Captive Insurance Companies in the Cayman Islands

Published: 29 Aug 2024
Type: Insight

In this publication, Appleby Insurance experts provide a breakdown on the benefits of captive insurance companies and discuss why the Cayman Islands is a popular jurisdiction for such entities.

 


1. What is a captive insurance company?

A captive insurance company (Captive) is typically a wholly owned subsidiary insurer, which is established to insure the risks of its parent company or related entities. It is a form of self-insurance.

Captives are used by corporate groups in many different industries, including manufacturing, healthcare, energy, technology, food and beverage, aviation, financial services, fintech and retail. Captives are also used by non-profit organisations.

2. What are the advantages of a Captive?

There are a number of reasons why a corporate group may choose to set up its own Captive, including to:

  • secure insurance coverage for difficult to insure risks
  • reduce its insurance costs
  • ensure more efficient claims handling
  • increase its control over the underwriting process
  • determine the investment strategy of the Captive

3. Why do Captives choose the Cayman Islands?

The Cayman Islands benefits from a respected and well-established regulator in the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA), who are responsive, approachable and pragmatic.

The Cayman Islands also has an abundance of top tier service providers for Captives (insurance managers, legal advisors, accountants etc.) who are well positioned to service the captive insurance market.

The Cayman Islands is the second largest Captive domicile globally and the most popular domicile in the world for healthcare Captives.

4. What is the tax position for Captives in the Cayman Islands?

The Cayman Islands is tax neutral, with no direct taxation applicable to Captives incorporated in the Cayman Islands (other than stamp duty on documents executed in or brought into the Cayman Islands).

A Cayman Islands Captive can apply for a tax exemption certificate, which is an undertaking from the Financial Secretary of the Cayman Islands, that the Captive will be exempted for a period of up to 30 years from any legislation imposing taxes on profit, capital gains or inheritance if such legislation be introduced in the Cayman Islands.

It is also possible for a Cayman Islands Captive to make a Section 953(d) election for US tax purposes, subject to complying with the applicable US tax provisions.

5. How many Captives are there in the Cayman Islands?

As of 30 June 2024, there were approximately 673 Captives in the Cayman Islands regulated by CIMA, comprising:

(A) 154 segregated portfolio companies (SPC), which is a type of exempted company that may create segregated portfolios (SP), with the assets and liabilities of each SP being legally separate from the assets and liabilities of other SPs and from the general assets and liabilities of the SPC; and

(B) 519 non-SPCs.

6. What is the Insurance Managers Association of Cayman (IMAC)?

IMAC is the insurance industry association in the Cayman Islands which was established in 1994. IMAC represents insurance managers, Captives and service providers in the Captive insurance industry in the Cayman Islands.

IMAC acts as the liaison between CIMA, the Cayman Islands government and the Cayman insurance industry and has been instrumental in promoting the development of the captive insurance industry in the Cayman Islands.

IMAC organises and hosts the annual Cayman Captive Forum, which is the largest captive insurance conference in the world. The next Cayman Captive Forum is, as at the date of writing, scheduled to be held on 3 December 2024 to 5 December 2024 in the Cayman Islands.

7. How is a Captive established in the Cayman Islands?

The process is straightforward and involves:

(A) the formation of a corporate vehicle; and

(B) the licensing of that corporate vehicle with CIMA,

 a brief summary of each is set out below.

(A) Formation of a Corporate Vehicle for a Captive

Exempted companies are the most common corporate vehicles used for Captives in the Cayman Islands. SPCs are often used by Captives given that multiple SPs may be formed under a single SPC. It is also possible for an SPC, for and on behalf of a particular SP to form a portfolio insurance company (PIC), which is a subsidiary exempted company that has separate legal personality and its own separate board of directors from the SPC. PICs do not require their own separate insurance license and instead “piggyback” off the SPC insurance license.

Companies in the Cayman Islands can be incorporated within 24 hours when the incorporation filing is made on a business day on an express basis with the Cayman Islands Registrar of Companies (Registrar of Companies).

Any Cayman Islands company which wishes to use in its name the term “insurance” or another term that suggests insurance business is being conducted by such company, is required to obtain a letter of non-objection from CIMA before the company can be incorporated with the Registrar of Companies.

(B) CIMA Licensing Process for a Captive

Under the Cayman Islands Insurance Act 2010 (as revised) (Insurance Act), the Class B insurance license framework applies to Captives. There are three sub-categories of Class B insurance license (Class B(i), Class B(ii) and Class B(iii)).

