We hope this registers! A summary of Cayman corporate and partnership registers in a finance transaction.

Published: 27 Oct 2021
Type: Insight

Cayman registers… they all sound vaguely similar but do very different things (and not always what you are expecting). Where does a Cayman partnership record security that it has granted? Why is a register of security interests irrelevant to what the entity itself has charged? Should a certain register be updated, annotated, just reviewed, provided at all…?


Because we know that it can be a little befuddling, we have set out below a guide to the various Cayman exempted company, limited liability company and exempted limited partnership registers in the context of a finance transaction. The first section is a summary of each register (what it does and when it is relevant) and the second section is more of a “choose your own structure” table, setting out the applicable registers in each case (divided into whether your transaction has (i) a Cayman borrower / pledgor / general partner / ultimate general partner, or (ii) a Cayman pledged entity). Although Cayman registers are obviously fantastically interesting, rather than being a fun chronological read-through we instead hope that this article can serve as a useful go-to guide for transactions involving Cayman entities. (We would also note that this is a look at the registers in the context of common commercial transactions, rather than setting out the obligations to maintain and update registers generally.)

EXEMPTED COMPANY REGISTERS

  1. Register of Directors and Officers (ROD)

    • What does it do? Records the names and addresses of the directors and officers of the exempted company (and the date of appointment / resignation).
    • When is it relevant? If the exempted company is signing documents as a borrower, general partner (GP) or ultimate general partner (UGP), to ensure that the correct people / entities are signing the suite of documents (resolutions, certificates, transaction documents).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? No.
  1. Register of Mortgages and Charges (ROMC)

    • What does it do? Records the security granted by the exempted company itself or any partnership for which is acts as GP (or UGP).
    • When is it relevant? If the exempted company (i) is granting security itself, or (ii) is acting as GP (or UGP) of a partnership that is granting security (including if it is acting as GP or UGP of a foreign partnership, subject to the laws of that foreign partnership). The ROMC will be reviewed prior to closing to ensure that security has not already been granted over the applicable assets.
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction?  Yes. If the exempted company (i) is granting security itself, then the ROMC is required to be updated with the details of the new security, or (ii) is acting as GP / UPG of a partnership that is granting security, then it is advisable that the ROMC be updated with the details of the new security.
  1. Register of Members (ROM)

    • What does it do? Sets out the shareholders of the exempted company, including the date of becoming / ceasing to be a shareholder and number / class of shares owned. Under Cayman law, the register of members is generally definitive of share ownership.
    • When is it relevant? If the identity of the shareholders is relevant to the transaction, so (i) if shareholder resolutions are being signed (to confirm that the correct shareholders are signing), or (ii) if the shares of the exempted company itself are being secured (to ensure that the applicable shareholder does actually own the shares).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? If security is being granted over the shares in the exempted company, then it is best practice for the ROM to be updated with an annotation noting that the shares are subject to security. The ROM will also be updated if the shareholding of the exempted company changes (e.g. if a golden share is being issued).

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (LLC) REGISTERS

  1. Register of Managers (ROMAN)

    • What does it do? Records the details of the managers of the LLC (and the date of appointment / resignation).
    • When is it relevant? If the LLC is manager-managed (as determined by the terms of the LLC Agreement) and is signing documents as a borrower or GP (or UGP) of a partnership, to ensure that the correct people / entities are signing the various documents (resolutions, certificates, transaction documents).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? No.
  1. Register of Members (ROM)

    • What does it do? Sets out the members of the LLC, including the date of becoming / ceasing to be a member.
    • When is it relevant? If the identity of the members is relevant to the transaction, so (i) if the LLC is member-managed (as determined by the terms of the LLC Agreement) and is signing documents as a borrower or GP (or UGP), to ensure that the correct people / entities are signing the various documents, or (ii) if the membership interests of the LLC are being secured (to ensure that the applicable member does actually hold the membership interests).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? No.
  1. Register of Mortgages and Charges (ROMC)

    • What does it do? Records the security granted by the LLC itself or by any partnership for which it acts as GP (or UGP).
    • When is it relevant? If the LLC (i) is granting security itself, or (ii) is acting as GP (or UGP) of a partnership that is granting security (including if it is acting as GP or UGP of a foreign partnership, subject to the laws of that foreign partnership). The ROMC will be reviewed prior to closing to ensure that security has not already been granted over the applicable assets.
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? Yes. If the LLC (i) is granting security itself, then the ROMC is required to be updated with the details of the new security, or (ii) is acting as GP / UPG of a partnership that is granting security, then it is advisable that the ROMC be updated with the details of the new security.
  1. Register of Security Interests (ROSI)

    • What does it do? Records whether security has been granted by a member over its membership interest in an LLC.
    • When is it relevant? When the status of membership interests in the LLC are relevant to the transaction (e.g. if they are the subject of the security package).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction?  Yes, if security is being granted over a member’s membership interest in the LLC.

