Economic Substance and Automatic Exchange of Tax Information

Published: 17 Mar 2020

Economic Substance: International Tax Co-Operation (Economic Substance) Law, (2020 Revision)

The new year ushered in a 2020 revision of the International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Law (ES Law).

The ES Law is supplemented by the Cayman Islands guidance for economic substance for geographically mobile activities (ES Guidance Notes), version 2.0 of which was published on 30 April 2019. We had anticipated the final publication of version 3.0 of the ES Guidance Notes during 2019, following the release of a consultation draft in late November of that year. No such publication occurred, however, and we now expect that updated ES Guidance Notes will not be released until mid-2020 at the earliest.

We strongly recommend that anyone who has not yet addressed the implications of the ES Law on their Cayman entities do so as a matter of urgency. Appleby would be pleased to assist in this endeavour. Please contact a member of our Regulatory Team or your usual Appleby contact.

Additionally, we encourage those who have already undertaken the classification exercise to remain mindful of the 2019 notification and reporting requirements and the anticipated release of updated ES Guidance Notes during 2020.

ES NOTIFICATION AND REPORTING

Operators of Cayman Islands exempted companies, LLCs and LLPs and foreign companies registered under the Companies Law are reminded that each such entity is required to file a 2019 notification form under the ES Law (ES Notification) by no later than 31 March 2020.

The ES Notification is filed by the entity’s registered office via the General Registry system of the Registrar of Companies of the Cayman Islands. The notification form is separate from the General Registry’s annual return for companies but, in terms of timing, the completion and filing of the ES Notification is a prerequisite to filing the annual return. Entities that fail to file their ES Notification and/or annual return by the deadline noted above will not be in good standing with the Registrar of Companies.

AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF TAX INFORMATION (AEOI)

The Cayman Islands Department of International Tax Cooperation (DITC) is in the process of building a new portal for CRS and FATCA registrations and reporting (DITC Portal). The DITC Portal is expected to be available 1 June 2020. All user accounts from the former AEOI Portal will be migrated to the new DITC Portal along with their assigned Financial Institution (FI) numbers.

The DITC will not be accepting any new FI registrations until the new DITC Portal is launched in June 2020.

Under the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (United States of America) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 and Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 (together, the New AEOI Regulations), the annual reporting deadline for FATCA and CRS has changed from 31 May to 31 July (of the year following the relevant reporting period). In recognition of the delayed launch of the new DITC Portal, the deadline for 2019 FATCA and CRS reporting (only) will be 18 September 2020.

The New AEOI Regulations also remove the requirements for an Authorising Person and a Principal Point of Contact to be an individual. These roles may now be filled by either an individual or an entity.

Several new Reportable Jurisdictions have been added for CRS purposes. Albania, Ecuador, Kazakhstan, Maldives, Nigeria, Oman, and Peru will be Reportable Jurisdictions for reports due in 2020 and onwards.

Country-by-country (CbC) reporting for multinational enterprises (MNEs) will also migrate to the new DITC Portal. On 2 March 2020, the DITC announced that the CbC reporting portal is scheduled to go offline on 25 March 2020 to facilitate the migration over to the new DITC Portal. It is anticipated that the CbC reporting will be available in the fourth quarter of 2020. The DITC also announced that MNE Groups with a fiscal year starting in the range 1 July 2018 – 31 December 2018 will be required to file their CbC report no later than 31 December 2020 and that CbC reports made by 31 December 2020 will not result in compliance measures being taken for late filing.

IMPORTANT DATES

31 March 2020: Deadline for 2019 ES Notification filings
June 2020: Launch of new DITC Portal for CRS and FATCA registrations and reporting
31 July: New deadline for FATCA and CRS annual reporting
18 September 2020: The deadline for 2019 FATCA and CRS reporting only given the new DITC Portal will only be fully functional beginning in June 2020

Economic Substance Online Tool

Appleby has an online Economic Substance Entity Classification Questionnaire which offers guidance through the economic substance regime of the Cayman Islands (as well as the regimes of Bermuda, the BVI, Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Jersey). It was developed by our legal and regulatory experts and is available online free of charge. If an entity is in scope of a jurisdiction’s economic substance requirements, the Questionnaire will provide a summary of steps required to meet those requirements.

