Crypto-currency offers an opportunity for impressive returns, and an investment fund gives investors access to opportunities that they may not otherwise be able to attain individually. However, as with all types of investments, crypto-currency funds are not without risk and there are steps that prudent investors should take to best position themselves in the event that the fund hits difficulties.
Whilst hoping for the best, investors should bear in mind that in a worst case scenario, a liquidator’s primary objective is to realise and distribute the fund’s assets, in the following order of priority: expenses of the liquidation, general unsecured creditors (service providers, liquidity providers etc), investor creditors (investors who are owed payments from the fund in relation to their character as member, such as in respect of redemptions or dividends) and investors (those who remain and participate only if there are surplus assets after payment of creditors and expenses).
There are three stages of a fund’s lifecycle at which investors can take steps to seek to improve their standing in the ultimate event that the fund runs into troubled times. It is generally the least proactive investor that is left bearing any losses.
During the initial investment
The liquidity of crypto-currency investments can be ideal for open ended investment funds (which allow investors to subscribe or redeem periodically based on a defined net asset value (NAV) whilst specific investments in the underlying technology may be more suited to closed-ended funds (usually raising an initial amount of capital tailored towards an investment strategy, with the opportunity to increase or realise the investment only at limited points in time). The Investment Manager’s (IMs) broad strategy will be set out in the fund’s offering documents, including key risk factors which should be reviewed in detail by potential investors. As an emerging asset class, crypto-currency funds will need to maintain the flexibility to respond to regulatory change and market trends that may develop more quickly than traditional asset classes.
Considerations relevant to both types of fund will include:
The structure of the board: specific experience with crypto-currencies both amongst the operational board members but also whether the independent directors are providing genuine oversight and specific value/knowledge.
What information is periodically provided or can be requested by investors to ensure compliance with investment criteria and responses to emerging risks. Investors may be able to negotiate enhanced access to information or circulation of investment data.
The basis upon which the fund values its investments and calculates the NAV.
Steps the fund proposes to protect its asset holding.
Whether investors are prevented from petitioning for the winding up of the fund.
Whether the fund will accept subscriptions and make redemptions utilising crypto-currency and the valuation interaction between NAV and that mechanism.
Investors in open ended funds should also consider:
The regularity with which NAV is calculated and the redemption period. Whether the investor can negotiate shorter redemption periods, or whether other investors are getting favourable terms.
The fund’s liquidity provision enabling it to reduce underlying asset turnover and align redemptions and subscriptions.
- Whether the fund’s investment strategy would be adversely affected by withdrawals and accommodate new subscriptions.
Investors in closed-ended funds should also consider:
The ultimate expiration date and strategy, together with the rights to extend the life of the fund.
Whether there are any ongoing capital call commitments.
During the course of the investment
Much of this will involve continuous checks against the criteria established at the investment stage: an investor should not allow the IM to rest on its laurels. Pay particular attention for:
Over concentration in excess of the fund’s stated investment parameters.
Delays in reported NAV.
Lack of clear strategy in dealing with significant market developments.
Unexpected and unexplained changes in the board or service providers.
Suspension or gating of redemptions and redemption payments.
Consistent returns despite varying or volatile market conditions.
An investor who has submitted a valid redemption request is paid in priority to an investor who has not, and so acting upon red flags can be the difference between getting paid or losing an investment. If the fund fails to pay redemption requests promptly, investors should consider taking legal action for an unpaid debt, including issuing a statutory demand or a petition that the fund be wound up. Whilst many jurisdictions contain provisions clawing back payments made to some creditors in favour of others when a fund is on the brink of insolvency, the Cayman Islands courts do not currently permit liquidators to clawback payments if they were made to stave off legal or regulatory action, and so the threat of such may be sufficient to procure payment or favourable treatment, rather than relying upon a distribution through the liquidation of the fund.
If the fund is unable to pay its creditors as they fall due (the Cayman Islands has a cash-flow insolvency test), then it may end up in an involuntary court supervised liquidation. Even in this situation, investors may take steps to protect their position by:
Notifying the liquidator of their interest, including any claim to creditor status arising from redemption requests or side-letters, the liquidators must report to stakeholders and distributions will be determined by the investor’s status as creditor or investor;
Seeking to join the liquidation committee of the fund, which will act as a steering board to the liquidation and could provide useful information;
Entering into funding arrangements with the liquidator, in exchange for a share in the upside of any recovery actions as well as increasing the pool available for general distribution;
Bidding in any asset realization process conducted by the liquidators;
Trading in any secondary market in distressed shares to crystallise current value and remove ongoing uncertainty.
At each stage of a fund’s life-cycle information is key: procuring access to information will enable the investor to seek to maximise its returns and react to underlying developments in crypto-currency.
Offshore AML Regulation and Enforcement in the Cayman Islands
In the February 2023 edition of Financier Worldwide, Miriam Smyth answers questions about AML Regula...
Offshore Private Funds and Offshore Managers: Divergent Regimes in the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands
Consideration should be given and appropriate advice should be sought as to what would be the most a...
Fund Finance Laws and Regulations 2023 – Cayman Islands
The Cayman Islands fund finance market has continued to see plenty of activity over the past 12 mont...
While the basic features of the trust remain, there are some notable differences in how trusts can b...
The Cayman Islands restructuring officer regime comes into force on 31 August 2022
These new proceedings will significantly enhance the Cayman Islands restructuring regime.
Norwich Pharmacal orders: the right medicine for third party disclosure of information and documents in the Cayman Islands
A Norwich Pharmacal order (NPO) is a disclosure order available in the Cayman Islands to compel a th...
The 2022 Cayman Islands Real Estate Guide
The Real Estate 2022 guide provides the latest legal information on the impact of disruptive technol...
Aircraft financing - a brief guide to Cayman
Legal and administrative service providers in the Cayman Islands such as Appleby can offer aircraft ...
Restructuring the offshore debt of Chinese Real Estate Developers
This article sets out how the current regimes in the Cayman Islands and the BVI can assist with rest...
Assignment, novation or sub-participation of loans
Transfers of loan portfolios between lending institutions have always been commonplace in the financ...