[Re]Connect Cayman Islands 2026: Practical takeaways for Reinsurers, Cedants and Investors

Published: 23 Apr 2026
Type: Insight

The Cayman International Reinsurance Commercial Association (CIRCA) held its annual conference, [Re]Connect, last week at the Ritz-Carlton, Grand Cayman.

This year’s [Re]Connect has once again demonstrated Cayman’s growing influence in global reinsurance and the strength of the jurisdiction’s regulatory, professional and commercial ecosystem.

The event brought together 675 registered delegates, including reinsurers, cedants, major US law firms, audit firms, tax practices, asset managers, overseas regulators, industry leaders and rating agencies – as well as Appleby Cayman’s [Re]Insurance Team, with Miriam Smyth, Regulatory Counsel, speaking on a panel of experts on structuring, licensing and operating a Cayman insurer.


Day one focused primarily on the new-entrant market, and highlighted Cayman’s evolution as a leading reinsurance hub, tracking measured market growth and the regulatory ecosystem supporting it. Panels focused on the practical establishment of Cayman reinsurers and the strength of the jurisdiction’s principles‑based regulatory framework, aligned with international standards.

Day two focused on Cayman’s ambitions to strengthen its position as a global reinsurance hub. Discussions highlighted the jurisdiction’s proposal to apply for Qualified Jurisdiction status to improve access to US markets, alongside broader debate on asset‑liability discipline, jurisdictional fit and the growing role of technology (particularly the use of artificial intelligence and the opportunities and operational challenges this brings).

Day two panel sessions concluded with a discussion with the CEO of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) on the growth of the financial services sector, CIMA’s supervisory approach, increased engagement with overseas regulators and local industry sectors through consultations and in‑person meetings to further develop the licensee–CIMA relationship, as well as growth areas for the reinsurance sector over the next five to 10 years.

Key Practical Takeaways:

  1. Cayman’s Robust Regulatory Framework

CIMA continues to be a principles and risk-based regulator, aligned with the IAIS Insurance Core Principles – noting that CIMA is a founding IAIS member.

CIMA’s supervisory approach is evolving in response to global risks (including climate risk, artificial intelligence and increasingly complex cross-border reinsurance activity). CIMA works closely with overseas regulators, particularly US-based regulators supported by an extensive network of more than 70 bilateral and multilateral cooperation arrangements with international regulatory authorities, including a memorandum of understanding with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in the United States.

Looking ahead, CIMA’s priorities will be focused on introducing a new Managed General Agent regulatory framework, a proposed Class B(iv) licence, enhanced consolidated supervision and continued cross border coordination with international regulators, particularly with US-based regulators.

  1. Use of Private Assets in the Insurance Ecosystem

Another key takeaway from the conference was the growing influence of private capital, with private assets now deeply embedded in insurance balance sheets, and regulators and reinsurers increasingly focused on stress-testing balance sheets.

Panel discussion on this highlighted Cayman’s predominantly fully-funded reinsurance model, whereby assets remain on the ceding company’s balance sheet, alongside increased regulatory requirements and greater transparency amongst international regulators to ensure alignment with global standards.

  1. Geopolitics and the rise of Artificial Intelligence

Additionally, geopolitical uncertainty and climate risk are increasingly reshaping capital allocation and regulatory thinking. At the same time, artificial intelligence is moving rapidly from concept to execution in both life and property and casualty markets, presenting competitive advantages while introducing new governance and operational risk-management challenges for reinsurers.

Conclusion

[Re]Connect provided valuable opportunities to engage with regulators, industry leaders and international counterparties, and to exchange insights on the structural, capital and technological forces shaping the sector’s next phase of growth.

We thank CIRCA for hosting another excellent and well‑structured event and for continuing to foster meaningful dialogue that supports the development of Cayman’s evolving reinsurance sector.

Appleby’s [Re]Insurance Team remains right at the forefront of the Cayman reinsurance market and has extensive experience advising market participants across this sector on their legal and regulatory obligations.

For further information on or assistance with any of the matters referred to in this briefing please reach out to one of the Key Contacts listed below or to your usual Appleby point of contact.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance
13 Jul 2026

Guide to Loans & Secured Financing in the Cayman Islands 2026

This guide provides local insights into the legal and regulatory framework governing bank lending and finance. It covers key topics including bank loans versus debt securities, common forms of bank loan facilities, bridge financing, the roles of agents, trustees and lenders, and governing laws. It also examines the regulatory landscape, including capital, liquidity and disclosure requirements, the use of loan proceeds, cross-border lending, and interest rate and currency restrictions. In addition, the guide explores security interests and guarantees, the impact of fraudulent conveyance and similar doctrines on bank loan financing structures, intercreditor arrangements, loan terms and structures, and recent market developments.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
9 Jul 2026

A Warning to Litigants Seeking Funding: English High Court Clarifies the Limits of Litigation Privilege

Important for Cayman litigants, funders and attorneys given the growing use of third-party funding in disputes.

