Offshore Insolvency & Restructuring Lawyers

Our expert offshore insolvency & restructuring lawyers advise financially distressed companies, directors, institutional lenders, funds, bond holders, trustees, creditors (secured or unsecured), borrowers, onshore law firms and insolvency practitioners in large insolvencies and restructurings that have offshore or cross-border elements.

What is insolvency and what is restructuring?

Insolvency and restructuring refer to the legal processes and strategies employed when a business is facing financial or operational difficulties or both. Insolvency involves a company’s inability to pay its debts, while restructuring focuses on implementing changes to improve financial stability and operations, aiming to prevent formal insolvency or facilitate recovery.

Insolvencies may be corporate or personal. They may be triggered by macro-economic factors or by factors specific to an industry, sector or individual business or person. Corporate entities may require restructuring whether or not they are insolvent. A restructuring differs from a formal insolvency (known as a company’s liquidation or winding up or bankruptcy if an individual). A formal insolvency is aimed at liquidating assets to distribute the proceeds amongst creditors. The process will generally result in a company’s business operations terminating and the company ultimately ceasing to exist. A solvent restructuring may be required as a result of a take-over, merger, revision of business strategy or change to regulatory requirements In an insolvency scenario, restructuring is a process by which a company under financial distress develops and implements a plan that allows the company to improve its financial position, with the ultimate goal of continuing its business operations. A restructuring can be achieved through an in-court or out-of-court process.

Our team has extensive insolvency and restructuring experience across a wide range of industries, including retail, hospitality and leisure, healthcare, financial services, real estate, oil & gas and manufacturing.

Offshore insolvency lawyers

We provide clear, sound and timely advice on the full spectrum of contentious and non-contentious insolvencies and restructurings. Our global presence enables us to provide comprehensive, multijurisdictional legal advice at the times most critical to our clients.

Our team of insolvency and restructuring lawyers are experts in advising on all aspects of the law, including:

  • Directors and other fiduciaries, including trustees, on their duties and personal exposure
  • Secured creditors on possible enhancements to their security net and options in an enforcement scenario
  • Option, whether in court or out of court for creditors and ad hoc groups to maximise recoveries
  • Acting as offshore counsel in court proceedings in support of or to implement a restructuring and to oppose hostile creditor action
  • Appointment, recognition and removal of administrators, liquidators, receivers and provisional liquidators and their powers and duties while in office
  • Instigating or challenging désastre, dégrèvement, just and equitable winding up and other jurisdiction specific insolvency procedures
  • Recognition proceedings for insolvency practitioners, both into and out of our international jurisdictions
  • Refinancing, rescue and restructuring
  • Pre-pack sales / accelerated M&A processes
  • Holistic restructuring solutions such as schemes of arrangement, amalgamation and reconstruction, privatisations, debt for equity swaps and capital reductions
  • Government imposed sanctions in the distressed arena
  • Fraud, asset tracing, recovery and constructive trust proceedings
  • Cross-border issues, conflict of laws and cooperation between jurisdictions
  • Related regulatory advice and obtaining requisite regulatory consents and no objection letters

Restructuring and insolvency law firm

Among restructuring and insolvency law firms, we are renowned for our innovative approach and in-depth understanding of global legal frameworks. In particular, our ability to consistently deliver comprehensive and tailored solutions makes us a trusted partner for companies navigating the intricacies of corporate restructuring and insolvency, with our global team of offshore lawyers regularly being noted by leading legal directories for their frequent handling of high-profile commercial disputes and insolvency proceedings.

Client experience

Representative Work in offshore insolvency law and restructuring matters

Adviser to Barclays Private Bank

Advising Barclays Private Bank and Trust Limited in its capacity as corporate director of certain companies in the Belgravia Group, including giving urgent advice on various winding-up and other options available in light of the insolvency of certain of the companies.

Adviser to China Fortune Land Development Co. Ltd.