More publications

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers

28 Jul 2026

Drelle Overturned in Latest UK Supreme Court Decision

The United Kingdom Supreme Court in its recent decision in Drelle v Servis-Terminal LLC [2026] UKSC 29 (Drelle SC) has overturned the controversial decision of the English Court of Appeal in Servis-Terminal LLC v Drelle [2025] EWCA Civ 62 (Drelle CA), and in doing so has provided welcome clarity on the effect of unrecognised foreign judgments in cross-border bankruptcy and insolvency contexts. This is likely to have a wide-reaching impact – not only in the UK but also offshore – and particularly in the British Virgin Islands following the recent decision in JJW Hotels & Resorts Holding Inc v Rhodes (BVIHCM2025/0296) (JJW Hotels) (which relied heavily on Drelle CA), and in the Cayman Islands where previous authorities had recognised the ability, in the corporate context, for petitioners to present winding up petitions on the basis of an unrecognised foreign judgment.

Daniel Mitchell, Harriet Ter-Berg, Jae Shin

24 Jul 2026

Thalassa Investments LP: Section 22 and Specific Discovery - Strategic Considerations for Limited Partners Seeking Information and Documents

In Thalassa Investments LP [2026] CIGC (FSD) 32, the Grand Court refused an application by limited partner petitioners for specific discovery from the general partner in just and equitable proceedings to wind up a Cayman Islands ELP. The ruling was against the backdrop of serious lack of probity allegations made against the general partner by the petitioners. Notwithstanding those allegations, the Grand Court declined to make orders requiring discovery of various categories of documents to be used at trial. The ruling brings into focus the multiple routes potentially open to limited partners seeking information and/or documents from an ELP where there are allegations of mismanagement by the general partner. The limited partner may issue substantive proceedings (or, as in this case, present a just and equitable winding up petition) against the general partner and partnership, and then obtain documents through the usual discovery process. Alternatively, the limited partner may pursue its substantive right to true and full information under section 22 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act first in order to help inform the bringing of a substantive claim, as was the approach in the Neoma (Abraaj) and the Port Fund litigation. Thalassa illustrates that the nature of the information sought, who holds it, and the legal basis on which disclosure is sought are all highly relevant to the outcome. The decision also highlights that section 22 and discovery serve different purposes, are governed by different legal tests and can produce different outcomes. The strategic question is not whether section 22 or the discovery process may be preferable in the abstract, but which legal framework best aligns with the limited partner’s objectives and the nature of the information sought.

Susan Fallan, Daniel Coelho, Hannah Oh

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring-562x340

14 Jul 2026

Directors Cannot Delay Shareholder Votes: Cayman Court Limits Postponement Powers

Eliot Simpson, Ray Leung, Steven Yuen

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance

13 Jul 2026

Guide to Loans & Secured Financing in the Cayman Islands 2026

This guide provides local insights into the legal and regulatory framework governing bank lending and finance. It covers key topics including bank loans versus debt securities, common forms of bank loan facilities, bridge financing, the roles of agents, trustees and lenders, and governing laws. It also examines the regulatory landscape, including capital, liquidity and disclosure requirements, the use of loan proceeds, cross-border lending, and interest rate and currency restrictions. In addition, the guide explores security interests and guarantees, the impact of fraudulent conveyance and similar doctrines on bank loan financing structures, intercreditor arrangements, loan terms and structures, and recent market developments.

Caroline Barton

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring

9 Jul 2026

A Warning to Litigants Seeking Funding: English High Court Clarifies the Limits of Litigation Privilege

Important for Cayman litigants, funders and attorneys given the growing use of third-party funding in disputes.

