We hope this registers! A summary of Cayman corporate and partnership registers in a finance transaction.

Published: 27 Oct 2021
Type: Insight

Cayman registers… they all sound vaguely similar but do very different things (and not always what you are expecting). Where does a Cayman partnership record security that it has granted? Why is a register of security interests irrelevant to what the entity itself has charged? Should a certain register be updated, annotated, just reviewed, provided at all…?

Primary Contact
Georgina Pullinger

Georgina Pullinger

Consultant
Cayman Islands

T +1 345 814 2089
E [email protected]

Georgina Pullinger
Georgina Pullinger

Because we know that it can be a little befuddling, we have set out below a guide to the various Cayman exempted company, limited liability company and exempted limited partnership registers in the context of a finance transaction. The first section is a summary of each register (what it does and when it is relevant) and the second section is more of a “choose your own structure” table, setting out the applicable registers in each case (divided into whether your transaction has (i) a Cayman borrower / pledgor / general partner / ultimate general partner, or (ii) a Cayman pledged entity). Although Cayman registers are obviously fantastically interesting, rather than being a fun chronological read-through we instead hope that this article can serve as a useful go-to guide for transactions involving Cayman entities. (We would also note that this is a look at the registers in the context of common commercial transactions, rather than setting out the obligations to maintain and update registers generally.)

locations

Cayman Islands

services

Corporate, Fund Finance, Regulatory Advice

Sector

Banking & Financial Services Lawyers

types

Insight

EXEMPTED COMPANY REGISTERS

  1. Register of Directors and Officers (ROD)

    • What does it do? Records the names and addresses of the directors and officers of the exempted company (and the date of appointment / resignation).
    • When is it relevant? If the exempted company is signing documents as a borrower, general partner (GP) or ultimate general partner (UGP), to ensure that the correct people / entities are signing the suite of documents (resolutions, certificates, transaction documents).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? No.

  1. Register of Mortgages and Charges (ROMC)

    • What does it do? Records the security granted by the exempted company itself or any partnership for which is acts as GP (or UGP).
    • When is it relevant? If the exempted company (i) is granting security itself, or (ii) is acting as GP (or UGP) of a partnership that is granting security (including if it is acting as GP or UGP of a foreign partnership, subject to the laws of that foreign partnership). The ROMC will be reviewed prior to closing to ensure that security has not already been granted over the applicable assets.
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction?  Yes. If the exempted company (i) is granting security itself, then the ROMC is required to be updated with the details of the new security, or (ii) is acting as GP / UPG of a partnership that is granting security, then it is advisable that the ROMC be updated with the details of the new security.

  1. Register of Members (ROM)

    • What does it do? Sets out the shareholders of the exempted company, including the date of becoming / ceasing to be a shareholder and number / class of shares owned. Under Cayman law, the register of members is generally definitive of share ownership.
    • When is it relevant? If the identity of the shareholders is relevant to the transaction, so (i) if shareholder resolutions are being signed (to confirm that the correct shareholders are signing), or (ii) if the shares of the exempted company itself are being secured (to ensure that the applicable shareholder does actually own the shares).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? If security is being granted over the shares in the exempted company, then it is best practice for the ROM to be updated with an annotation noting that the shares are subject to security. The ROM will also be updated if the shareholding of the exempted company changes (e.g. if a golden share is being issued).

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (LLC) REGISTERS

  1. Register of Managers (ROMAN)

    • What does it do? Records the details of the managers of the LLC (and the date of appointment / resignation).
    • When is it relevant? If the LLC is manager-managed (as determined by the terms of the LLC Agreement) and is signing documents as a borrower or GP (or UGP) of a partnership, to ensure that the correct people / entities are signing the various documents (resolutions, certificates, transaction documents).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? No.

  1. Register of Members (ROM)

    • What does it do? Sets out the members of the LLC, including the date of becoming / ceasing to be a member.
    • When is it relevant? If the identity of the members is relevant to the transaction, so (i) if the LLC is member-managed (as determined by the terms of the LLC Agreement) and is signing documents as a borrower or GP (or UGP), to ensure that the correct people / entities are signing the various documents, or (ii) if the membership interests of the LLC are being secured (to ensure that the applicable member does actually hold the membership interests).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? No.