EXEMPTED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ELP) REGISTERS

  1. Register of Partners and Register of Contributions (ROP / ROC)

    • What does it do? Sets out (i) the names and address of each limited partner and when it became / ceased to be a limited partner, and (ii) the amount and date of each partner’s contribution to the fund (and of any returns). These are technically two separate registers, but often provided together.
    • When is it relevant? When the limited partners and contributions to date are relevant to the transaction and security package. We would note that in subscription facilities, the commercial information provided by way of these registers has often already been provided to the lender in a separate form (such as through the subscription documentation and additional investor / fund information) and so the ROP / ROC are not always required as well (generally this is a deal specific point).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? No.
  1. Register of Security Interests (ROSI)

    • What does it do? Records whether security has been granted by a limited partner over its interest in an ELP.
    • When is it relevant? When the status of limited partnership interests in the ELP are relevant to the transaction (e.g. if they are the subject of the security package). There is often discussion as to whether this register is relevant for subscription facilities, but given security is taken over unfunded commitments for such facilities (i.e. the investors would not have assigned / secured the obligation to make the contribution) then this is not always a due diligence step taken.
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction?  Yes, if security is being granted over a limited partner’s interest in the ELP.

Entity structures and applicable Cayman registers – Borrowers / Pledgors / GP/ UGP

Borrower / Pledgor

GP / UGP

Applicable Cayman registers

Cayman exempted limited partnership

Cayman exempted company

Partnership registers:

  • ·ROC / ROP (if applicable commercial information as to partners / contributions has not been separately provided to the lender – often deal specific).

Company registers (of GP or UGP):

  • ·ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the Partnership (acting through the GP / UGP) and the GP / UGP itself (if applicable) has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted pursuant to the current transaction.
  • ROD – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (board resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as directors.

Cayman LLC

Partnership registers:

  • ·ROC / ROP (if applicable commercial information as to partners / contributions has not been separately provided to lender – often deal specific).

LLC registers (of GP or UGP):

  • ·ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the Partnership (acting through the GP / UGP) and the GP / UGP itself (if applicable) has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted pursuant to the current transaction.
  • ·If member managed: ROM – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (member resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as members.
  • ·If manager managed: ROMAN – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (manager resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as manager(s).

Foreign entity

Partnership registers:

  • ROC / ROP (if applicable commercial information as to partners / contributions has not been separately provided to lender – often deal specific)

GP / UGP registers: N/A

Foreign partnership

Cayman exempted company

Partnership registers: N/A

Company registers:

  • ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the Partnership (acting through the GP / UGP) and the GP / UGP itself (if applicable) has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted for the current transaction.
  • ·ROD – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (board resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as directors.

Cayman LLC

Partnership registers: N/A

LLC registers (of GP or UGP):

  • ·ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the Partnership (acting through the GP / UGP) and the GP / UGP itself (if applicable) has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted pursuant to the current transaction.
  • ·If member managed: ROM – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (member resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as members.
  • If manager managed: ROMAN – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (manager resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as manager(s).

Foreign entity

N/A

Cayman exempted company

N/A

Company registers:

  • ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the exempted company has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted for the current transaction.
  • ROD – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (board resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as directors.

Cayman LLC

N/A

LLC registers:

  • ·ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the LLC has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted pursuant to the current transaction.
  • If member managed: ROM – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (member resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as member(s).
  • If manager managed: ROMAN – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (manager resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as manager(s).

Entity structures and applicable Cayman registers – Cayman pledged entities

Pledged Entity

Registers

Cayman exempted company

  • ROM – to ensure that the pledgor does actually own the shares being secured. It is best practice for the ROM to then be updated with an annotation noting that the shares are subject to security.

Cayman LLC

  • ROM – to ensure that the pledgor does actually own the membership interests being secured.
  • ROSI – to ensure that the applicable membership interest is not currently subject to security. This register is then required to be updated to reflect the security granted over the membership interests pursuant to the current transaction.

Cayman exempted limited partnership

  • ·ROP / ROC – to ensure that the pledgor does actually own the partnership interests being secured.
  • ROSI – to ensure that the applicable partnership interest is not currently subject to security. This register is then required to be updated to reflect the security granted over the partnership interests pursuant to the current transaction.
AcronymRegistersRelevant types of entities
ROCRegister of ContributionsELP
RODRegister of Directors and OfficersExempted company
ROMRegister of MembersELP, LLC
ROMANRegister of ManagersLLC
ROMCRegister of Mortgages and ChargesExempted company, LLC
ROPRegister of PartnersELP
ROSIRegister of Security InterestsELP, LLC
Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Funds-and-Investment-Services
28 Oct 2026

Side Letters: Preferential Terms, Practical Challenges

Side letters are a common feature of Cayman Islands investment funds. This article outlines the legal framework governing side letters, the key considerations for fund operators when negotiating and granting preferential terms, and the implications of side letters for subscription financing arrangements.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
22 Oct 2026

Grand Court Sees Through "Specific Performance" Label And Stays Redemption Claim In Favour Of HKIAC Arbitration

We are pleased to report on our recent win in the Cayman Grand Court: a stay of Cayman proceedings concerning a US$87m+ redemption claim in favour of HKIAC arbitration. Doyle J found that the claim for "specific performance" was "entirely artificial and a mere device" intended to escape the arbitration clause. The Appleby team comprised John McCarroll SC, Damon Booth and Ray Leung (Hong Kong), and Andrew Jackson and Zuhair Farouki (Cayman). Andrew Ayres KC appeared as leading counsel.

