In September HMRC published revisions to its inheritance tax (IHT) manuals relating to its interpretation of where a specialty debt (a specialty) is sited. There has been little commentary on the revisions, even though they provide certainty for some.

But first, what is a specialty? And second, why might it be of interest to someone who is not domiciled (actual or deemed) in the UK (a non-domiciliary)?

A specialty is more usually a debt created under a deed, which is what I shall focus on.

As a general rule, assets located in the UK are subject to UK IHT regardless of the domicile of the owner. Non-UK situs assets are ‘excluded property’ for UK IHT purposes if owned by a non-domiciliary. Foreign situs assets settled on trust by a non-domiciliary can be permanently excluded from IHT.

Where a debt is sited normally follows the debtor’s residence. However, the situs of a specialty which is enforceable by action historically has been determined by reference to the physical location of the deed and not the debtor’s residence. This meant that keeping the deed outside the UK resulted in such debt being foreign property.

This is especially useful in relation to a debt owed to an individual who is a non-domiciliary. Such debt would be UK sited if the debtor is UK resident unless it is a speciality and thus free of IHT unless the creditor becomes UK domiciled.

A specialty settled by a non-domiciliary on trust would be excluded property and as such not be subject to transfer and periodic charges, potentially permanently.

Furthermore, offshore trustees could lend money to UK resident beneficiaries without being deemed to be holding UK assets with UK tax payment and reporting requirements.

Accordingly, a specialty constituted a commonly used, effective method of mitigating IHT exposure for non-domiciliaries and trustees.

In 2013 HMRC updated its manuals, stating it believed “that…debts are situated where the debtor resides”, thus changing a specialty to a simple contract debt for tax purposes.

Trustees with loans to UK resident beneficiaries would be deemed to be holding UK assets and be subject to UK tax payment and reporting requirements. Non-domiciliaries owed money by UK residents would likewise be deemed to be holding UK assets.

Despite requests for clarification from professional bodies, in 2014 HMRC stated that all debts “are likely to be located” where the debtor is resident and that it would refer all cases involving specialties to its technical team. This left much uncertainty.

HMRC has now given some clarification, although it is questionable whether its revisions are entirely correct.

HMRC will generally adopt the following approach:

Where the debt is secured on land or other tangible property situated in the UK, the situs of the debt will also be in the UK. The situs of the debt will follow the interest of the creditor in the secured property and not the personal obligation of the debtor to repay.

Where the debt is unsecured, the situs of the debt is usually where the deed evidencing the debt is found. However, where both debtor and creditor are UK resident, HMRC may argue that the debt is UK property.

Planning for IHT using specialties remains an option but should be approached with caution and bearing in mind the UK general anti-avoidance rule. Trustees should have examined such debts under the requirement to correct provisions.

As for the Channel Islands, there is no concept of a deed under Guernsey or Jersey law. However, a deed governed under a law other than that of Guernsey or Jersey may be expressed to be enforceable only in Guernsey or Jersey (as the case may be) and physically held in the jurisdiction so as to be a specialty.

Type

Insight

Locations

Guernsey

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
30 Jul 2021 |

Fighting international fraud

First published in New Law Journal, July 2021. Appleby partners Anthony William and Jared Dann an...

Contributors: Jared Dann, Claire Corkish
20 May 2021 |

The Gender Pay Gap Debate – a response to comments on social media

As a lawyer the majority of articles we write are about a particular case or a legal issue – which...

4 May 2021 |

New Private Investment Funds in Guernsey

In December 2020, the Guernsey Financial Services Commission (Commission) published a consultation p...

Contributors: Oratile Jonas
16 Mar 2021 |

Guernsey Structures - The Cannabis Investment Conundrum

Jurisdictions around the world have adopted different positions in relation to the legality of the c...

12 Mar 2021 |

Material adverse change clauses in light of the Covid-19 pandemic

Experts from each of our key global offices provide jurisdiction specific advice and answer question...

8 Mar 2021 |

Appleby Celebrates International Women’s Day

International Women’s Day is celebrated annually in support of gender equality and equal participa...

23 Feb 2021 |

Fit and Proper in the Channel Islands – A Regulatory Enforcement Update

It is sometimes easy to forget with all that has happened over the last 12 months that there was a w...

27 Jan 2021 |

Levies, registration and all that jazz

Regulatory markets evolve at various speeds and the data protection regime is one example of a marke...

6 Jan 2021 |

Executors navigating the “perfect (company) storm”

Corporate governance has become one of the most hotly debated topics in recent years. Whether it be ...

Contributors: Paula Fry