Having unanimously allowed the appeal by an oil tycoon’s former wife and ordered him to hand over assets held by his companies, the Supreme Court has not ‘pierced the corporate veil’ as some reported but has clarified the treatment of company assets in divorce cases.

The case first came before Mr Justice Moylan in 2011, who awarded Yasmin Prest a lump sum of £17.5m. Finding that the husband’s companies were “effectively … the husband’s money box which he uses at will” and consequently he was ‘entitled’ to their assets for the purposes of divorce proceedings, the judge ordered Mr Prest to procure the transfer of several UK properties held by his companies to his wife in partial satisfaction of the lump sum order. He did so because although the properties were in the UK, the companies which held them were offshore. Consequently, while he could not effectively police an order for the transfer of shares, he could enforce an order for the transfer of the properties.

That ruling was overturned on appeal in October 2012 on the basis that as the companies are separate legal entities, their assets were sacrosanct. As Mr Prest was not ‘entitled’ to them, the court had no power to order their transfer in satisfaction of his obligations to his wife. The ruling divided the Court of Appeal bench two to one, with commercial judges Lord Justice Patten and Lord Justice Rimer finding in favour of the companies. Lord Justice Rimer stated that “the properties were part of the assets of, and belonged beneficially to, the companies that respectively controlled them” and consequently in the absence of dishonesty or fraud, the ‘corporate veil’ could not be pierced by the court in order to satisfy Mrs Prest’s award. Lord Justice Thorpe, the only Family Division judge sitting, warned in his dissenting judgment that if the law permitted Mr Prest to retain assets in this way “it defeats the Family Division judge’s overriding duty to achieve a fair result” and the decision presented “an open road and a fast car” to the economically powerful who seek to avoid their spouse’s claims on divorce.

The ruling represented a radical departure from previous principles in Family Law, described by Lord Justice Patten as “an approach to company owned assets … which amounts almost to a separate system of legal rules unaffected by the relevant principles of English property and company law”. A further appeal to the Supreme Court was essential to address this conflict between the Commercial and Family Courts.

In the Supreme Court, Lord Sumption reaffirmed that the separate legal personality of a company cannot be disregarded unless it was being abused for a purpose that was in some relevant respect improper.





Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
27 Sep 2022

Similar but Different

While the basic features of the trust remain, there are some notable differences in how trusts can b...

1 Aug 2022

Register of Overseas Entities: A Jersey perspective

The Register of Overseas Entities at Companies House (ROE), as contemplated by the Economic Crime (T...

30 Jun 2022

Digital Identification in Jersey

There have been considerable changes made to the way we do business in recent times. These changes w...

Contributors: Gemma Whale, Paul Worsnop
17 Jun 2022

Proposals to amend the Powers of Attorney (Jersey) Law 1995

Following the recent update from our Guernsey colleagues on the introduction of lasting or enduring ...

Contributors: Gemma Whale
9 Jun 2022

Trustee Knowledge Series: Masters Paper Two: Family Governance

Appleby Private Client & Trust Partner David Dorgan has authored and distributed a series of Tru...

17 May 2022

Navigating the Jersey M&A landscape (3 of 3)

This is the third of a series of three articles, each dealing with topics to be considered when buyi...

Contributors: Andrew Weaver
5 May 2022

The Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022: a Jersey perspective

The new Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act received Royal Assent on 15 March 2022 (th...

Contributors: Andrew Weaver, Gemma Whale
21 Apr 2022

Listing Private Equity Acquisition Debt on The International Stock Exchange

This article provides a summary of Appleby listing agent services in the Channel Islands, and also o...

12 Apr 2022

Trustee Knowledge Series: Masters Paper One: PTC Structures

Appleby Private Client & Trust Partner David Dorgan has authored and distributed a series of Tru...

16 Mar 2022

Trustee Knowledge Series: Advanced Paper Eight: Amending Mistakes

It is almost inevitable that during the life of most trusts (which can now last indefinitely in many...