[Re]Connect Cayman Islands 2026: Practical takeaways for Reinsurers, Cedants and Investors

Published: 23 Apr 2026
Type: Insight

The Cayman International Reinsurance Commercial Association (CIRCA) held its annual conference, [Re]Connect, last week at the Ritz-Carlton, Grand Cayman.

This year’s [Re]Connect has once again demonstrated Cayman’s growing influence in global reinsurance and the strength of the jurisdiction’s regulatory, professional and commercial ecosystem.

The event brought together 675 registered delegates, including reinsurers, cedants, major US law firms, audit firms, tax practices, asset managers, overseas regulators, industry leaders and rating agencies – as well as Appleby Cayman’s [Re]Insurance Team, with Miriam Smyth, Regulatory Counsel, speaking on a panel of experts on structuring, licensing and operating a Cayman insurer.


Day one focused primarily on the new-entrant market, and highlighted Cayman’s evolution as a leading reinsurance hub, tracking measured market growth and the regulatory ecosystem supporting it. Panels focused on the practical establishment of Cayman reinsurers and the strength of the jurisdiction’s principles‑based regulatory framework, aligned with international standards.

Day two focused on Cayman’s ambitions to strengthen its position as a global reinsurance hub. Discussions highlighted the jurisdiction’s proposal to apply for Qualified Jurisdiction status to improve access to US markets, alongside broader debate on asset‑liability discipline, jurisdictional fit and the growing role of technology (particularly the use of artificial intelligence and the opportunities and operational challenges this brings).

Day two panel sessions concluded with a discussion with the CEO of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) on the growth of the financial services sector, CIMA’s supervisory approach, increased engagement with overseas regulators and local industry sectors through consultations and in‑person meetings to further develop the licensee–CIMA relationship, as well as growth areas for the reinsurance sector over the next five to 10 years.

Key Practical Takeaways:

  1. Cayman’s Robust Regulatory Framework

CIMA continues to be a principles and risk-based regulator, aligned with the IAIS Insurance Core Principles – noting that CIMA is a founding IAIS member.

CIMA’s supervisory approach is evolving in response to global risks (including climate risk, artificial intelligence and increasingly complex cross-border reinsurance activity). CIMA works closely with overseas regulators, particularly US-based regulators supported by an extensive network of more than 70 bilateral and multilateral cooperation arrangements with international regulatory authorities, including a memorandum of understanding with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in the United States.

Looking ahead, CIMA’s priorities will be focused on introducing a new Managed General Agent regulatory framework, a proposed Class B(iv) licence, enhanced consolidated supervision and continued cross border coordination with international regulators, particularly with US-based regulators.

  1. Use of Private Assets in the Insurance Ecosystem

Another key takeaway from the conference was the growing influence of private capital, with private assets now deeply embedded in insurance balance sheets, and regulators and reinsurers increasingly focused on stress-testing balance sheets.

Panel discussion on this highlighted Cayman’s predominantly fully-funded reinsurance model, whereby assets remain on the ceding company’s balance sheet, alongside increased regulatory requirements and greater transparency amongst international regulators to ensure alignment with global standards.

  1. Geopolitics and the rise of Artificial Intelligence

Additionally, geopolitical uncertainty and climate risk are increasingly reshaping capital allocation and regulatory thinking. At the same time, artificial intelligence is moving rapidly from concept to execution in both life and property and casualty markets, presenting competitive advantages while introducing new governance and operational risk-management challenges for reinsurers.

Conclusion

[Re]Connect provided valuable opportunities to engage with regulators, industry leaders and international counterparties, and to exchange insights on the structural, capital and technological forces shaping the sector’s next phase of growth.

We thank CIRCA for hosting another excellent and well‑structured event and for continuing to foster meaningful dialogue that supports the development of Cayman’s evolving reinsurance sector.

Appleby’s [Re]Insurance Team remains right at the forefront of the Cayman reinsurance market and has extensive experience advising market participants across this sector on their legal and regulatory obligations.

For further information on or assistance with any of the matters referred to in this briefing please reach out to one of the Key Contacts listed below or to your usual Appleby point of contact.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
7 Aug 2026

New CIMA Rules on AML/CFT/CPF Compliance and Financial Sanctions Issued in the Cayman Islands

On 20 July 2026, further to an industry consultation, the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) published the following two new Rules set to introduce binding risk management, governance, sanctions screening and other compliance requirements for regulated financial service providers in the Cayman Islands: (i) Rule on Effective Compliance Programmes for the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing for Financial Services Providers (AML Rule); and (ii) Rule on Compliance with Financial Sanctions and Targeted Financial Sanctions (Sanctions Rule and, together with the AML Rule, the Rules). All CIMA-regulated financial services providers, including investment funds, insurers and reinsurers that are conducting ‘relevant financial business’ as defined under the Proceeds of Crime Act (Revised) (POCA) (FSP), are encouraged to review and update their documented framework of AML/CFT/CPF and sanctions compliance policies, procedures, controls, oversight and reporting mechanisms (Compliance Programmes) to ensure compliance with the Rules by the time they come into force on 18 September 2026.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
5 Aug 2026

Good faith in action, not just belief: the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa and its significance in the Cayman Islands

May a company director depart from a strategy his board has agreed, in the sincere belief that he knows a better route to the company’s success? In Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa [2026] UKSC 21, the Supreme Court held that, whatever the answer, a director cannot pursue his own strategy by concealing it from, and misleading, his fellow directors. The Court confirmed that the good faith duty is not confined to a director’s sincerely held view of the company’s best interests; it also governs the means by which the director acts. The decision is an authoritative statement of the content of the fiduciary duty of loyalty, and is likely to be influential in the Cayman Islands. The decision will interest directors, those who advise or appoint them, and stakeholders affected by directors’ conduct.