Appleby-Website-Fraud-and-Asset-Tracing
8 Jul 2026

A Cautionary Tale in Interim Injunctive Relief: Lessons from Dixon v Seymour

In a recent judgment of Chief Justice Ramsay-Hale, the Cayman Grand Court provided guidance on the necessary components of an application for interim injunctive relief. The ruling illustrates how an ex parte application may fail to satisfy the American Cyanamid test when unsupported by proper evidence.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
7 Jul 2026

CIMA’s 2026 Reinsurance Thematic Review: Focus Points for Boards

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published its 2026 Thematic Review of Reinsurance Companies (Thematic Review). This reflects fieldwork conducted by CIMA between mid-2025 and Q1 2026 at selected Class B(iii) and Class D licensed reinsurers. The focus being on compliance with the Insurance Act (as revised) and other applicable legislation, regulations, rules and statements of guidance as issued by CIMA centering around stress-testing, cash flow testing frameworks, capital and collateral adequacy management, and corporate governance. Corporate governance weaknesses account for 68% of all findings with the remaining 32% spread across stress-testing, cash flow testing capital and collateral adequacy. Notwithstanding these findings, CIMA has noted several good practices across all areas including, importantly, comprehensive risk management frameworks covering key risk areas and strong capital and collateral adequacy monitoring processes. With Cayman’s reinsurance sector having grown to an institutional scale, and over 110 licensed reinsurers writing in the order of US$30 billion in annual premiums against over US$100 billion in assets, this latest Thematic Review demonstrates development in CIMA’s supervisory expectations of Cayman’s licensed reinsurers. It represents a reflection of the jurisdiction’s increasingly sophisticated and maturing reinsurance market and reinforces that CIMA’s expectations align closely with the standards that onshore counterparty cedants, rating agencies and US state regulators already expect. We take this opportunity to review certain of the key findings alongside CIMA’s cross-sectoral 2026 Thematic Review on Outsourcing, note some of the good practices highlighted by CIMA and make some associated recommendations for Cayman reinsurers.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
25 Jun 2026

CIMA Enforcement Action in Focus: Reminders and Recommendations

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has recently published a number of Enforcement Notices that provide helpful context for regulated entities, including Licensees and Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA), seeking to understand and meet their ongoing regulatory obligations in the Cayman Islands. In early June 2026, CIMA exercised its enforcement powers under SIBA Section 17 to cancel the registrations of several SIBA Registered Persons on the basis that it had reasonable grounds to believe that such Registered Persons had failed to meet certain key regulatory obligations. The Appleby Team takes this opportunity to review the relevant findings and CIMA enforcement action; and to highlight certain key obligations that attach to regulated entities in the Cayman Islands.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
23 Jun 2026

Important Cayman Islands Industry Advisory: Common Reporting Standard 2.0 and Economic Substance Updates

Further to the introduction of the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 (the CRS Amendment Regulations or CRS 2.0), the Cayman Islands Department for International Tax Cooperation (DITC) has issued an Industry Advisory flagging certain key updates in respect of Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and Economic Substance (ES) reporting in the Cayman Islands. Cayman Financial Institutions will be required file 2025 CRS Returns and Declarations by 31 July 2026, ahead of the online DITC Portal’s closure to facilitate its transition to XML Schema v3.0. ES courtesy reminders (which have historically been sent by email to designated Responsible Persons in advance of annual ES reporting deadlines) will no longer be issued such that Relevant Entities will need to independently track such deadlines themselves. Updated Individual and Entity CRS Self-Certification forms, aligned with CRS 2.0, are now available online via the DITC website.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
18 Jun 2026

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [2026] CIGC (FSD) 22, the Grand Court clarified the scope of joint provisional liquidators' powers following their appointment. In particular, the Court confirmed that the appointment of provisional liquidators does not automatically displace existing directors.

Appleby-Website-Cayman2
17 Jun 2026

Property, Fairness and the Constitution: The Grand Court Marks the Boundaries of Freedom of Information

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has overturned a decision of the Ombudsman in a successful judicial review brought by Caribbean Utilities Company, Ltd. (CUC), represented by Appleby.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
28 Apr 2026

The Interplay Between Supervision Applications and Winding Up on the Just and Equitable Ground: Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC

In its recent judgment in Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC [2026] CIGC (FSD) 19, the Grand Court considered itself bound to make a supervision order pursuant to s.131(b) of the Companies Act, notwithstanding that the company was the subject of a pending just and equitable winding up (J&E) petition when its voluntary liquidation was commenced; and rejected an attack on the joint voluntary liquidators’ (JVLs) independence, which was principally based on a misreading of the JVLs’ evidence and lacked any objective foundation. The authors, who successfully represented the JVLs in obtaining the supervision order, discuss this important judgment further below – which is believed to be the first decision on the interplay between supervision applications and J&E proceedings under the Companies Act – and offer their views on the guidance that shareholders petitioning on the just and equitable ground may derive from it in future cases.  The challenge to the JVLs’ independence was rejected on the well-established principles which Doyle J discussed in Re Global Fidelity Bank [2021] 2 CILR 361, and is not discussed in further detail below.