Harriet Ter-Berg, Alan Bercow, Sofia Kranjec

8 Jul 2026

A Cautionary Tale in Interim Injunctive Relief: Lessons from Dixon v Seymour

In a recent judgment of Chief Justice Ramsay-Hale, the Cayman Grand Court provided guidance on the necessary components of an application for interim injunctive relief. The ruling illustrates how an ex parte application may fail to satisfy the American Cyanamid test when unsupported by proper evidence.

Alan Bercow, William Spence

7 Jul 2026

CIMA’s 2026 Reinsurance Thematic Review: Focus Points for Boards

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published its 2026 Thematic Review of Reinsurance Companies (Thematic Review). This reflects fieldwork conducted by CIMA between mid-2025 and Q1 2026 at selected Class B(iii) and Class D licensed reinsurers. The focus being on compliance with the Insurance Act (as revised) and other applicable legislation, regulations, rules and statements of guidance as issued by CIMA centering around stress-testing, cash flow testing frameworks, capital and collateral adequacy management, and corporate governance. Corporate governance weaknesses account for 68% of all findings with the remaining 32% spread across stress-testing, cash flow testing capital and collateral adequacy. Notwithstanding these findings, CIMA has noted several good practices across all areas including, importantly, comprehensive risk management frameworks covering key risk areas and strong capital and collateral adequacy monitoring processes. With Cayman’s reinsurance sector having grown to an institutional scale, and over 110 licensed reinsurers writing in the order of US$30 billion in annual premiums against over US$100 billion in assets, this latest Thematic Review demonstrates development in CIMA’s supervisory expectations of Cayman’s licensed reinsurers. It represents a reflection of the jurisdiction’s increasingly sophisticated and maturing reinsurance market and reinforces that CIMA’s expectations align closely with the standards that onshore counterparty cedants, rating agencies and US state regulators already expect. We take this opportunity to review certain of the key findings alongside CIMA’s cross-sectoral 2026 Thematic Review on Outsourcing, note some of the good practices highlighted by CIMA and make some associated recommendations for Cayman reinsurers.

Jacob MacAdam, Martin Byers, Simon Raftopoulos, Dean Bennett, Miriam Smyth

25 Jun 2026

CIMA Enforcement Action in Focus: Reminders and Recommendations

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has recently published a number of Enforcement Notices that provide helpful context for regulated entities, including Licensees and Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA), seeking to understand and meet their ongoing regulatory obligations in the Cayman Islands. In early June 2026, CIMA exercised its enforcement powers under SIBA Section 17 to cancel the registrations of several SIBA Registered Persons on the basis that it had reasonable grounds to believe that such Registered Persons had failed to meet certain key regulatory obligations. The Appleby Team takes this opportunity to review the relevant findings and CIMA enforcement action; and to highlight certain key obligations that attach to regulated entities in the Cayman Islands.

Simon Raftopoulos, Martin Byers, Maree Martin, Menelik Miller, Miriam Smyth

23 Jun 2026

Important Cayman Islands Industry Advisory: Common Reporting Standard 2.0 and Economic Substance Updates

Further to the introduction of the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 (the CRS Amendment Regulations or CRS 2.0), the Cayman Islands Department for International Tax Cooperation (DITC) has issued an Industry Advisory flagging certain key updates in respect of Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and Economic Substance (ES) reporting in the Cayman Islands. Cayman Financial Institutions will be required file 2025 CRS Returns and Declarations by 31 July 2026, ahead of the online DITC Portal’s closure to facilitate its transition to XML Schema v3.0. ES courtesy reminders (which have historically been sent by email to designated Responsible Persons in advance of annual ES reporting deadlines) will no longer be issued such that Relevant Entities will need to independently track such deadlines themselves. Updated Individual and Entity CRS Self-Certification forms, aligned with CRS 2.0, are now available online via the DITC website.

Martin Byers, Maree Martin, Miriam Smyth, Menelik Miller

18 Jun 2026

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [2026] CIGC (FSD) 22, the Grand Court clarified the scope of joint provisional liquidators' powers following their appointment. In particular, the Court confirmed that the appointment of provisional liquidators does not automatically displace existing directors.

David Lee, Joe Dale