Merger & Acquisition (M&A) Dispute Resolution

Merger disputes can often arise between parties owing to the complex nature of transactions involved in selling, purchasing and combining two or more companies. As one of the leading offshore law firms that specialises in both mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and dispute resolution, Appleby is able to offer unparalleled legal advice in the area of merger disputes.

Offshore merger disputes

We understand that buying or selling a business is never a straightforward process. Whether a pre-closing or post-closing dispute, our team of merger disputes lawyers are able to leverage our firm’s deep understanding of commercial issues in M&A transactions, including in particular the valuation of shares, along with relevant statutes and legal precedents.

From due diligence to dispute resolution, we possess the necessary legal expertise to ably navigate shareholder rights and contractual obligations including breach of warranty, indemnity and price adjustment issues. Trust in our technical acumen to deliver comprehensive legal support throughout your M&A journey and to safeguard your interests with precision and integrity.

Our Experts
  • All
  • Guernsey (2)
  • Cayman Islands (1)
  • Jersey (1)
  • Hong Kong (2)
  • Bermuda (1)
SPOTLIGHT

Cayman merger disputes Lawyers

Our Merger Disputes lawyers in the Cayman Islands regularly advise dissenting shareholders who are dissatisfied with offer-merger consideration in proceedings to resolve the fair value of shares.

The team, which also has experts based in Hong Kong, is regarded as a market leader in respect to both appraisal rights claims and advising on fiduciary duty considerations. This is evidenced by rankings and commentary in highly respected legal directories such as Chambers and Partners, and The Legal 500, with recent praise of our Cayman dispute resolution team highlighting how “they are very alive to commercial issues and pressures, and they are mindful of this when discussing their strategy” (Chambers).

More news
The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
7 Apr 2026

No Claim, No Injunction: What Does a Limited Partner Actually Own?

What equitable proprietary interest, if any, does a limited partner hold in the assets of a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership, and is that interest is sufficient to ground a proprietary injunction? These questions lie at the heart of Parker J’s recent judgment in the matter of Charitable DAF HoldCo, Ltd (in Official Liquidation), in which the Grand Court refused proprietary injunctive relief sought by joint official liquidators against former directors and associated entities. The judgment holds that the Company, as a limited partner in a Cayman ELP, had no equitable proprietary interest in the Fund’s underlying assets of the quality required to found the relief sought. While the court did not exclude the possibility of an LP having proprietary rights in an ELP’s assets, it held that on the particular facts of the case such rights were excluded.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Website-Code-Guernsey-1
23 Mar 2026

Guernsey introduces seven-year deferral for taxation of share-based awards

A closer look at the remedies available to protect assets in Guernsey, specifically around how a freezing order can be obtained, the protections involved and the types of assets that can can be frozen.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Mar 2026

Privacy at Work: What PIPA Means for Bermuda Employers

The Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (PIPA), which came into force on 1 January 2025, represents Bermuda’s first comprehensive date protection regime. The legislation regulates the collection, use, disclosure and storage of personal information with the objective of protecting individuals’ privacy while allowing organisations to use data in a responsible and transparent manner. PIPA applies broadly to organisations operating in Bermuda, including employers. As a result, the employment relationship is one of the contexts in which the practical impact of PIPA is the most significant. Employers routinely process large volumes of personal information relating to employees and job applicants, and PIPA imposes obligations that affect recruitment, workplace monitoring, record-keeping, and disciplinary processes.

Dispute Resolution
4 Mar 2026

Bermuda: An Overview of Insurance: Contentious

There has been a recent increase in policyholder disputes involving coverage challenges by (re)insurers in the context of Bermuda high-value, excess-of-loss policies. This is, in part, due to Bermuda’s commercial (re)insurers facing a marked and sustained rise in the volume of claims, incurring claims costs globally of BMD1.1 trillion from 2016 through 2024. The massive volume and quantum of claims can be attributed in part to the significance of the Bermuda (re)insurance market in the global economy, as well as Bermuda’s exposure to catastrophic losses caused by natural disasters over this period. Bermuda’s increased exposure to global (re)insurance risks has naturally resulted in an increase in complex claims and coverage disputes.