Appleby-Website-Cayman1
21 Oct 2026

The Cayman Islands LLC at ten: what fund finance has learned

Ten years on, the Cayman Islands LLC is an established part of fund finance practice. A useful question is how an LLC’s contractual flexibility affects lender diligence, security and enforcement, and when an exempted company remains the more efficient financing vehicle.

Website-Code-Cayman-1
1 Sep 2026

The Executor's Year in the Law of the Cayman Islands

Of Jarndyce and Jarndyce, the suit which stands at the centre of Bleak House and which concerned an estate drawn into the administration of the Court of Chancery, Dickens wrote that 'this scarecrow of a suit has, in course of time, become so complicated that no man alive knows what it means'. The complaint was not the novelist's invention. It was directed at a state of affairs in which the beneficiary dissatisfied with the conduct of an administration had in substance one remedy, a decree for general administration, which took the whole estate into the hands of the court and kept it there, upon occasion until there was little left to distribute.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
26 Aug 2026

Comparative Analysis of Cayman and BVI Companies as Listing Vehicles

This article provides an in-depth company-law comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of Cayman Islands and BVI companies as listing vehicles, with a view to assisting businesses in selecting the appropriate jurisdiction of incorporation for their listing vehicle.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
13 Aug 2026

Restructurings Frustrating Creditors And The Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards: The English High Court's Decision In State Oil Company Of Azerbaijan v Mansimov

The English High Court has issued a significant judgment on the enforcement of arbitral awards, the reach of section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the limits of the Marex tort, with potential relevance to the Cayman Islands' Fraudulent Dispositions Act.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
7 Aug 2026

New CIMA Rules on AML/CFT/CPF Compliance and Financial Sanctions Issued in the Cayman Islands

On 20 July 2026, further to an industry consultation, the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) published the following two new Rules set to introduce binding risk management, governance, sanctions screening and other compliance requirements for regulated financial service providers in the Cayman Islands: (i) Rule on Effective Compliance Programmes for the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing for Financial Services Providers (AML Rule); and (ii) Rule on Compliance with Financial Sanctions and Targeted Financial Sanctions (Sanctions Rule and, together with the AML Rule, the Rules). All CIMA-regulated financial services providers, including investment funds, insurers and reinsurers that are conducting ‘relevant financial business’ as defined under the Proceeds of Crime Act (Revised) (POCA) (FSP), are encouraged to review and update their documented framework of AML/CFT/CPF and sanctions compliance policies, procedures, controls, oversight and reporting mechanisms (Compliance Programmes) to ensure compliance with the Rules by the time they come into force on 18 September 2026.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
5 Aug 2026

Good faith in action, not just belief: the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa and its significance in the Cayman Islands

May a company director depart from a strategy his board has agreed, in the sincere belief that he knows a better route to the company’s success? In Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa [2026] UKSC 21, the Supreme Court held that, whatever the answer, a director cannot pursue his own strategy by concealing it from, and misleading, his fellow directors. The Court confirmed that the good faith duty is not confined to a director’s sincerely held view of the company’s best interests; it also governs the means by which the director acts. The decision is an authoritative statement of the content of the fiduciary duty of loyalty, and is likely to be influential in the Cayman Islands. The decision will interest directors, those who advise or appoint them, and stakeholders affected by directors’ conduct.

Website-Code-Cayman-2
30 Jul 2026

Contingent Creditors, Standing And The Winding Up Jurisdiction: Analysing Re Petrosaudi International

The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal has delivered a highly significant judgment in Re PetroSaudi International.[1] The Court clarified the circumstances in which an alleged contingent creditor will have standing to petition to wind up a company under section 94(1)(b) of the Companies Act, and confirmed that there is no jurisdiction to make a winding up order on an ex parte without notice basis.[2] Our article analyses the Court of Appeal’s decision, and considers its implications for insolvency practitioners.

Website-Code-Cayman-1
30 Jul 2026

Final Means Final: Wei v Wang and the Common Law Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the Cayman Islands

English Court Reaffirms Pro-Enforcement Approach to Foreign Judgments In Wei v Wang [2026] EWHC 1892 (Comm), the Court confirmed that exceptional avenues of review do not undermine the finality of a judgment and reiterated the limited scope of the natural justice defence.