Acted as offshore counsel to China Fortune Land Development Co. Ltd. on its USD4.96 billion offshore debt restructuring by way of an English scheme of arrangement. This landmark deal is the largest offshore restructuring transaction completed by a Chinese company in recent years and also the first English scheme of arrangement of a Chinese real estate developer in the current wave of defaults.

Adviser to Sea Containers Ltd.

Advising Sea Containers Ltd. on the Bermudian aspects of its restructuring plan and emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, specifically on the incorporation of newly formed Bermuda companies, transfer of assets to the new companies and loan and security documentation.

Adviser to Shimao

Acted as BVI and Cayman Islands counsel for Adventure Success, a subsidiary of Shimao, on its USD1.5 billion loan from the Singapore-based United Overseas Bank. This transaction was been recognised as one of the “Deals of the Year” 2022 by China Business Law Journal

Adviser to Merced Capital

Acted as offshore counsel to Merced Capital on the restructuring and acquisition of the Telford Offshore Group following a share charge enforcement and competitive sales process. Advised on and filed for the winding-up of the rump group entities following the completion of the competitive sales process.

Adviser to Walton Insurance Company

Advising on and obtaining the sanction of the Supreme Court on a solvent scheme of arrangement for Walton Insurance Company Limited, commencing insolvent winding-up proceedings and advising on the liquidation and the operation of the scheme in the context of the insolvency.

Our Experts
  • All
  • BVI (3)
  • Mauritius (2)
  • Hong Kong (10)
  • Shanghai (2)
  • Shenzhen (1)
  • Isle of Man (7)
  • Cayman Islands (5)
  • Guernsey (5)
  • Jersey (2)
  • Bermuda (6)
Olwyn Barry

Olwyn Barry

Group Partner: BVI

T +44 (0)1534 818 357 or + 1 (284) 393 5345
E Email Olwyn

John Wasty

John Wasty

Partner & Head of Dispute Resolution : Bermuda

T +1 441 298 3232
E Email John

Spotlight

Insolvency & Restructuring in Cayman

Appleby’s Cayman Islands office is a leading force in Cayman insolvency and restructuring matters, delivering unparalleled expertise to clients. With a proven track record and a deep understanding of international regulations, our team of Cayman lawyers excel in financial and corporate restructuring cases, cross-border insolvencies, and distressed asset recovery. This knowledge and expertise also see us work on some of the largest and most complex offshore cases, advising and being engaged by a large number of global law firms and leading institutions.

What is insolvency and restructuring?

Insolvency and restructuring refer to the legal processes and strategies employed when a business is facing financial difficulties. Insolvency involves a company’s inability to pay its debts, while restructuring focuses on implementing changes to improve financial stability and operations, aiming to prevent insolvency or facilitate recovery.

How does restructuring help insolvent organisations?

Restructuring helps insolvent organisations by providing a framework to address their challenges effectively. It involves various measures such as debt renegotiation, asset sales, cost reduction, and operational adjustments. By implementing these changes, restructuring aims to stabilise the organisation’s finances, enhance its visibility, and potentially lead to its recovery or an orderly wind-down process.

More news
The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
28 Apr 2026

The Interplay Between Supervision Applications and Winding Up on the Just and Equitable Ground: Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC

In its recent judgment in Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC [2026] CIGC (FSD) 19, the Grand Court considered itself bound to make a supervision order pursuant to s.131(b) of the Companies Act, notwithstanding that the company was the subject of a pending just and equitable winding up (J&E) petition when its voluntary liquidation was commenced; and rejected an attack on the joint voluntary liquidators’ (JVLs) independence, which was principally based on a misreading of the JVLs’ evidence and lacked any objective foundation. The authors, who successfully represented the JVLs in obtaining the supervision order, discuss this important judgment further below – which is believed to be the first decision on the interplay between supervision applications and J&E proceedings under the Companies Act – and offer their views on the guidance that shareholders petitioning on the just and equitable ground may derive from it in future cases.  The challenge to the JVLs’ independence was rejected on the well-established principles which Doyle J discussed in Re Global Fidelity Bank [2021] 2 CILR 361, and is not discussed in further detail below.

