It is certainly unlikely. In addition to the low probability of identifying a potential unicorn, there are also protections for investors which make it difficult for start-up companies to offer their shares for sale to the general public. Traditionally, this has resulted in funding primarily from venture capitalists, business angels and, more latterly, private equity houses. Private equity investment is typically limited to high-net worth individuals, banks, pension funds and other institutional investors.

Investing in retail tech funds is an option for an average investor, thereby gaining the direct benefit of an investment manager’s expertise and indirect exposure to a basket of potential “multibaggers”. However, this approach also has its downsides. The investment also has to bear the cost of a regulated fund structure. In addition, the very nature of a retail fund structure with a requirement for high levels of liquidity is fundamentally at odds with the idea of investing in early stage, high-growth, difficult to value investments.

So, given the challenges facing the average would-be investor, has technology also provided the solution to early-stage investing?

Crowdfunding is a relatively recent innovation whereby equity in a business is offered to the public via an online platform and participants typically invest relatively small amounts of cash. However, whilst these platforms do occasionally provide the potential for outside returns, the due diligence on new ventures can be very limited, and there is also the risk of identity theft and fraud. It is arguable that some of the most effective crowdfunding innovations have actually been those where the participants themselves have a personal or vested interest in the project, or which have a reward-based outcome rather than financial gain. For example, Kickstarter turns 10 years old this year and has found success with its combination of reward-based returns with an altruistic flavour.

The initial coin offering or ICO is another innovation which can be viewed as an attempt to democratise the way in which an average investor can invest in tech start-ups. A company looking to create a new coin, application or service will launch an ICO which can cover a multitude of concepts and evolve from the offerings of decentralised virtual currencies such as Bitcoin.

ICOs can offer outsize returns but carry significant risks. Their decentralised nature makes it difficult to comply with applicable anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation. They are also vulnerable to speculation, volatility, fraud and theft.

In Guernsey, the Guernsey Financial Services Commission (GFSC) promotes the highest standards of compliance and probity and has sounded a note of caution in relation to virtual currencies and ICOs. Along with a number of other regulators, it has noted the risks associated with some offerings, in particular those targeted at retail investors. Whilst the GFSC remains committed to innovation, it has concerns in relation to exchanges, volatility and the secondary market for coins.

This is consistent with the position adopted by a number of other regulators and reflects the focus on protecting investors and on AML/CFT risk. That said, for those able to demonstrate that appropriate controls are in place, the GFSC has indicated that the door is open.

All in all, whilst technology and the internet can assist in the creation and promotion of a new project or idea, facilitate the transfer of data to assist with due diligence, and provide seamless new ways of value transfer, the fundamental tensions will always still exist between risk and reward, and investor protection and opportunity.

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
1 Jul 2019 |

Guernsey Bailiffs Past and Present

It has been confirmed that the Bailiff of Guernsey, Sir Richard Collas, will retire in May 2020 and ...

Contributors: Lisa Upham
28 Jun 2019 |

Internal Investigations - Evidence for the Prosecution

Sophisticated organisations are frequently required to undertake internal investigations. These can ...

Contributors: Anthony Williams
26 Jun 2019 |

Regulatory Headwinds

Faced with increased scrutiny from regulators on both global and jurisdictional levels, businesses m...

Contributors: David Dorgan
19 Jun 2019 |

Beneficial Ownership Update: Crown Dependencies

The Crown Dependencies (Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man) have announced a joint policy commitme...

Contributors: Alison MacKrill, Caren Pegg
4 Jun 2019 |

Trusts: Lessons from Dickens but a modern story

Trusts to benefit beneficiaries are established for many reasons but generally are a way of protecti...

1 Jun 2019 |

A Substantial Undertaking: Thoughts for Trustees

Relevant jurisdictions were required to address the EU Code of Conduct Group’s concerns about ‘e...

30 May 2019 |

Data Protection’s Anniversary Gift

It is traditional for a paper-based item to be presented on a first anniversary, so what better way ...

23 May 2019 |

Data Protection and Cyber Security one year on

Approaching the one year anniversary of Guernsey’s new data protection legislation and the end of ...

Contributors: Richard Sheldon
21 May 2019 |

Royal Court of Jersey Directs the Winding up of an Insolvent Trust

The Royal Court of Jersey has recently handed down an important decision in relation to the winding ...

Contributors: Amy Benest