Outside of Court approved funding for official liquidators, litigation funding in the Cayman Islands has, until very recently, been deemed to be a breach of the common law of champerty and maintenance; being doctrines that were aimed at precluding frivolous litigation occurring.  The Act now specifically precludes litigation funding from being an offence under Cayman Islands common law, subject to some key checks and balances, outlined below.

Contingency fee agreements

For this reason, and prior to the Act, attorneys in the Cayman Islands were not permitted to enter into contingency fee agreements with clients, although conditional fee agreements were permitted, if approved by the Court.

Contingency fee agreements are those agreements which resulted in attorney’s fees for a specific case being deferred until the conclusion of that case, and then only payable upon the attorney being successful in the litigation. Contingency fee agreements can also provide for the payment of a success fee to the attorney. Both the attorney’s fees and any success fee are payable from recoveries from the successful litigation.

The Act now allows Cayman Islands’ attorneys to enter into contingency and conditional fee agreements, without the Court’s approval, and subject to a few conditions, including:

  1. Attorneys are not able to charge a success fee of more than 100% of the attorney’s normal fees;
  2. Attorneys are not able to claim a success fee which exceeds 40% of the total amount awarded (where the claim is sounded in money);
  3. Every contingency fee agreement shall be in writing and signed by the attorney, the client (or their authorised representative); and
  4. Every contingency fee agreement must be delivered to the client by the attorney on the date upon which it is executed.

The Act provides that any contingency fee agreement will not affect costs as between parties.

Notwithstanding the changes mentioned above, the Act requires that contingency fee agreements made by clients acting in a fiduciary position (in other words an attorney, guardian, or trustee under a deed  or will) will require Court examination before approval.

The provisions related to contingency fee agreements do not apply to care or criminal proceedings.

Litigation funding agreements

The Act now also expressly allows the entry into litigation funding agreements by clients. While such arrangements had previously been permitted by the Cayman court on a case by case basis, the terms of the agreements had to be carefully drafted, to avoid running into risks related to champerty and maintenance.

The Act defines a litigation funding agreement as one where a funder funds in whole, or in part, the provision of legal services to a client by an attorney, and the client then agrees to pay a sum to the funder in certain circumstances. A litigation funding agreement must comply with certain conditions, including:

  1. That certain requirements under the Act must be complied with, those may include:
    • That the funder provide prescribed information to the client before the agreement is made, and
    • May differ as between different descriptions of litigation funding agreements;
  2. The agreement must be writing;
  3. The sum to be paid by the client to the funder will consist of:
    • Costs payable to the client in respect of the relevant proceedings, together with an amount calculated by reference to the funder’s anticipated expenditure in funding the provision of legal services; or
    • A percentage of the amount of value of property recovered in the relevant action/proceedings.

The Act also provides for the provision of regulations relating to contingency fees and litigation funding agreements,  which it is hoped will provide further guidance on the requirements of the different agreements under the Act.

Ultimately, the introduction of the Act is a positive development for Cayman Islands litigants as it aligns Cayman litigation funding options with those that exist in a number of the key jurisdictions with which Cayman intersects. This change in Cayman’s legislative environment is welcomed as it finally gives the versatility in funding options to which our clients in major markets are accustomed.

Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More News
15 Nov 2021 | News

Appleby’s Hong Kong office acts as Cayman Islands counsel for UJU Holding Limited on its HKD804 million listing on the Main Board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange

UJU is one of the fast-growing market players in China’s emerging and rapid-growing online short v...

Contributors: Connie Wu
8 Nov 2021 | News

Cayman’s Global Citizen Programme Extended

Due to the popularity of the Global Citizen programme introduced in October 2020, the recently amend...

Contributors: Esmond Brown
2 Sep 2021 | News

Three Appleby Lawyers shortlisted for Citywealth Lawyer of the Year awards

Appleby partners Garry Manley and Olwyn Barry have been shortlisted for the “IFC Lawyer of the yea...

Contributors: Olwyn Barry, Esmond Brown
3 Aug 2021 | News

Hong Kong Partner David Bulley named as "M&A Lawyer of the Year" in two jurisdictions in the Innovation & Excellence Awards 2021

David Bulley has been named “M&A Lawyer of the Year” for both the Cayman Islands and British Vir...

26 Jul 2021 | News

Appleby Receives High Rankings in Chambers’ Annual High Net Worth Guide 2021

Lawyers from Appleby’s Bermuda, Cayman Islands and Jersey Private Client & Trusts practices ha...

14 Jul 2021 | News

Recent updates of the Cayman Islands Economic Substance Regime bring certain Partnerships into scope

On 30 June 2021, the Cayman Islands Government gazetted an amendment of the ES Schedule Regulations ...

9 Jul 2021 | News

Hong Kong Partner David Bulley once again named as "Corporate Finance Lawyer of the Year"

David Bulley, has been named “Corporate Finance Lawyer of the Year – Cayman Islands” in Financ...

24 Jun 2021 | News

Britannia Litigation: Success or Stalemate?

Britannia Litigation: Success or Stalemate? Cayman Shores Development Ltd and another v Registrar ...