The practice statement issued this week seeks to clarify the circumstances in which a wrongful trading claim may be brought against directors under Jersey law and emphasises certain matters by way of reassurance to directors, such as:

  • a wrongful trading claim can only be brought against a director if the company enters a formal insolvency process; and
  • for a claim to be successful, a director must know (or be reckless on the facts known to him or her) that the company no longer has a reasonable prospect of survival and there may be a wide spectrum of legitimate views as to what constitutes a “reasonable prospect”.  It may be that the Viscount or liquidator may only wish to pursue a clear claim, as there will be a significant evidential burden for them to overcome.

Directors are reminded that an order cannot be made against a director if they took reasonable steps to minimise losses to creditors and guidance is offered in the statement as to how directors may be able to demonstrate having taken such reasonable steps. Prudent financial and cash flow management are key during this time.  The practice note emphasises that it is not necessary to prove that losses to creditors were in fact minimised, rather that reasonable steps to this end were taken.

The practice statement offers practical guidance as to possible steps that could be taken that may go some way to defeat a wrongful trading claim should this be advanced at a later stage. What will be deemed to be reasonable in the circumstances will be very fact specific and the statement acknowledges that with the truly unprecedented circumstances that COVID-19 presents, there may simply be too many different views and approaches to say with any certainty that the directors did not take reasonable steps. This will offer some comfort to concerned directors at this time.

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
20 Mar 2023

Trusts: Comparison between the Crown Dependencies

Our Private Client and Trusts specialists in Guernsey, Isle of Man and Jersey outline some of the ke...

Contributors: Paula Fry, Melissa Wong
15 Mar 2023

Changes to the Jersey Competition Law Framework

Following the launch of the Government of Jersey's consultation on proposed changes to the competiti...

14 Mar 2023

Jersey Property Unit Trusts and the Trust Regulation Service

Our Appleby team looks at HMRC's recently updated guidance on Jersey Property Unit Trusts (JPUTs) an...

23 Feb 2023

Enforcement of security under the Security Interests (Jersey) Law 2012

Find out more about why the Security Interests (Jersey) Law 2012 (2012 Law) makes Jersey popular as ...

9 Feb 2023

Listing High Yield Bonds on the International Stock Exchange (TISE)

High Yield Bond issuers and their advisers continue to favour listing on The International Stock Exc...

1 Feb 2023

Fund Finance Laws and Regulations 2023 - Jersey

Fund finance is growing in Jersey. As an international financial centre (IFC) of choice for global i...

Contributors: Paul Worsnop, Daniel Healy
19 Jan 2023

The Edinburgh Reforms: An Offshore Perspective

On 9 December 2022, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer announced a package of reforms to the UK fina...

27 Sep 2022

Similar but Different

While the basic features of the trust remain, there are some notable differences in how trusts can b...

1 Aug 2022

Register of Overseas Entities: A Jersey perspective

The Register of Overseas Entities at Companies House (ROE), as contemplated by the Economic Crime (T...

30 Jun 2022

Digital Identification in Jersey

There have been considerable changes made to the way we do business in recent times. These changes w...

Contributors: Gemma Palmer, Paul Worsnop