Cayman Islands’ Limited Liability Partnership Law, 2017 comes into force

Published: 15 Jun 2017
Type: Insight

We are pleased to report that the Limited Liability Partnership Law, 2017 (Law) came into force on 5 June 2017, making the Cayman Islands limited liability partnership (LLP) available for the first time in the jurisdiction. The Law provides for the formation, registration and operation of an LLP. We expect the regulations under the Law to be gazetted shortly.


What is an LLP?

An LLP is a statutory entity with limited liability. The key feature that distinguishes an LLP from a limited partnership registered under one of the Cayman Islands’ other partnership statutes (LP) is the LLP’s independent legal personality; the Law provides for the formation of an LLP as an entity with legal personality other than a body corporate which is separate and distinct from the partners in the LLP. The affairs of an LLP are governed by its partnership agreement. Unless otherwise provided in its partnership agreement, an LLP shall be capable of exercising all the functions of a natural person of full capacity irrespective of any question of benefit.

Other key features of an LLP

An LLP can be formed to carry on a business for any lawful purpose provided it has at least two partners.

The registration of an LLP is simple, requiring the filing of a registration statement and payment of the appropriate fee. If the LLP is to have a corporate managing partner or a managing partner which is a partnership to be registered under the Law, a certificate of incorporation or certificate of registration, as the case may be, and a certificate of good standing in respect of that managing partner will also be required. The proposed name of the LLP must include “LLP”, “L.L.P.” or “Limited Liability Partnership” and should be checked in advance with the Registrar of Limited Liability Partnerships (Registrar).

With a few exceptions, no partner or former partner of an LLP shall be liable for any debt or loss of the LLP, including any debt or loss caused by the act or omission of another partner or former partner in the LLP. Nothing in a partnership agreement may deprive the partners of this benefit. However, (i) a partner or former partner in an LLP shall be liable for any loss caused by a negligent act or omission of that partner or former partner where that partner or former partner assumed an express duty of care to a person and acted in breach of that duty; and (ii) partners in an LLP may agree, as between partners, to indemnify any of the partners or any former partner in respect of any debt or loss.

Unlike an LP, an LLP does not distinguish between general partners and limited partners. An LLP may have one or more managing partners with the responsibilities set out in the Law and under its partnership agreement, failing which for the purposes of the Law all partners will be managing partners.

There are no residency requirements for partners in an LLP, but an LLP must have a registered office in the Cayman Islands at which it is required to maintain, among other things, a register of partners (indicating which partners, if any, are managing partners) and a register of mortgages, both of which are to be open for inspection by the public.

An LLP may apply for a 50-year tax undertaking certificate from the Cayman Islands Government if the application is accompanied by a declaration by the LLP that it shall not undertake business with the public in the Cayman Islands other than so far as may be necessary for the carrying on of the business of that LLP outside the Cayman Islands.

On meeting prescribed conditions, existing Cayman partnerships may convert into LLPs and foreign LLPs may continue into the Cayman Islands as LLPs under the Law.

Uses of an LLP

We expect the LLP structure will be popular with professional services firms in the Cayman Islands, which have traditionally been established as general partnerships. However, the Law has been drafted broadly enough for LLPs to be used for international financial services transactions as an alternative to companies or LPs.

The Law is the natural outcome of the Cayman Islands paying attention and responding to the input and needs of global industry and its participants and further consolidates the Cayman Islands’ position as a leading offshore jurisdiction.

