Cayman Grand Court orders liquidations of failed crypto companies to be subject to Court supervision on grounds of improved efficacy, expedition and economy

Published: 8 Apr 2025
Type: Insight

On 3 April 2025, the Grand Court ordered that the voluntary liquidations of two entities within the failed Axia Group, AXIA Network Foundation (ANF) and ANF MergeCo Ltd (MergeCo), be continued under its supervision pursuant to s.131(b) of the Companies Act, on the basis that official liquidations under court supervision will facilitate a more effective, economic or expeditious liquidation of the AXIA Entities, in the interests of their stakeholders.[1]

In its ex tempore ruling, the Court applied settled Cayman authority which confirms that the jurisdictional thresholds for obtaining supervision orders under s.131(b) of the Act are onerous, and it provided helpful guidance as to the factors it will take into account in conducting the evaluative process which that section requires.

The decision particularly demonstrates the desirability and utility of official court-supervised liquidation processes for the efficient and effective conduct of complex cross-border insolvency matters, not least in the digital asset space, a rapidly developing area of law and legal practice.

[1] In the Matter of AXIA Network Foundation (in Voluntary Liquidation) and In the Matter of ANF MergeCo Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) [2025] CIGC (FSD) 27


From crypto start-up to multijurisdictional group to liquidation

By way of background, the AXIA project was founded in Ontario in early 2018 for the purpose of creating and developing a cryptocurrency token.  Its corporate structure was moved offshore in 2019, and ultimately comprised a substantial number of entities in no less than 27 jurisdictions, whilst having raised investments totalling around USD 41 million globally from approximately 9,500 token holders.

The Group began facing regulatory challenges around mid-2020, with the Ontario Securities Commission investigating its promotion and sale of the AXIA Coin.  Despite its efforts to overcome regulatory concerns, including seeking a “fresh start” through the incorporation of ANF in April 2022, it was forced to suspend the trading of its AXIA Coin shortly thereafter, in October 2022, and appointed independent directors to assume control of ANF the following month – who in turn appointed Alvarez & Marsal as independent financial and restructuring advisors.

Thereafter, a strategy was developed for the wind-down of the AXIA Group, with the Cayman Islands being
the preferred jurisdiction, given its statutory merger regime and sophisticated regime for corporate liquidations.  As part of the wind-down process, MergeCo was incorporated, and several AXIA Group entities merged into it, in order to facilitate their liquidation within a single jurisdiction.

In the course of 2024, both MergeCo and ANF were then placed into voluntary liquidation, and their joint voluntary liquidators (JVLs) subsequently filed petitions to bring their voluntary liquidations under the supervision of the Grand Court pursuant to s.131(b) of the Act (on the basis noted above).  The JVLs also simultaneously applied for sanction, if appointed as joint official liquidators (JOLs), to seek recognition of the liquidations in the USA, pursuant to Chapter 15 of Title 11 of the United States Code, to address proceedings being pursued in the Wyoming courts against two former AXIA Group companies that had been dissolved, with their assets and liabilities having been assumed by ANF and MergeCo, respectively.

The Court’s evaluative process

As the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal held in Re Asia Private Credit Fund,[2] s.131(b) of the Companies Act provides jurisdictional thresholds which an applicant must overcome before a supervision order can be made, namely that there is the immediate potential that an official court-supervised liquidation will facilitate a more effective, economic or expeditious liquidation of the relevant entity, in the interests of its stakeholders.

In his ex tempore ruling, Justice Doyle applied that decision and held that the jurisdictional thresholds had been overcome for the following reasons, such that it was appropriate to make supervision orders in respect of each of ANF and MergeCo:

  1. The multijurisdictional issues relating to the status of cryptocurrency coin holders which may arise.
  1. The confidence in the Cayman liquidation process which the appointment of official liquidators (with duties to the Court) should provide to stakeholders. 
  1. The likelihood that issues of some complexity will arise in the course of the liquidations (including regarding proofs of debt and distributions) which make independent judicial oversight desirable. 
  1. The investigative powers afforded to official liquidators and the various provisions of the liquidation regime should facilitate more effective liquidations for stakeholders as a whole.
  1. The Supervision Orders will trigger a stay of proceedings pursuant to section 97 of the Companies Act.
  1. Judicial supervision may also facilitate the more economic liquidations of the companies and it should help to save costs by reducing the likelihood and possible magnitude of any dispute with the stakeholders.
  1. As Field JA observed in Re Asia Private Credit Fund, the investigative and other powers of an official liquidator are significantly greater than the abilities of a voluntary liquidator.
  1. The JOLs, with the sanction of the court, may file a Chapter 15 petition for recognition to address the Wyoming Proceedings; and any further applications for recognition and assistance which may be necessary in other relevant jurisdictions.

Having made the supervision orders, Justice Doyle then proceeded to grant the applications for sanction to file Chapter 15 petitions in the US Bankruptcy Court, seeking the recognition of the official liquidations of each of ANF and MergeCo as foreign main proceedings.

The Appleby team which made the supervision and sanction applications comprised Andrew Jackson (Partner and lead advocate), and Charlotte Walker (Senior Associate), as counsel to Christopher Kennedy and Alexander Lawson of A&M, then as JVLs (now JOLs) of ANF and MergeCo.