  1. Register of Mortgages and Charges (ROMC)

    • What does it do? Records the security granted by the LLC itself or by any partnership for which it acts as GP (or UGP).
    • When is it relevant? If the LLC (i) is granting security itself, or (ii) is acting as GP (or UGP) of a partnership that is granting security (including if it is acting as GP or UGP of a foreign partnership, subject to the laws of that foreign partnership). The ROMC will be reviewed prior to closing to ensure that security has not already been granted over the applicable assets.
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? Yes. If the LLC (i) is granting security itself, then the ROMC is required to be updated with the details of the new security, or (ii) is acting as GP / UPG of a partnership that is granting security, then it is advisable that the ROMC be updated with the details of the new security.

  1. Register of Security Interests (ROSI)

    • What does it do? Records whether security has been granted by a member over its membership interest in an LLC.
    • When is it relevant? When the status of membership interests in the LLC are relevant to the transaction (e.g. if they are the subject of the security package).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction?  Yes, if security is being granted over a member’s membership interest in the LLC.

EXEMPTED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ELP) REGISTERS

  1. Register of Partners and Register of Contributions (ROP / ROC)

    • What does it do? Sets out (i) the names and address of each limited partner and when it became / ceased to be a limited partner, and (ii) the amount and date of each partner’s contribution to the fund (and of any returns). These are technically two separate registers, but often provided together.
    • When is it relevant? When the limited partners and contributions to date are relevant to the transaction and security package. We would note that in subscription facilities, the commercial information provided by way of these registers has often already been provided to the lender in a separate form (such as through the subscription documentation and additional investor / fund information) and so the ROP / ROC are not always required as well (generally this is a deal specific point).
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction? No.

  1. Register of Security Interests (ROSI)

    • What does it do? Records whether security has been granted by a limited partner over its interest in an ELP.
    • When is it relevant? When the status of limited partnership interests in the ELP are relevant to the transaction (e.g. if they are the subject of the security package). There is often discussion as to whether this register is relevant for subscription facilities, but given security is taken over unfunded commitments for such facilities (i.e. the investors would not have assigned / secured the obligation to make the contribution) then this is not always a due diligence step taken.
    • Should it be updated as part of the transaction?  Yes, if security is being granted over a limited partner’s interest in the ELP.

Entity structures and applicable Cayman registers – Borrowers / Pledgors / GP/ UGP

Borrower / Pledgor

GP / UGP

Applicable Cayman registers

Cayman exempted limited partnership

Cayman exempted company

Partnership registers:

  • ·ROC / ROP (if applicable commercial information as to partners / contributions has not been separately provided to the lender – often deal specific).

Company registers (of GP or UGP):

  • ·ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the Partnership (acting through the GP / UGP) and the GP / UGP itself (if applicable) has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted pursuant to the current transaction.
  • ROD – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (board resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as directors.

Cayman LLC

Partnership registers:

  • ·ROC / ROP (if applicable commercial information as to partners / contributions has not been separately provided to lender – often deal specific).

LLC registers (of GP or UGP):

  • ·ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the Partnership (acting through the GP / UGP) and the GP / UGP itself (if applicable) has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted pursuant to the current transaction.
  • ·If member managed: ROM – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (member resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as members.
  • ·If manager managed: ROMAN – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (manager resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as manager(s).

Foreign entity

Partnership registers:

  • ROC / ROP (if applicable commercial information as to partners / contributions has not been separately provided to lender – often deal specific)

GP / UGP registers: N/A

Foreign partnership

Cayman exempted company

Partnership registers: N/A

Company registers:

  • ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the Partnership (acting through the GP / UGP) and the GP / UGP itself (if applicable) has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted for the current transaction.
  • ·ROD – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (board resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as directors.

Cayman LLC

Partnership registers: N/A

LLC registers (of GP or UGP):

  • ·ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the Partnership (acting through the GP / UGP) and the GP / UGP itself (if applicable) has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted pursuant to the current transaction.
  • ·If member managed: ROM – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (member resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as members.
  • If manager managed: ROMAN – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (manager resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as manager(s).

Foreign entity

N/A

Cayman exempted company

N/A

Company registers:

  • ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the exempted company has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted for the current transaction.
  • ROD – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (board resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as directors.