Appleby-Website-BVI1
27 Apr 2026

Back to Basics - Dispute Series

Winding-Up Petitions in the BVI – A Practical Guide For Creditors Applying to appoint a BVI liquidator is one of the most cost effective and efficient tools available to creditors who want to recover debts or liabilities from BVI companies and is often a go-to strategy where simpler methods of debt collection have failed. Once appointed, a liquidator has a broad range of immediate powers including the ability to take possession and control of all of the company’s assets. In this guide, we highlight the process and the key principles for creditors to consider prior to and during the liquidator appointment process. 

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
23 Apr 2026

FamilyMart and Beyond: The Continuing Influence of the Privy Council’s Landmark Decision on Shareholder Litigation

The Privy Council's decision in FamilyMart China Holding Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp [2023] UKPC 33 is a landmark ruling that distinguishes the arbitrability of underlying shareholder disputes from the court's exclusive jurisdiction over just and equitable winding-up of a Cayman company.

Website-Code-Cayman
20 Apr 2026

Avoiding The Nuclear Option: Buyout Orders In Just And Equitable Winding Up Proceedings

With the Cayman Islands being a preferred jurisdiction for the incorporation of investment vehicles, inevitably cases will arise where non-controlling shareholders complain that they are being unfairly prejudiced by conduct of those in control, and necessarily pursue those complaints by way of proceedings to wind up the subject company on the just and equitable ground. Where such complaints are well-founded, the outcome will often be an order putting the subject company into official liquidation.  But the Cayman courts also have the jurisdiction in such cases to make a range of other orders as alternatives to taking that nuclear option, and are indeed obliged to consider whether any of those alternative orders would provide a more appropriate solution to the complaints.[1] The Grand Court was recently required to conduct that analysis in the case of Re Position Mobile Ltd SEZC.[2]  The petitioning shareholder in that case had satisfied the Court that it would be just and equitable to wind up the company – since it had justifiably lost confidence in the probity of those in control, due to their serious and sustained misconduct and mismanagement – but positively sought a buyout order[3] as an alternative to a winding up.  The Court thus proceeded to consider whether the buyout order, or any other alternative order, would be more appropriate than ordering a winding up, and concluded that a buyout order was the fairest and most appropriate form of relief in the circumstances of that case. The authors will discuss the guidance which the Position Mobile case provides in that regard below, which should be considered together with the guidance provided by Re Madera Technology Fund (CI) Ltd,[4] particularly in respect of the approach that the Cayman courts can be expected to take when setting the appropriate valuation date for a buyout order, with a view to ensuring that the valuation is fair to each side.[5] [1] See Re Virginia Solution SPC Ltd (unrep. 28 July 2023, CICA) at [61]. [2] [2026] CIGC (FSD) 10 [3] Requiring the respondent shareholders to purchase its shares at a fair price. [4] (unrep. 21 Aug. 2024, Richards J). [5] For further detail, see the authors’ article on the Madera Technology case at https://www.applebyglobal.com/publications/no-looking-back-investor-held-to-buyout-at-current-value-of-shares/.

Website-Code-BVI-2
17 Apr 2026

2026 Guide to Asset Tracing and Recovery in the Cayman Islands

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of Asset Tracing & Recovery laws and regulations applicable in the British Virgin Islands.

Website-Code-Cayman-1
16 Apr 2026

2026 Guide to Asset Tracing and Recovery in the Cayman Islands

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of Asset Tracing & Recovery laws and regulations applicable in Cayman Islands.

Fraud & Asset Tracing
15 Apr 2026

Bermuda: Asset Tracing and Recovery

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of Asset Tracing & Recovery laws and regulations applicable in Bermuda.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.