[2] [2020] 1 CILR 134

Key Contacts
Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance
13 Jul 2026

Guide to Loans & Secured Financing in the Cayman Islands 2026

This guide provides local insights into the legal and regulatory framework governing bank lending and finance. It covers key topics including bank loans versus debt securities, common forms of bank loan facilities, bridge financing, the roles of agents, trustees and lenders, and governing laws. It also examines the regulatory landscape, including capital, liquidity and disclosure requirements, the use of loan proceeds, cross-border lending, and interest rate and currency restrictions. In addition, the guide explores security interests and guarantees, the impact of fraudulent conveyance and similar doctrines on bank loan financing structures, intercreditor arrangements, loan terms and structures, and recent market developments.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
9 Jul 2026

A Warning to Litigants Seeking Funding: English High Court Clarifies the Limits of Litigation Privilege

Important for Cayman litigants, funders and attorneys given the growing use of third-party funding in disputes.

Appleby-Website-Fraud-and-Asset-Tracing
8 Jul 2026

A Cautionary Tale in Interim Injunctive Relief: Lessons from Dixon v Seymour

In a recent judgment of Chief Justice Ramsay-Hale, the Cayman Grand Court provided guidance on the necessary components of an application for interim injunctive relief. The ruling illustrates how an ex parte application may fail to satisfy the American Cyanamid test when unsupported by proper evidence.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
7 Jul 2026

CIMA’s 2026 Reinsurance Thematic Review: Focus Points for Boards

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published its 2026 Thematic Review of Reinsurance Companies (Thematic Review). This reflects fieldwork conducted by CIMA between mid-2025 and Q1 2026 at selected Class B(iii) and Class D licensed reinsurers. The focus being on compliance with the Insurance Act (as revised) and other applicable legislation, regulations, rules and statements of guidance as issued by CIMA centering around stress-testing, cash flow testing frameworks, capital and collateral adequacy management, and corporate governance. Corporate governance weaknesses account for 68% of all findings with the remaining 32% spread across stress-testing, cash flow testing capital and collateral adequacy. Notwithstanding these findings, CIMA has noted several good practices across all areas including, importantly, comprehensive risk management frameworks covering key risk areas and strong capital and collateral adequacy monitoring processes. With Cayman’s reinsurance sector having grown to an institutional scale, and over 110 licensed reinsurers writing in the order of US$30 billion in annual premiums against over US$100 billion in assets, this latest Thematic Review demonstrates development in CIMA’s supervisory expectations of Cayman’s licensed reinsurers. It represents a reflection of the jurisdiction’s increasingly sophisticated and maturing reinsurance market and reinforces that CIMA’s expectations align closely with the standards that onshore counterparty cedants, rating agencies and US state regulators already expect. We take this opportunity to review certain of the key findings alongside CIMA’s cross-sectoral 2026 Thematic Review on Outsourcing, note some of the good practices highlighted by CIMA and make some associated recommendations for Cayman reinsurers.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
25 Jun 2026

CIMA Enforcement Action in Focus: Reminders and Recommendations

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has recently published a number of Enforcement Notices that provide helpful context for regulated entities, including Licensees and Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA), seeking to understand and meet their ongoing regulatory obligations in the Cayman Islands. In early June 2026, CIMA exercised its enforcement powers under SIBA Section 17 to cancel the registrations of several SIBA Registered Persons on the basis that it had reasonable grounds to believe that such Registered Persons had failed to meet certain key regulatory obligations. The Appleby Team takes this opportunity to review the relevant findings and CIMA enforcement action; and to highlight certain key obligations that attach to regulated entities in the Cayman Islands.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
23 Jun 2026

Important Cayman Islands Industry Advisory: Common Reporting Standard 2.0 and Economic Substance Updates

Further to the introduction of the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 (the CRS Amendment Regulations or CRS 2.0), the Cayman Islands Department for International Tax Cooperation (DITC) has issued an Industry Advisory flagging certain key updates in respect of Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and Economic Substance (ES) reporting in the Cayman Islands. Cayman Financial Institutions will be required file 2025 CRS Returns and Declarations by 31 July 2026, ahead of the online DITC Portal’s closure to facilitate its transition to XML Schema v3.0. ES courtesy reminders (which have historically been sent by email to designated Responsible Persons in advance of annual ES reporting deadlines) will no longer be issued such that Relevant Entities will need to independently track such deadlines themselves. Updated Individual and Entity CRS Self-Certification forms, aligned with CRS 2.0, are now available online via the DITC website.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
18 Jun 2026

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [2026] CIGC (FSD) 22, the Grand Court clarified the scope of joint provisional liquidators' powers following their appointment. In particular, the Court confirmed that the appointment of provisional liquidators does not automatically displace existing directors.

Appleby-Website-Cayman2
17 Jun 2026

Property, Fairness and the Constitution: The Grand Court Marks the Boundaries of Freedom of Information

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has overturned a decision of the Ombudsman in a successful judicial review brought by Caribbean Utilities Company, Ltd. (CUC), represented by Appleby.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
28 Apr 2026

The Interplay Between Supervision Applications and Winding Up on the Just and Equitable Ground: Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC

In its recent judgment in Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC [2026] CIGC (FSD) 19, the Grand Court considered itself bound to make a supervision order pursuant to s.131(b) of the Companies Act, notwithstanding that the company was the subject of a pending just and equitable winding up (J&E) petition when its voluntary liquidation was commenced; and rejected an attack on the joint voluntary liquidators’ (JVLs) independence, which was principally based on a misreading of the JVLs’ evidence and lacked any objective foundation. The authors, who successfully represented the JVLs in obtaining the supervision order, discuss this important judgment further below – which is believed to be the first decision on the interplay between supervision applications and J&E proceedings under the Companies Act – and offer their views on the guidance that shareholders petitioning on the just and equitable ground may derive from it in future cases.  The challenge to the JVLs’ independence was rejected on the well-established principles which Doyle J discussed in Re Global Fidelity Bank [2021] 2 CILR 361, and is not discussed in further detail below.