Cayman LLC

N/A

LLC registers:

  • ·ROMC – to confirm what security (if any) the LLC has previously granted. Register to then be updated to reflect security granted pursuant to the current transaction.
  • If member managed: ROM – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (member resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as member(s).
  • If manager managed: ROMAN – to ensure that the correct people / entities are executing the applicable documents (manager resolutions, certificates and transaction documents) as manager(s).

Entity structures and applicable Cayman registers – Cayman pledged entities

Pledged Entity

Registers

Cayman exempted company

  • ROM – to ensure that the pledgor does actually own the shares being secured. It is best practice for the ROM to then be updated with an annotation noting that the shares are subject to security.

Cayman LLC

  • ROM – to ensure that the pledgor does actually own the membership interests being secured.
  • ROSI – to ensure that the applicable membership interest is not currently subject to security. This register is then required to be updated to reflect the security granted over the membership interests pursuant to the current transaction.

Cayman exempted limited partnership

  • ·ROP / ROC – to ensure that the pledgor does actually own the partnership interests being secured.
  • ROSI – to ensure that the applicable partnership interest is not currently subject to security. This register is then required to be updated to reflect the security granted over the partnership interests pursuant to the current transaction.
AcronymRegistersRelevant types of entities
ROCRegister of ContributionsELP
RODRegister of Directors and OfficersExempted company
ROMRegister of MembersELP, LLC
ROMANRegister of ManagersLLC
ROMCRegister of Mortgages and ChargesExempted company, LLC
ROPRegister of PartnersELP
ROSIRegister of Security InterestsELP, LLC
Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring-562x340
14 Jul 2026

Directors Cannot Delay Shareholder Votes: Cayman Court Limits Postponement Powers

Eliot Simpson
Ray Leung
Steven Yuen
Eliot Simpson, Ray Leung, Steven Yuen
Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance
13 Jul 2026

Guide to Loans & Secured Financing in the Cayman Islands 2026

This guide provides local insights into the legal and regulatory framework governing bank lending and finance. It covers key topics including bank loans versus debt securities, common forms of bank loan facilities, bridge financing, the roles of agents, trustees and lenders, and governing laws. It also examines the regulatory landscape, including capital, liquidity and disclosure requirements, the use of loan proceeds, cross-border lending, and interest rate and currency restrictions. In addition, the guide explores security interests and guarantees, the impact of fraudulent conveyance and similar doctrines on bank loan financing structures, intercreditor arrangements, loan terms and structures, and recent market developments.

Caroline Barton
Caroline Barton
Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
9 Jul 2026

A Warning to Litigants Seeking Funding: English High Court Clarifies the Limits of Litigation Privilege

Important for Cayman litigants, funders and attorneys given the growing use of third-party funding in disputes.

Harriet Ter-Berg
Alan Bercow
Sofia Kranjec
Harriet Ter-Berg, Alan Bercow, Sofia Kranjec
Appleby-Website-Fraud-and-Asset-Tracing
8 Jul 2026

A Cautionary Tale in Interim Injunctive Relief: Lessons from Dixon v Seymour

In a recent judgment of Chief Justice Ramsay-Hale, the Cayman Grand Court provided guidance on the necessary components of an application for interim injunctive relief. The ruling illustrates how an ex parte application may fail to satisfy the American Cyanamid test when unsupported by proper evidence.

Alan Bercow
William Spence
Alan Bercow, William Spence
Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
7 Jul 2026

CIMA’s 2026 Reinsurance Thematic Review: Focus Points for Boards

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published its 2026 Thematic Review of Reinsurance Companies (Thematic Review). This reflects fieldwork conducted by CIMA between mid-2025 and Q1 2026 at selected Class B(iii) and Class D licensed reinsurers. The focus being on compliance with the Insurance Act (as revised) and other applicable legislation, regulations, rules and statements of guidance as issued by CIMA centering around stress-testing, cash flow testing frameworks, capital and collateral adequacy management, and corporate governance. Corporate governance weaknesses account for 68% of all findings with the remaining 32% spread across stress-testing, cash flow testing capital and collateral adequacy. Notwithstanding these findings, CIMA has noted several good practices across all areas including, importantly, comprehensive risk management frameworks covering key risk areas and strong capital and collateral adequacy monitoring processes. With Cayman’s reinsurance sector having grown to an institutional scale, and over 110 licensed reinsurers writing in the order of US$30 billion in annual premiums against over US$100 billion in assets, this latest Thematic Review demonstrates development in CIMA’s supervisory expectations of Cayman’s licensed reinsurers. It represents a reflection of the jurisdiction’s increasingly sophisticated and maturing reinsurance market and reinforces that CIMA’s expectations align closely with the standards that onshore counterparty cedants, rating agencies and US state regulators already expect. We take this opportunity to review certain of the key findings alongside CIMA’s cross-sectoral 2026 Thematic Review on Outsourcing, note some of the good practices highlighted by CIMA and make some associated recommendations for Cayman reinsurers.