Share
More publications
IWD website preview
9 Mar 2026

International Women’s Day 2026 Roundtable: Rights. Justice. Action. For all women and girls.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
3 Mar 2026

Cayman Islands Regulatory Round Up - Winter 2025/26

The round-up provides a concise yet thorough summary of regulatory developments relevant to financial service providers (FSPs) and other stakeholders in the Cayman Islands. It highlights key legislative changes, publications by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA), updates on financial sanctions, and anticipates upcoming changes through "horizon scanning”. Links to the underlying CIMA publications, as well as related Appleby published briefings and e-alerts are available throughout this document. The information provided is “as of” 28 May 2025.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
16 Feb 2026

Preparing for and Managing a CIMA Onsite Inspection

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) is empowered, under the Monetary Authority Act and certain other regulatory laws, to inspect regulated financial service providers (FSP) in the Cayman Islands such as banks, trust companies, administrators, investment managers and virtual asset service providers for compliance with applicable regulatory frameworks. CIMA routinely conducts onsite inspections of such regulated entities – which can be full-scope (involving a review of all areas of a regulated entity's business operations) or thematically focused on specific areas such as corporate governance and/or internal controls, policies and procedures pertaining to AML/CFT/CPF. With the breadth and number of onsite inspections carried out by CIMA having increased through 2024 and 2025 we consider, in this briefing: (i) the CIMA onsite inspection process; (ii) the latest feedback available from CIMA in respect of inspections conducted to date; and (iii) some frequently asked questions in relation to CIMA onsite inspections.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
16 Feb 2026

Injunctive Relief in Another Form? Cayman Court's Jurisdiction to Appoint JPLs Despite Ongoing Arbitration

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [link],[1] the Grand Court confirmed that it has jurisdiction to appoint provisional liquidators notwithstanding the fact that the company’s shareholders are engaged in an arbitration over its affairs, as mandated by a binding arbitration agreement. This article considers the decision and its implications.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
11 Feb 2026

When the Court intervenes… and when it does not: Grand Court Reaffirms Limited Curial Intervention in Support of Foreign Arbitrations

The Financial Services Division of the Grand Court’s judgment in In the matter of A v B & C (FSD 270 of 2025) provides a timely reminder of the proper boundaries between national courts and international arbitration tribunals in respect of the grant of interim relief. The decision underscores the Cayman Islands' commitment to the principle of limited curial intervention and confirms that the Court’s powers under section 54 of the Arbitration Act 2012 are ancillary to the arbitral process and are only to be exercised when the tribunal cannot provide effective relief itself. The judgment helpfully sets out clear parameters for those seeking ancillary relief and highlights that the Cayman courts will support arbitration proceedings without supplanting them.

Website-Code-Cayman-2
5 Feb 2026

Recusal For Apparent Bias Is Not A New Frontier

In Re New Frontier Health Corporation,[1] Justice Doyle decided to recuse himself, such that he would not hear the trial listed to commence weeks later, on the basis that he made findings in his recent Re 51job Inc judgment, as to the reliability and credibility of the same two experts who would give evidence at the New Frontier trial. The New Frontier judgment represents a further endorsement by the Cayman courts of the fundamental maxim that justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
4 Feb 2026

The New Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework – Relevance for Cayman Investment Funds

The Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) Regulations, 2025 (CARF Regulations) came into effect on 1 January 2026 and provide for the collection, reporting and automatic exchange of information on transactions in crypto-assets.  The CARF Regulations will operate in a similar fashion to the existing Cayman Common Reporting Standard (CRS) regime which facilitates the automatic exchange of financial account information.  For information on recent changes to the CRS, please see our December advisory here.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
27 Jan 2026

CIMA Launches Prudential Information Survey for SIBA Registered Persons

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published a General Industry Notice launching a new Prudential Information Survey for Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (SIBA) of the Cayman Islands.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
15 Dec 2025

Aquapoint LP v Fan: Privy Council Confirms Equitable Constraints Can Override Strict Contractual Rights in Cayman ELP Winding Up

In its recent judgment in Aquapoint LP (in Official Liquidation) v Fan,[1] the Privy Council upheld the judgments of the Grand Court and Cayman Islands Court of Appeal (CICA). The ruling confirms that the exercise of strict legal rights under a limited partnership agreement – even one containing detailed contractual terms and “entire agreement” clauses – can nevertheless be subject to equitable considerations in certain circumstances. Where those equitable considerations arise, they may justify the winding up of an exempted limited partnership on the “just and equitable” basis. Appleby acts for the joint official liquidators of Aquapoint; for further details on the background of this case, see Appleby’s previous article here.