Institutional landlords are feeling downward pressure on like-for-like net rental income and property values, generally resulting from a higher level of administrations and company voluntary arrangements (“CVAs”) as retailers struggle to adapt to an evolving marketplace.

These are exceptionally tough times for retailers. Online shopping has long been in the ascendancy, crippling business rates add to the strain. Consumer spending remains tight, as recent Christmas trading updates have shown.  All of this ultimately impacts valuations of the landlord’s asset.

As this trend continues, retail tenants are becoming more commercially astute, rethinking traditional leasing arrangements. It has recently been reported that retail tenants, such as Hotel Chocloat, are pushing for terms to be negotiated such that, if a neighbouring tenant benefits from rent reduction as part of an approved CVA, they will also have their rent reduced to the same level – refusing to be penalised for being successful and subsidise the rent cuts for less successful rivals.

Retailers are looking for more flexibility when signing leases, with more break clauses and less commitment to the future. This is at odds with the landlord’s desire for stable revenue streams and more importantly, certainty of value. Retail casualties and empty retail units are forcing owners of shopping centres, retail parks and other large property portfolios to consider restructuring their investments – be that via refinancing or realisation.

Many investment properties of this nature are held in tax neutral structures such as Jersey property unit trusts, Guernsey property unit trusts and passive holding vehicles and at Appleby, we are well positioned to advised lenders and landlords alike on such arrangements.

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
8 Mar 2021 |

Appleby Celebrates International Women’s Day

International Women’s Day is celebrated annually in support of gender equality and equal participa...

2 Mar 2021 |

KBR and the Serious Fraud Office – should offshore companies and corporate providers still worry about a knock at the door from the SFO?

At first sight, the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in R (on the application of KBR Inc) v D...

2 Mar 2021 |

Listing Private Equity Acquisition Debt on The International Stock Exchange

The purpose of this article is to provide a high level understanding of Appleby listing agent servic...

Contributors: Chris Smedley
24 Feb 2021 |

Fintech: advancing economies in Africa

In this article we explore the rapidly evolving African FinTech industry.

Contributors: Lebogang Maimane
23 Feb 2021 |

Fit and Proper in the Channel Islands – A Regulatory Enforcement Update

It is sometimes easy to forget with all that has happened over the last 12 months that there was a w...

4 Feb 2021 |

GBP 2million fine for contempt of Court: The Jersey Royal Court issues stark warning to litigants

The Jersey Court has shown that it continues to expect, and if necessary will demand, compliance wit...

Contributors: Amy Benest
9 Dec 2020 |

Jersey Propco structures: still a strong foundation

First Published in Jersey First for Finance, December 2020

Contributors: David Dorgan, Daniel Healy
3 Dec 2020 |

Objectively speaking – Jersey confirms its stance on contractual formation

A recent decision of the Royal Court has held that, when determining whether or not parties have con...