Website-Code-Cayman-2
30 Jul 2026

Contingent Creditors, Standing And The Winding Up Jurisdiction: Analysing Re Petrosaudi International

The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal has delivered a highly significant judgment in Re PetroSaudi International.[1] The Court clarified the circumstances in which an alleged contingent creditor will have standing to petition to wind up a company under section 94(1)(b) of the Companies Act, and confirmed that there is no jurisdiction to make a winding up order on an ex parte without notice basis.[2] Our article analyses the Court of Appeal’s decision, and considers its implications for insolvency practitioners.

Website-Code-Cayman-1
30 Jul 2026

Final Means Final: Wei v Wang and the Common Law Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the Cayman Islands

English Court Reaffirms Pro-Enforcement Approach to Foreign Judgments In Wei v Wang [2026] EWHC 1892 (Comm), the Court confirmed that exceptional avenues of review do not undermine the finality of a judgment and reiterated the limited scope of the natural justice defence.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
28 Jul 2026

Drelle Overturned in Latest UK Supreme Court Decision

The United Kingdom Supreme Court in its recent decision in Drelle v Servis-Terminal LLC [2026] UKSC 29 (Drelle SC) has overturned the controversial decision of the English Court of Appeal in Servis-Terminal LLC v Drelle [2025] EWCA Civ 62 (Drelle CA), and in doing so has provided welcome clarity on the effect of unrecognised foreign judgments in cross-border bankruptcy and insolvency contexts. This is likely to have a wide-reaching impact – not only in the UK but also offshore – and particularly in the British Virgin Islands following the recent decision in JJW Hotels & Resorts Holding Inc v Rhodes (BVIHCM2025/0296) (JJW Hotels) (which relied heavily on Drelle CA), and in the Cayman Islands where previous authorities had recognised the ability, in the corporate context, for petitioners to present winding up petitions on the basis of an unrecognised foreign judgment.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
24 Jul 2026

Thalassa Investments LP: Section 22 and Specific Discovery - Strategic Considerations for Limited Partners Seeking Information and Documents

In Thalassa Investments LP [2026] CIGC (FSD) 32, the Grand Court refused an application by limited partner petitioners for specific discovery from the general partner in just and equitable proceedings to wind up a Cayman Islands ELP. The ruling was against the backdrop of serious lack of probity allegations made against the general partner by the petitioners. Notwithstanding those allegations, the Grand Court declined to make orders requiring discovery of various categories of documents to be used at trial.   The ruling brings into focus the multiple routes potentially open to limited partners seeking information and/or documents from an ELP where there are allegations of mismanagement by the general partner. The limited partner may issue substantive proceedings (or, as in this case, present a just and equitable winding up petition) against the general partner and partnership, and then obtain documents through the usual discovery process. Alternatively, the limited partner may pursue its substantive right to true and full information under section 22 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act first in order to help inform the bringing of a substantive claim, as was the approach in the Neoma (Abraaj) and the Port Fund litigation. Thalassa illustrates that the nature of the information sought, who holds it, and the legal basis on which disclosure is sought are all highly relevant to the outcome. The decision also highlights that section 22 and discovery serve different purposes, are governed by different legal tests and can produce different outcomes. The strategic question is not whether section 22 or the discovery process may be preferable in the abstract, but which legal framework best aligns with the limited partner’s objectives and the nature of the information sought.

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance
13 Jul 2026

Guide to Loans & Secured Financing in the Cayman Islands 2026

This guide provides local insights into the legal and regulatory framework governing bank lending and finance. It covers key topics including bank loans versus debt securities, common forms of bank loan facilities, bridge financing, the roles of agents, trustees and lenders, and governing laws. It also examines the regulatory landscape, including capital, liquidity and disclosure requirements, the use of loan proceeds, cross-border lending, and interest rate and currency restrictions. In addition, the guide explores security interests and guarantees, the impact of fraudulent conveyance and similar doctrines on bank loan financing structures, intercreditor arrangements, loan terms and structures, and recent market developments.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
9 Jul 2026

A Warning to Litigants Seeking Funding: English High Court Clarifies the Limits of Litigation Privilege

Important for Cayman litigants, funders and attorneys given the growing use of third-party funding in disputes.

Appleby-Website-Fraud-and-Asset-Tracing
8 Jul 2026

A Cautionary Tale in Interim Injunctive Relief: Lessons from Dixon v Seymour

In a recent judgment of Chief Justice Ramsay-Hale, the Cayman Grand Court provided guidance on the necessary components of an application for interim injunctive relief. The ruling illustrates how an ex parte application may fail to satisfy the American Cyanamid test when unsupported by proper evidence.