One of the “self-evident truths” of the Cayman funds industry is the practice, outlawed in many other common law jurisdictions, of indemnification of directors from the assets of the company. One litigant recently attempted, and failed, to attack the indemnity afforded to a professional director on what were somewhat speculative grounds. However, the judgment serves as a useful reminder that directors’ indemnities are not “inalienable rights” but must always be incorporated into the contract between the director and the company in order for directors to rely on them.

Ms Cummings was a professional independent director, and former director of Tangerine Investment Management Limited (In Official Liquidation) (Tangerine), a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Mr Goodman was assigned the cause of action against Ms Cummings by Tangerine’s liquidators. Mr Goodman alleged that Ms Cummings had breached the fiduciary and common law duties that she owed, qua director, to Tangerine. Ms Cummings denied such breaches and further argued that she was entitled to rely upon the various indemnification provisions contained within Tangerine’s articles of association. Mr Goodman argued that the indemnification provisions in Tangerine’s articles were not incorporated into Ms Cummings’ appointment as a director of Tangerine, and in any event that she was not to be considered an “indemnified person” pursuant to Tangerine’s articles, as she was a former director of Tangerine.

With respect to the first issue, Justice Mangatal held that the following legal principles applied: (i) articles of association are not, in themselves, a contract between the company and its directors; (ii) however, if a director is appointed or employed on the footing of the articles (or certain provisions within them), their terms are embodied in and form part of the contract between the director and the company; (iii) where a director is engaged without any separate or special terms of engagement, the Court will more readily conclude that the articles contain terms upon which the director accepts appointment; and (iv) comparatively little is required to satisfy the Court that an indemnity provision is incorporated in the contract made when the company appoints a director. Justice Mangatal found that the evidence in this case pointed clearly to Ms Cummings only accepting the appointment on the basis of satisfactory indemnification, and therefore concluded that the indemnification provisions in the articles were incorporated into Ms Cummings’ appointment.

On the second issue, Justice Mangatal asked what a reasonable person, having all the background knowledge known to the parties would have understood the indemnity provision to mean, applied a previous decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, and held that when interpreting a contract where the result that would be produced by one party’s suggested interpretation of the articles would be odd or unreasonable, clear wording is required to persuade the Court that the odd or unreasonable result was intended. Justice Mangatal was not persuaded by Mr Goodman’s argument, and ultimately rejected it on the basis that his proposed interpretation of the indemnification clause would lead to a bizarre result, whereby Ms Cummings would be indemnified whilst a director, and after her death (as a result of the definition of “Indemnified Person” in the Articles including a director’s executors, administrators, personal representatives or successors or assigns), but not in the intervening period.

It is clear from Justice Mangatal’s judgment that the Cayman Court is willing to give directors the full benefit of any indemnification provisions contained in the articles but not without first carefully examining the evidence as to the incorporation and construction of those provisions.

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
30 Jun 2020 |

Protecting Personal Data – the New Normal

One unanticipated consequence of the COVID pandemic has been the huge increase in the collection of ...

Contributors: Jennifer Parsons
29 Jun 2020 |

Cayman Regulatory Newsletter Q2 2020

Appleby Cayman’s second quarterly publication of the year focuses on regulatory developments, incl...

12 Jun 2020 |

Investment Funds: Opportunities During Covid-19

Fund managers are as affected as anyone by the coronavirus shutdown and while many fund managers con...

26 May 2020 |

Economic Substance in the time of COVID-19

Cayman, like many other jurisdictions, introduced its ES Law in response to international pressure t...

26 May 2020 |

Technology & Innovation Update Q2 2020

Technological developments have been accelerating at an unprecedented pace in Asia - the first regio...

7 May 2020 |

Derivatives – Cayman Counterparty Considerations in Market Uncertainty

In this briefing we consider the enforceability of common set-off clauses found in OTC derivative tr...

Contributors: Dean Bennett
7 May 2020 |

E-signatures – Who needs ink anyway?

The global spread of COVID-19 and the sustained containment protocols in place including social dist...

Contributors: Peter Colegate
5 May 2020 |

The 2020 Cayman Islands Real Estate guide

This country-specific Q&A provides features information on the impact of disruptive technologies...

17 Mar 2020 |

Cayman Regulatory Newsletter Q1 2020

Appleby Cayman’s first quarterly publication of the year focuses on the topics making waves now, i...