The UK Business Secretary recently announced a temporary suspension of wrongful trading rules, meaning that company directors would not be personally liable for their decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst plans are in train to adopt equivalent measures in Jersey, the legal position in Jersey remains that a director has a duty not to allow the company to trade if they know (or is reckless as to whether) the company will not avoid insolvency.

Where a director or former director has allowed a company to trade while insolvent the court may order that such director be personally responsible, without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the debts or other liabilities of the company arising after the time specified by law.

A director will be excused if they took reasonable steps to minimise the potential loss to creditors. Accordingly, as soon as a director becomes aware that there is a real risk of insolvency, then they should to take reasonable steps to protect the creditors’ position (and seek to avoid personal liability).

Practical Considerations

Directors should exercise caution during this time. Boards of companies in financial distress may consider taking the following, practical steps, which will go some way to counter any arguments of “recklessness”, should these be advanced at a later date:

  • continue to hold regular board meetings (albeit remotely, if permitted under the company’s articles) and increase the frequency of such meetings should the financial position of the company worsen;
  • carefully minute board meetings and document decisions being taken, giving a clear rationale for these decisions;
  • interrogate the financial position of the company – how have items been accounted for? Is this accurate/realistic? What is the likelihood of any contingent liabilities crystallising in the near future?
  • engage with creditors – a lender approached in good time will have more options available to it to be able to offer support;
  • take appropriate professional advice; and
  • prepare contingency plans, agreeing trigger points and ultimately ensuring the timely winding up of the company should this become necessary.

If businesses are unable to weather the storm, directors should ultimately do all they can to ensure that their conduct in the run up to a formal insolvency process cannot be challenged or criticised. It is important to note that, whilst some directors may consider resigning in the hope that this will extinguish any liability going forward, this could actually increase the director’s potential liability if they have failed to act in the best interests of the creditors as a whole.

conclusion

One of the major difficulties with the current COVID-19 pandemic is the ongoing uncertainty. It is impossible to say with any certainty when “normality” will be restored and what the new normal will look like. What is certain is that a dynamic management team that carefully monitors the situation and keeps all stakeholders fully apprised will be best placed to protect the interests of creditors and shareholders thereby mitigating the risk of any personal exposure. Seeking professional advice will evidence reasonable steps being taken by a well-informed board, which will ultimately assist both directors and viable companies alike.

key contacts

James Gaudin

Managing Partner: Jersey

T +44 (0)1534 818 337
E Email James

Mark Brady

Group Partner: Jersey

T + 44 1534 818285
E Email Mark

Gemma Whale

Senior Associate: Jersey

T +44 (0) 1534 818 166
E Email Gemma

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
30 Jul 2021 |

Fighting international fraud

First published in New Law Journal, July 2021. Appleby partners Anthony William and Jared Dann an...

Contributors: Jared Dann, Claire Corkish
27 Jul 2021 |

Fund Finance Update – Will Jersey’s new sustainable investment disclosure requirements aid ESG financing?

This article provides an overview of ESG, the hot topic of 2020 that is carrying on full steam throu...

Contributors: Daniel Healy
22 Jul 2021 |

Listing Variable Funding Notes (VFNs) on The International Stock Exchange

This article provides a summary of Appleby listing agent services in the Channel Islands, and also o...

1 Jul 2021 |

Saunders v Vautier where the beneficial class is not closed - the debate goes on...

The rule in Saunders v Vautier is familiar territory for trust lawyers.  In the modern world it is ...

17 Jun 2021 |

Solvency Statements under Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 - Is it time to go paperless?

In April of this year, the Royal Court of Jersey considered the practicalities around the making of ...

Contributors: Kevin McQuillan
11 Jun 2021 |

“Offshore intelligence – Funds in demand” Appleby Podcast

We have recently produced a podcast focused on the Funds industry entitled “Offshore Intelligence ...

2 Jun 2021 |

Why use Jersey entities in restructurings?

As the extension of various forbearance measures and fiscal support packages continues in response t...

Contributors: Gemma Whale, Andrew Weaver
28 May 2021 |

Further updates to the JFSC’s AML Handbook

On 31 May 2021, the handbook for the prevention and detection of money laundering and the financing ...

Contributors: Gemma Whale
20 May 2021 |

Jersey - extension of economic substance requirements to partnerships

Draft legislation has been lodged for debate in the Jersey legislature which will have the effect of...

Contributors: Paul Worsnop
19 May 2021 |

Jersey to permit investment in lawful cannabis related businesses

Proposals have been lodged with the Jersey legislature to amend the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1...

Contributors: Mark Watson