-Up Petitions in the BVI – A Practical Guide For Creditors Applying to appoint a BVI liquidator is one of the most cost effective and efficient tools available to creditors who want to recover debts or liabilities from BVI companies and is often a go-to strategy where simpler methods of debt collection have failed. Once appointed, a liquidator has a broad range of immediate powers including the ability to take possession and control of all of the company’s assets. In this guide, we highlight the process and the key principles for creditors to consider prior to and during the liquidator appointment process.