Jacob MacAdam, Martin Byers, Simon Raftopoulos, Dean Bennett, Miriam Smyth
Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
25 Jun 2026

CIMA Enforcement Action in Focus: Reminders and Recommendations

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has recently published a number of Enforcement Notices that provide helpful context for regulated entities, including Licensees and Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA), seeking to understand and meet their ongoing regulatory obligations in the Cayman Islands. In early June 2026, CIMA exercised its enforcement powers under SIBA Section 17 to cancel the registrations of several SIBA Registered Persons on the basis that it had reasonable grounds to believe that such Registered Persons had failed to meet certain key regulatory obligations. The Appleby Team takes this opportunity to review the relevant findings and CIMA enforcement action; and to highlight certain key obligations that attach to regulated entities in the Cayman Islands.

Simon Raftopoulos, Martin Byers, Maree Martin, Menelik Miller, Miriam Smyth
Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
23 Jun 2026

Important Cayman Islands Industry Advisory: Common Reporting Standard 2.0 and Economic Substance Updates

Further to the introduction of the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 (the CRS Amendment Regulations or CRS 2.0), the Cayman Islands Department for International Tax Cooperation (DITC) has issued an Industry Advisory flagging certain key updates in respect of Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and Economic Substance (ES) reporting in the Cayman Islands. Cayman Financial Institutions will be required file 2025 CRS Returns and Declarations by 31 July 2026, ahead of the online DITC Portal’s closure to facilitate its transition to XML Schema v3.0. ES courtesy reminders (which have historically been sent by email to designated Responsible Persons in advance of annual ES reporting deadlines) will no longer be issued such that Relevant Entities will need to independently track such deadlines themselves. Updated Individual and Entity CRS Self-Certification forms, aligned with CRS 2.0, are now available online via the DITC website.

Martin Byers
Maree Martin
Miriam Smyth
Menelik Miller
Martin Byers, Maree Martin, Miriam Smyth, Menelik Miller
JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
18 Jun 2026

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [2026] CIGC (FSD) 22, the Grand Court clarified the scope of joint provisional liquidators' powers following their appointment. In particular, the Court confirmed that the appointment of provisional liquidators does not automatically displace existing directors.

David Lee
Joe Dale
David Lee, Joe Dale
Appleby-Website-Cayman2
17 Jun 2026

Property, Fairness and the Constitution: The Grand Court Marks the Boundaries of Freedom of Information

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has overturned a decision of the Ombudsman in a successful judicial review brought by Caribbean Utilities Company, Ltd. (CUC), represented by Appleby.

Andrew Jackson
Zuhair Farouki
Andrew Jackson, Zuhair Farouki
JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
28 Apr 2026

The Interplay Between Supervision Applications and Winding Up on the Just and Equitable Ground: Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC

In its recent judgment in Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC [2026] CIGC (FSD) 19, the Grand Court considered itself bound to make a supervision order pursuant to s.131(b) of the Companies Act, notwithstanding that the company was the subject of a pending just and equitable winding up (J&E) petition when its voluntary liquidation was commenced; and rejected an attack on the joint voluntary liquidators’ (JVLs) independence, which was principally based on a misreading of the JVLs’ evidence and lacked any objective foundation. The authors, who successfully represented the JVLs in obtaining the supervision order, discuss this important judgment further below – which is believed to be the first decision on the interplay between supervision applications and J&E proceedings under the Companies Act – and offer their views on the guidance that shareholders petitioning on the just and equitable ground may derive from it in future cases.  The challenge to the JVLs’ independence was rejected on the well-established principles which Doyle J discussed in Re Global Fidelity Bank [2021] 2 CILR 361, and is not discussed in further detail below.

Andrew Jackson
Luke Burgess-Shannon
Sofia Kranjec
Andrew Jackson, Luke Burgess-Shannon, Sofia Kranjec