Section 20 of the Financial Services Act 2007 (FSA) lists the criteria that the Commission may have to regard when considering whether a person is a “fit and proper person” and these include their “ability to perform the relevant functions properly, efficiently, honestly and fairly” and their “reputation, character, financial integrity and reliability”.

Being “fit and proper” means an applicant and/or licensee is, on the balance of probabilities, competent and capable of carrying out business in a manner that is both honest and correct.

Application of the Guide

The Guide is applicable to the following non-exhaustive list of persons:

  • any shareholder of the applicant and/or licensee;
  • any beneficial owner of the applicant and/or licensee;
  • any director of the applicant and/or licensee;
  • any officer of the applicant and/or licensee;
  • any representative or agents of the applicant and/or licensee; and
  • any such person as may be determined by the Commission.

The applicant and/or licensee has to satisfy an initial test and is required to thereafter act in a “fit and proper” manner on an on-going basis in relation to both its business with the Commission and with its clients.  Pursuant to the Guide, the test shall be applied on the basis of the Commission’s perception of the risk posed by Relevant Persons who are connected to the licensee and/or applicant and who are involved in providing financial advice or financial services or any activity that places them in control of clients’ assets, including money.

“Relevant Persons” are:

  • Officer(s);
  • beneficial owner(s) of the applicant/licensee;
  • any person who is to be employed by, or associated with the applicant/licensee;
  • any agent or representative of the applicant/licensee;
  • the officer(s);
  • any shareholder of the applicants/licensees;
  • the related corporations of the applicant/licensee and the officers(s) of those related corporations.

The Commission’s approach is a cumulative one, that is, it may conclude that a licensee and/or applicant has not met the “fit and propriety” test by considering various cumulative facts and circumstances, each of which on its own would not have led the Commission to determine a lack of fitness and propriety.

Where any of the provisions of the Guide are breached, the Commission is empowered to decide whether those involved continue to satisfy the “fitness and propriety” test. Failure to satisfy the “fitness and propriety” test shall mean that a person shall not be able to act or continue to act for a licensee.  Further, in the event the Commission reaches the conclusion that an officer of a licensee has not satisfied the “fit and propriety” test, it may, pursuant to section 24(7) of the FSA Act, after giving such officer and the licensee an opportunity to make representations, direct the licensee to remove such officer.

Criteria for assessing Fitness and Propriety

In concluding whether the test was satisfied, the Commission shall apply a ‘balance of probabilities’ standard and shall on a best endeavors basis, assess all relevant evidence, irrespective of whether it is classed as positive or negative, including but not limited to changes in key relationships such as auditors and bankers and may enquire about the reasons for such changes.

The criteria for assessment of “fit and proper” are as follows:

  • Honesty, integrity, diligence, fairness, reputation and good character;
  • Competence and capability; and
  • Financial soundness.

In introducing the revised guidelines to the “fit and propriety” test, the Commission seeks not only to establish an international benchmark for licensing and for ongoing regulation of licensees and/or applicants but also to, inter alia, protect the interests of investors by deterring dishonest, incompetent, unskilled or otherwise inappropriate operators in Mauritius and to encourage high standards of conduct within the financial markets of Mauritius.  It is to be noted that the FSA Act empowers the Commission to reassess the fitness and propriety of any licensee and to accordingly take measures based on the assessment, should the need so arise.

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More News
6 Jun 2023 | News

''To dare and to care'' - The Mauritian National Budget 2023-2024

On 02 June 2023, the Minister of Finance, Economic Planning and Development (Minister of Finance) ta...

5 Jun 2023 | News

Appleby marks World Environment Day with sustainability commitment

Appleby is proud to announce on World Environment Day that it is furthering its sustainability commi...

1 Jun 2023 | News

Appleby supporting LGBTQ+ Pride Month 2023

As a law firm committed to promoting diversity, equity and inclusion, Appleby is proud to support th...

17 Apr 2023 | News

Appleby Lawyers recognised in Legal 500 Europe, Middle East & Africa Rankings 2023

Appleby has retained its leading Tier 1 position in the latest edition of The Legal 500 Europe, Midd...

31 Mar 2023 | News

Appleby announces Partner and Counsel promotions

Appleby has promoted four lawyers to Partner and eight to Counsel across its Bermuda, British Virgin...

8 Mar 2023 | News

Appleby supports International Women's Day 2023

Appleby is proud to support International Women’s Day (IWD) and this year’s campaign theme of #E...

16 Feb 2023 | News

Top tier rankings for Appleby in Chambers Global 2023

Twenty-eight lawyers from across Appleby’s Bermuda, British Virgin Islands (BVI), Cayman Islands, ...

1 Feb 2023 | News

Appleby provides offshore perspective on fund finance laws and regulations in 2023

Fund finance specialists from Appleby have authored the jurisdictional chapters for Bermuda, the Bri...

25 Oct 2022 | News

Appleby leads on six jurisdictional chapters for Legal 500’s latest Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) guide

Appleby has authored the chapters for Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Guern...

11 Aug 2022 | News

Over 30 Appleby lawyers and nine offices recognised in 2022 IFLR1000

36 Appleby lawyers across nine jurisdictions have been recognised in this year’s IFLR1000 rankings...