Below is a table summary for each sub-category of Class B insurance license of the CIMA:

(i) minimum capital requirements (MCR), which are the minimum capital that a Class B licensed Captive is required to maintain in order to operate; and

(ii) prescribed capital requirements (PCR), which are the total risk-based capital that a Class B licensed Captive is required to maintain in order to operate.

Class B License CategoryMCRPCR
Class B(i)General: US$100,000

Long-term: US$200,000

Composite: US$300,000

General: PCR = MCR

Long-term: PCR = MCR

Composite: PCR = MCR

Class B(ii)General: US$150,000

Long-term: US$300,000

Composite: US$450,000

General:

10% of Net Earned Premium (“NEP”) to first US$5,000,000
5% of additional NEP up to US$20,000,000
2.5% of additional NEP in excess of US$20,000,000

Long term: PCR = MCR

Composite: amount required to support the general business plus MCR

Class B(iii)General: US$200,000

Long-term: US$400,000

Composite: US$600,000

General:

15% of NEP to first US$5,000,000
7.5% of additional NEP up to US$20,000,000
5% of additional NEP in excess of US$20,000,000

Long-term: PCR = MCR

Composite: amount required to support the general business plus MCR

 

CIMA has a discretion to mandate regulatory capital requirements in addition to those set out in the table above, depending on the business plan submitted for the relevant Captive

The standard requirements for a Class B insurance license application are prescribed by the Insurance Act and include the following information:

a) Name of applicant

 b) A detailed business plan

 c) Three years’ financial projections

 d) Personal details and references for proposed directors and shareholders

              i. A completed personal questionnaire should be provided in respect of all proposed Directors, Officers and Managers.

ii. A “police clearance certificate” is also required, but CIMA will accept a sworn Affidavit an acceptable “other certificate.”

e) Last two years’ audited statements and/or notarised net worth statement of ultimate beneficial owners

 f) Confirmation of appointment from a licensed insurance manager and approved auditor

8. How long does the CIMA licensing process take?

Typically around 8 weeks from the date of receipt of CIMA of a fully completed application form.

9. How can Appleby help?

Our insurance team in the Cayman Islands is comprised of market leading experts in the insurance sector. We have substantial experience in advising Captives on structuring, initial formation, the CIMA licensing process, ongoing regulatory requirements and commercial transactions. Please get in touch if you would like to discuss further.

Share
More publications
Website-Code-Cayman-2
5 Feb 2026

Recusal For Apparent Bias Is Not A New Frontier

In Re New Frontier Health Corporation,[1] Justice Doyle decided to recuse himself, such that he would not hear the trial listed to commence weeks later, on the basis that he made findings in his recent Re 51job Inc judgment, as to the reliability and credibility of the same two experts who would give evidence at the New Frontier trial. The New Frontier judgment represents a further endorsement by the Cayman courts of the fundamental maxim that justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
4 Feb 2026

The New Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework – Relevance for Cayman Investment Funds

The Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) Regulations, 2025 (CARF Regulations) came into effect on 1 January 2026 and provide for the collection, reporting and automatic exchange of information on transactions in crypto-assets.  The CARF Regulations will operate in a similar fashion to the existing Cayman Common Reporting Standard (CRS) regime which facilitates the automatic exchange of financial account information.  For information on recent changes to the CRS, please see our December advisory here.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
27 Jan 2026

CIMA Launches Prudential Information Survey for SIBA Registered Persons

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published a General Industry Notice launching a new Prudential Information Survey for Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (SIBA) of the Cayman Islands.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
15 Dec 2025

Aquapoint LP v Fan: Privy Council Confirms Equitable Constraints Can Override Strict Contractual Rights in Cayman ELP Winding Up

In its recent judgment in Aquapoint LP (in Official Liquidation) v Fan,[1] the Privy Council upheld the judgments of the Grand Court and Cayman Islands Court of Appeal (CICA). The ruling confirms that the exercise of strict legal rights under a limited partnership agreement – even one containing detailed contractual terms and “entire agreement” clauses – can nevertheless be subject to equitable considerations in certain circumstances. Where those equitable considerations arise, they may justify the winding up of an exempted limited partnership on the “just and equitable” basis. Appleby acts for the joint official liquidators of Aquapoint; for further details on the background of this case, see Appleby’s previous article here.