Crypto Funds in the Cayman Islands

Published: 1 Jul 2025
Type: Insight

As one of the leading offshore financial centres, home to approximately 70% of the world’s offshore investment funds and with an absence of any direct taxation on companies or individuals, the Cayman Islands has become an attractive destination for technology entrepreneurs. The introduction of framework legislation regulating virtual asset service providers (the VASP Act) in 2020 attracted a number of new entrants to the Cayman market.


Cayman’s flexible business-orientated legislation enabled the Islands to pivot away from retail crowdfunded models towards security tokens and stablecoins, which provided greater value stability and more predictable investment returns. This same flexibility means that Cayman is already taking advantage of the latest shift towards securitising common assets and decentralised finance (DeFi) products.

Importantly, there are no restrictions on the types of assets in which a Cayman Islands fund may invest, including virtual assets. The usual considerations should be addressed including the need for regulation of the fund with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority as a mutual fund (open ended) or private fund (closed ended) unless an exemption applies (see our overview for further details). A virtual asset fund should consider the need for compliance with the VASP Act which may require the fund to register or obtain a license if it provides virtual asset services which fall outside traditional fund activities, such as the issuance of virtual assets, custody of virtual assets or the transfer/exchange of virtual assets, for or on behalf of others.

What kind of asset is a virtual asset?

The VASP Act defines virtual assets as “a digital representation of value that can be digitally traded or transferred and can be used for payment or investment purposes but does not include a digital representation of fiat currencies”. This wide definition captures all cryptocurrencies, security tokens, utility tokens or other digital assets that are tradeable or transferable, with the exception of digital fiat currencies.

Whether virtual assets are considered “property” may be relevant to a Cayman Islands fund in circumstances where the fund may want to grant security over its virtual assets or where the fund needs to pursue claims against its custodians for the recovery of its assets.  Where security is to be taken over virtual assets appropriate measures, such as taking custody of private keys, would be advisable to secure these charges effectively.

Where the equity interests of a Cayman fund are tokenised and the fund’s investors want to grant security over those tokens security should also be taken over the underlying equity interests by way of equitable share mortgages or charges.

Subscribing and redeeming in kind using virtual assets

This is permissible in Cayman but any subscription made to a Cayman fund is required to be subject to detailed customer due diligence (CDD) processes. The Cayman Islands has long been committed to implementing best international practices and is compliant with the anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing requirements of the OECD and FATF. As a member of the Caribbean FATF, the Cayman Islands implements recommendations promulgated by the FATF. All Cayman Islands-incorporated entities are subject to the Proceeds of Crime Act which sets out the principal money laundering offences. Certain “relevant” businesses (which would include registered mutual funds, registered private funds, VASPs, entities registered or licensed for investment management or advisory services and other entities thought to be at a higher risk of money laundering) are further subject to the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations which prescribe certain identification, record keeping and internal control procedures for such businesses.

Businesses in the Cayman Islands need to adopt a risk-based approach to the collection of CDD information. Under the risk-based approach, the latest guidelines from the FATF permit the digital verification of identities and receipt of electronic copies of documents instead of traditional “wet ink” paper-based processes. Given Cayman’s stringent CDD requirements, a number of service providers have adopted technologies to enable the onboarding of clients and the collection of CDD information digitally.

Trades on virtual asset exchanges generally require each participant to have completed KYC checks although certain exchanges are more stringent on these requirements than others and Cayman funds may want to limit the receipt of subscription funds from exchanges to only those with strong anti-money laundering policies.

Whether subscriptions in specie are transferred via virtual asset exchanges or from digital asset wallets additional information may be sought by a Cayman virtual asset fund to evidence the source of investor funds including tracing transactions back to fiat currencies and evidence of sources of investor wealth.

The redemption of an equity interest in a Cayman fund will require the same considerations relating to CDD as a subscription in kind. Full investor CDD should be obtained before redemption payments are made whether in cash or in kind by the transfer of virtual assets and payments should be made only to accounts or wallets in the investor’s name.

Tokenised funds

Tokenised funds have proved increasingly popular in recent years. In a tokenised fund, an investor’s interest is represented by a cryptographic token, as opposed to shares or other interests or units offered to investors in a more traditional fund structure. Cayman’s company legislation and the wide choice of corporate vehicles available allows for a great deal of commercial flexibility and lends itself well to tokenised equity issuances.

Cayman’s Companies Act and Exempted Limited Partnership Act each provide flexibility for Cayman funds to determine the manner for passing investor resolutions and the process for transferring their equity securities, both of which can be conducted electronically, with the instruments of transfer completed digitally. Under Cayman law, legal title to a share or exempted limited partnership interest is transferred when the name of the transferee is entered into the fund’s register of members or partners. For a Cayman-exempted company or exempted limited partnership that register may be held electronically, provided the company can produce legible evidence of its contents and, consequently, could be held encrypted on a private blockchain and accessed when required. Smart contracts built into the tokens can govern those transfers once any pre-set conditions have been satisfied and also ensure that the register of members or partners is updated simultaneously with any transfer. Regulatory concerns over AML, CDD and jurisdictional restrictions can be alleviated in the same way and a tokenised fund is likely to appoint a smart contract auditor and/or a third party CDD service provider to assist with the CDD process for subscribers.

