Back to Basics- Disputes Series

Published: 2 Feb 2026

Foreign Officeholders in the British Virgin Islands – Recognition or Assistance?

  • In the context of cross-border insolvency, it is important to distinguish between the two concepts:

o    “Recognition”, being the formal act of the BVI court recognising a foreign representative as having status in the BVI; and​​​

o    “Assistance” from the BVI Court which grants power to the foreign representative​​​ to actually deal with BVI assets and access to a wide range of statutory relief.

  • In many jurisdictions, statutory schemes exist to marry those two concepts together and provide a complete package by which assistance in foreign insolvency proceedings is rendered.  In the BVI, things are less straightforward as (i) the BVI has not adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and (ii) Part XVIII of the BVI Insolvency Act 2003 (Cross-Border Insolvency), based on the Model Law, has not come into effect.
  •  As a consequence, assistance from the BVI Court does not necessarily follow recognition unless the foreign officeholder was appointed in a designated “relevant foreign country”.  Fortunately, BVI’s flexible regime provides some options to foreign officeholders from non-designated jurisdictions where statutory assistance under the Insolvency Act is not available.
Primary Contact

Olwyn Barry

Group Partner: BVI

T +44 (0)1534 818 357 or + 1 (284) 393 5345
E [email protected]


Statutory Assistance – Designated Jurisdictions

  • The ability of a foreign officeholder such as a receiver, liquidator or bankruptcy trustee to obtain recognition of his appointment together with assistance from the courts in the British Virgin Islands is largely determined by (i) the nature of their appointment in the foreign jurisdiction[1], and (ii) whether they were appointed in proceedings of a “relevant foreign country”.
  • The BVI Financial Services Commission has designated the jurisdictions that are a “relevant foreign country” [2] for the purposes of Part XIX ​of the Insolvency Act 2003 (Orders in Aid of Foreign Proceedings).
  • Foreign officeholders appointed in the context of collective insolvency proceedings in a designated relevant foreign country, can apply for wide-ranging assistance from the BVI Court under Part XIX of the Insolvency Act for orders in aid of the foreign proceedings, including:

o    orders for delivery up to the officeholder of the assets of the debtor;

o    anti-suit injunctions to restrain proceedings against the debtor or his property;

o    appointment of interim receivers over BVI assets of the debtor;

o    examination orders; and

o    orders restraining the exercise or enforcement of any right or remedy over the debtor’s property.

  • The Court has a wide discretion to order such other relief as it deems appropriate.
  • Foreign officeholders will only have standing to apply for assistance under Part XIX of the Insolvency Act where they are appointed in foreign proceedings pursuant to a law relating to insolvency: section 466 the Insolvency Act.  This excludes other officeholders, for example a receiver appointed under Proceeds of Criminal Conduct legislation seeking to deal with BVI assets. Different considerations apply to such officeholders.

Common Law Recognition – Non-Designated Jurisdictions

  • Where an officeholder is not appointed in a relevant foreign country, the officeholder cannot obtain assistance from the BVI Court under the statutory regime: Net International Property Limited v Adv. Eitan Erez (BVIHCMAP2010/0010). They may, however, apply under common law for recognition of their status as a foreign insolvency officeholder in the BVI but such recognition does not amount to entitlement to seek orders for assistance under Part XIX. Accordingly, assistance at common law is not available in the BVI.

Other Practical Routes to Assistance​​

  • Foreign officeholders from non-designated countries who do not have standing to apply for assistance under Part XIX will need to explore other routes.  Such options may include letters of request pursuant to the provisions of the Evidence (Proceedings in Foreign Jurisdictions) Act or the instigation of parallel insolvency proceedings in the BVI with the appointment of an overseas practitioner alongside a BVI Insolvency Practitioner.
  • The BVI Court is a signatory to the Judicial Insolvency Network guidelines, which provide a ‘best practice’ approach ​​aimed at assisting co-operation between parties and communication between Judges supervising cross-border insolvency proceedings.

[1] The statutory and common law position outlined relates only to foreign officeholders appointed in the context of insolvency.
[2] Australia, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, Canada, Cayman Islands, Finland, Guernsey, Guyana, Hong Kong, Ireland, Isle of Man, Jamaica, Japan, Jersey, New Zealand, Nigeria, Singapore, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos, United Kingdom, USA, and Member States and Territories of the Organisation of the Eastern Caribbean States (i.e., Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Montserrat, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia and St Vincent and the Grenadines).

 

Share
More publications
The Global Website header
27 Feb 2026

The Global - Insights In Review

The Global sees us share updates and insights from across our network of international offices on the latest legislative news, trends or developments impacting the corporate sector.

Appleby-Website-BVI1
12 Nov 2025

Back to Basics - Disputes Series

Statutory Demands in the BVI - Serve or Swerve? A statutory demand is a familiar feature of insolvency processes across the world, and the BVI is no different. In theory, a statutory demand can be a useful tool used by a creditor to force a company to either pay an outstanding debt, or run the risk of liquidation.

The Global Website header
27 Oct 2025

The Global - 2025 Q3 Review

The Global sees us share updates and insights from across our network of international offices on the latest legislative news, trends or developments impacting the corporate sector.

The Global Website header
5 Aug 2025

The Global - 2025 Q2 Review

The Global sees us share updates and insights from across our network of international offices on the latest legislative news, trends or developments impacting the corporate sector.

The Global Website header
7 Apr 2025

The Global - 2025 Q1 Review

The Global sees us share updates and insights from across our network of international offices on the latest legislative news, trends or developments impacting the corporate sector.

The Global Website header
9 Jan 2025

The Global - 2024 Q4 Review

The Global sees us share updates and insights from across our network of international offices on the latest legislative news, trends or developments impacting the corporate sector.

The Global Website header
7 Oct 2024

The Global - 2024 Q3 Review

The Global sees us share updates and insights from across our network of international offices on the latest legislative news, trends or developments impacting the corporate sector.

The Global Website header
8 Jul 2024

The Global - 2024 Q2 Review

The Global sees us share updates and insights from across our network of international offices on the latest legislative news, trends or developments impacting the corporate sector.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
19 Jun 2024

Where Public Policy Collides: Arbitration v. Insolvency

In an important decision which is likely to be widely cited, and to have significant ramifications for practice in the English Companies Court, the Privy Council has today decided that the decision of the English Court of Appeal in Salford Estates (No 2) v. Altomart was wrongly decided: Sian Participation Corp v. Halimeda [2024] UKPC 16. Privy Council decisions are usually only of persuasive effect in England, but the Board has, for the first time, issued a Willers v. Joyce direction to the effect that Salford is no longer to be followed in England.

The Global Website header
9 Apr 2024

The Global - 2024 Q1 Review

The Global sees us share updates and insights from across our network of international offices on the latest legislative news, trends or developments impacting the corporate sector.