Regulatory Disputes Lawyers

Our expert team of regulatory disputes lawyers provides advice to clients preparing for any interaction with regulators or addressing any exposure to civil, criminal and administrative sanctions across a wide range of business activities.

Regulatory disputes law firm

The market represents a critical cog in the workings of the global financial system, and as such finds itself the focus of a fast-evolving regulatory regime. In an environment where regulation continues to become more and more demanding, we specialise in advising major financial institutions, global corporations, professional and public bodies on all aspects of regulatory investigations and disputes.

Our global presence enables us to provide comprehensive, multijurisdictional legal advice at the times most critical to our clients who we help with strategic counsel to navigate the complexities of the various regulatory challenges they are faced with.

Our team of seasoned regulatory disputes lawyers can be trusted for unparalleled expertise in regulatory disputes, ensuring optimal resolutions. A regulatory disputes lawyer at Appleby is able to provide expert advice across a wide range of business regulation, including:

  • Anti-money laundering
  • Anti-bribery & corruption
  • Competition law
  • Data protection
  • eGaming
  • Financial services regulation
  • Sanctions and export controls

Commercial regulatory disputes

As a leading international law firm, we specialise in a comprehensive range of services tailored for commercial regulatory disputes. Our highly adept team of offshore lawyers possesses extensive commercial expertise in navigating the intricacies of regulatory disputes and providing strategic advice to safeguard our clients’ interests. From proactive compliance strategies to dispute resolution, Appleby offers a full spectrum of legal services that address the dynamic regulatory and economic landscape.

Our commitment to excellence ensures clients receive tailored solution for their specific needs. Whether you need the advice and support of a regulatory disputes lawyer for guidance on commercial compliance or require Court representation, our firm is dedicated to delivering legal proficiency and client-focused advocacy in the specialist field of commercial regulatory disputes.

SPOTLIGHT

Regulatory disputes Jersey

With a deep understanding of the island’s legal landscape, our regulatory disputes Jersey team regularly supports clients through complex regulatory challenges. Recognised by The Legal 500 as a “well-established Jersey law firm in all the big cases”, we can provide tailored counsel to businesses, financial institutions, and corporations facing regulatory disputes in Jersey.

Our Jersey regulatory dispute lawyers are able to combine global insight from our nine other international locations with local expertise for optimal outcomes.

Our Experts
  • All
  • Mauritius (2)
  • Guernsey (5)
  • Isle of Man (3)
  • Cayman Islands (1)
  • Hong Kong (2)
  • Jersey (1)
  • Bermuda (3)
  • BVI (1)
More news
Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
10 Sep 2026

AI in the Workplace: Emerging Legal Issues for Bermuda Employers

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming part of the modern workplace. It has moved quickly from being an experimental technology to an everyday business tool. Employers are already using AI to draft job advertisements, screen applications, assess candidates, analyse employee performance, monitor productivity and assist with disciplinary and termination decisions. For employers, the attraction is obvious. AI can process large quantities of information quickly, identify patterns and perform tasks that previously required significant human resources. But such widespread application of AI is also giving rise to legal risk as regulators and courts around the world consider what happens when an employment decision is made, or materially influenced, by an algorithm. It is a question that is likely to become increasingly relevant in Bermuda, as the law necessarily catches up with the technology.

Technology-and-Innovation-1024x576
7 Sep 2026

AI in Risk and Compliance: Mind the Expectation Gap

Appleby Partner Simon Florance explores the use of AI in risk and compliance.

Website-Code-BVI-1
26 Aug 2026

BVI Court Prevents BVI Company from Redomiciling to Preserve Enforcement Against its Shares

In our article published on 14 November 2025 we addressed an interesting case in which the Court appointed a liquidator to a foreign dissolved company, titled “BVI Court Appoints Liquidators to Foreign Dissolved Company”.  That article referenced a further, related, 2-day hearing that was heard and ultimately determined earlier in the year (on 6 May 2025) in which the Claimants sought to prevent a BVI company from re-domiciling itself to Palestine (the Re-domiciliation Application). This article summarises the key aspects of those Applications.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
13 Aug 2026

Restructurings Frustrating Creditors And The Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards: The English High Court's Decision In State Oil Company Of Azerbaijan v Mansimov

The English High Court has issued a significant judgment on the enforcement of arbitral awards, the reach of section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the limits of the Marex tort, with potential relevance to the Cayman Islands' Fraudulent Dispositions Act.

Website-Code-BVI-2
6 Aug 2026

The Rights of Sanctioned Litigants to access to the Court: Court of Appeal issues Key Decision in the BVI

The Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal has delivered a significant judgment in AO Alfa-Bank v Kipford Ventures Limited, overturning a stay of proceedings and reinstating a US$142 million freezing injunction. The decision provides important guidance on access to justice, sanctions, and interim relief in the BVI.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
5 Aug 2026

Good faith in action, not just belief: the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa and its significance in the Cayman Islands

May a company director depart from a strategy his board has agreed, in the sincere belief that he knows a better route to the company’s success? In Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa [2026] UKSC 21, the Supreme Court held that, whatever the answer, a director cannot pursue his own strategy by concealing it from, and misleading, his fellow directors. The Court confirmed that the good faith duty is not confined to a director’s sincerely held view of the company’s best interests; it also governs the means by which the director acts. The decision is an authoritative statement of the content of the fiduciary duty of loyalty, and is likely to be influential in the Cayman Islands. The decision will interest directors, those who advise or appoint them, and stakeholders affected by directors’ conduct.