Depending on the redemption rights relating to the equity interests, token holders may redeem their tokens for cash and/or payments in-kind (or a combination thereof) or transfer their tokens with the consent of the fund’s operators. The attraction for holders of these tokens is that they also have the potential to offer liquidity through an exchange.

Alternatively a Cayman tokenised fund may facilitate tokenisation through depository receipts rather than the equity securities themselves. In such cases, the Cayman fund would issue the equity securities to a licensed depository which in turn would issue tokenised depository receipts, representing those equity securities, to investors. The depository will hold the underlying equity securities on trust for token holders on the terms set out in the depository agreements.

The recently published Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment) Bill confirms that virtual assets as defined under the VASP Act does not include the equity interests of Cayman registered funds and anticipates that the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority will issue a statement of guidance or rule in relation to Cayman registered funds that issue tokenized equity interests.

Custody of virtual assets

Cryptocurrency exchanges remain among the most popular digital asset custodians in the industry offering sophisticated custody solutions across multiple digital asset classes. Many of these exchanges operate under comprehensive regulatory frameworks across global jurisdictions. In additional traditional financial players such as established banks are also beginning to offer virtual asset custody services bringing substantial resources and custody expertise.  Some institutions outsource to sub-custodians for virtual assets whilst others maintain direct control.

Security of digital assets held in custody on exchanges or through custody wallets are at risk from malware, hacking, scams and phishing attacks and robust cybersecurity should be an essential pre-requisite in the selection by a Cayman fund of custody service providers.

Valuation of virtual assets

Managers of Cayman funds may trade across multiple exchanges and counterparties in private transactions and also directly on chain through decentralised finance protocols. In these circumstances virtual assets trading and pricing information for the fund will need to be collated from multiple sources and analysed through traditional accounting principles that are capable of audit. Order management systems might be used to access and transact across multiple exchanges and protocols via established accounts at multiple trading venues providing managers trading access without the need to open their own individual accounts.

Due to the potential for extreme volatility in the value of virtual assets, Cayman funds should provide for their operators and/or managers to adopt methods of valuation other than pricing obtained through the above sources if they consider that it would better reflect the fair value of those assets.

Appleby

With technological innovation transforming businesses and markets and with a number of offshore jurisdictions vying to become technology hubs, Appleby led the way amongst the offshore firms by establishing a dedicated, multi-disciplinary Global Technology and Innovation Group in 2017 to support leading technology companies and start-ups across a broad range of emerging technologies.

Working closely with the Technology Group, our Cayman Investment Funds team has carved out a true niche in the digital assets space making Appleby the go-to firm for the establishment of funds investing in cryptographic assets, and the creation of tokenised funds and other bespoke pooled structures in this fast-moving space.

Share
More publications
The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
28 Apr 2026

The Interplay Between Supervision Applications and Winding Up on the Just and Equitable Ground: Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC

In its recent judgment in Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC [2026] CIGC (FSD) 19, the Grand Court considered itself bound to make a supervision order pursuant to s.131(b) of the Companies Act, notwithstanding that the company was the subject of a pending just and equitable winding up (J&E) petition when its voluntary liquidation was commenced; and rejected an attack on the joint voluntary liquidators’ (JVLs) independence, which was principally based on a misreading of the JVLs’ evidence and lacked any objective foundation. The authors, who successfully represented the JVLs in obtaining the supervision order, discuss this important judgment further below – which is believed to be the first decision on the interplay between supervision applications and J&E proceedings under the Companies Act – and offer their views on the guidance that shareholders petitioning on the just and equitable ground may derive from it in future cases.  The challenge to the JVLs’ independence was rejected on the well-established principles which Doyle J discussed in Re Global Fidelity Bank [2021] 2 CILR 361, and is not discussed in further detail below.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
23 Apr 2026

ReConnect 2026: Practical takeaways for Reinsurers, Cedants and Investors doing business in the Cayman Islands

The Cayman International Reinsurance Commercial Association (CIRCA) held its annual conference, [Re]Connect, last week at the Ritz-Carlton, Grand Cayman. This year’s [Re]Connect has once again demonstrated Cayman’s growing influence in global reinsurance and the strength of the jurisdiction’s regulatory, professional and commercial ecosystem. The event brought together 675 registered delegates, including reinsurers, cedants, major US law firms, audit firms, tax practices, asset managers, overseas regulators, industry leaders and rating agencies – as well as Appleby Cayman’s [Re]Insurance Team, with Miriam Smyth, Regulatory Counsel, speaking on a panel of experts on structuring, licensing and operating a Cayman insurer.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
23 Apr 2026

FamilyMart and Beyond: The Continuing Influence of the Privy Council’s Landmark Decision on Shareholder Litigation

The Privy Council's decision in FamilyMart China Holding Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp [2023] UKPC 33 is a landmark ruling that distinguishes the arbitrability of underlying shareholder disputes from the court's exclusive jurisdiction over just and equitable winding-up of a Cayman company.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Prospects of Asian Companies in U.S. Listings in 2026

Nasdaq introduced a series of rule changes in 2025 to raise minimum requirements for public float and offering size for certain new listings.

Website-Code-Cayman
20 Apr 2026

Avoiding The Nuclear Option: Buyout Orders In Just And Equitable Winding Up Proceedings

With the Cayman Islands being a preferred jurisdiction for the incorporation of investment vehicles, inevitably cases will arise where non-controlling shareholders complain that they are being unfairly prejudiced by conduct of those in control, and necessarily pursue those complaints by way of proceedings to wind up the subject company on the just and equitable ground. Where such complaints are well-founded, the outcome will often be an order putting the subject company into official liquidation.  But the Cayman courts also have the jurisdiction in such cases to make a range of other orders as alternatives to taking that nuclear option, and are indeed obliged to consider whether any of those alternative orders would provide a more appropriate solution to the complaints.[1] The Grand Court was recently required to conduct that analysis in the case of Re Position Mobile Ltd SEZC.[2]  The petitioning shareholder in that case had satisfied the Court that it would be just and equitable to wind up the company – since it had justifiably lost confidence in the probity of those in control, due to their serious and sustained misconduct and mismanagement – but positively sought a buyout order[3] as an alternative to a winding up.  The Court thus proceeded to consider whether the buyout order, or any other alternative order, would be more appropriate than ordering a winding up, and concluded that a buyout order was the fairest and most appropriate form of relief in the circumstances of that case. The authors will discuss the guidance which the Position Mobile case provides in that regard below, which should be considered together with the guidance provided by Re Madera Technology Fund (CI) Ltd,[4] particularly in respect of the approach that the Cayman courts can be expected to take when setting the appropriate valuation date for a buyout order, with a view to ensuring that the valuation is fair to each side.[5] [1] See Re Virginia Solution SPC Ltd (unrep. 28 July 2023, CICA) at [61]. [2] [2026] CIGC (FSD) 10 [3] Requiring the respondent shareholders to purchase its shares at a fair price. [4] (unrep. 21 Aug. 2024, Richards J). [5] For further detail, see the authors’ article on the Madera Technology case at https://www.applebyglobal.com/publications/no-looking-back-investor-held-to-buyout-at-current-value-of-shares/.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
7 Apr 2026

No Claim, No Injunction: What Does a Limited Partner Actually Own?

What equitable proprietary interest, if any, does a limited partner hold in the assets of a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership, and is that interest is sufficient to ground a proprietary injunction? These questions lie at the heart of Parker J’s recent judgment in the matter of Charitable DAF HoldCo, Ltd (in Official Liquidation), in which the Grand Court refused proprietary injunctive relief sought by joint official liquidators against former directors and associated entities. The judgment holds that the Company, as a limited partner in a Cayman ELP, had no equitable proprietary interest in the Fund’s underlying assets of the quality required to found the relief sought. While the court did not exclude the possibility of an LP having proprietary rights in an ELP’s assets, it held that on the particular facts of the case such rights were excluded.

Appleby-Website-Cayman2
30 Mar 2026

The Regulation of Cayman Islands Tokenised Funds – Clear Rules Now in Place

On 5 March 2026 the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment Bill), 2026, the Mutual Funds (Amendment) Bill, 2026 and the Private Funds (Amendment) Bill, 2026 were passed by the Parliament of the Cayman Islands with unanimous support, providing welcome clarity that Cayman Islands tokenised funds are regulated within Cayman’s existing Mutual Funds Act (MFA) and Private Funds Act (PFA) framework and do not fall within the scope of the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act (VASPA).

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
19 Mar 2026

Key Regulatory Requirements of SIBA Registered Persons in the Cayman Islands

Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA) attract regulatory requirements including annual reporting requirements with key filing deadlines falling in January and, typically, December each year. The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA)’s recently issued General Industry Notice to the effect that all SIBA Registered Persons will be additionally required to submit a Prudential Information Survey for the 2025 calendar year (by 31 March 2026) has signaled CIMA's continued focus on enhancing the resilience, transparency and prudential soundness of the securities investment business (SIB) sector in the Cayman Islands. Accordingly, this briefing reviews some of the other key regulatory and reporting obligations that attach to Registered Persons under SIBA, CIMA’s associated Rules and Statements of Guidance (SOG), the applicable Anti-Money Laundering Regulations (Cayman AML Regulations) the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) Regulations (Revised) (Cayman CRS Regulations) and, where applicable, The International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Act (Revised) (ES Act).