Snapshot of Recent Updates to the Virtual Assets Regime in the Cayman Islands

Published: 14 Mar 2025
Type: Insight

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) – the regulatory authority for virtual assets – has recently published new legislation and guidance enhancing the virtual assets regulatory regime in the Cayman Islands. In this snapshot, we summarise the key changes.


Implementation of the ‘Phase 2’ licensing regime

The Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act, 2020 (Commencement) Order, 2025 enacts the long-awaited Phase 2 licensing regime, which commenced on 1 April 2025.

Phase 2 implements a licensing regime for virtual asset trading platforms and virtual asset custodians, as set out in the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act (Revised) (VASPA).  All entities  carrying on the provision of virtual asset custody services or the operation of a virtual asset trading platform in or from within the Cayman Islands will require a licence from CIMA.

Any current CIMA registered person (e.g. a current virtual assets service provider (VASP)) who at 1 April 2025 was providing virtual asset custody services and/or operating a virtual asset trading platform must apply to CIMA for a virtual assets service licence within 90 days (i.e. by the end of June 2025). Existing registrations will be cancelled if a licence is granted.

Any new applicants with in-progress applications to CIMA whose application relates to services requiring a licence will be contacted by CIMA to provide additional application paperwork and make payment of the full licence application fee (minus any initial application fee already paid).

Importantly, the licensing regime is not a new requirement. The Phase 2 licensing provisions were included in previous iterations of the VASPA but without a commencement date while the first phase of the virtual assets regime was implemented in 2020 and refined.

Other changes under the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment) Act, 2024 (the “VASP (Amendment) Act”)

The VASP Amendment Act has introduced a number of clarifications and new or enhanced requirements to bolster CIMA’s oversight and consumer protection in the sector.  Such changes also came into effect on 1 April 2025 and apply to all VASPs.  The key amendments include:

  • definitions – clearer definitions, including new definitions for ‘convertible virtual asset’, ‘originator’ and ‘owner’, and the removal of redundant terms;
  • audited accounts – in addition to the existing requirement to prepare annual accounts, CIMA has discretion to require a VASP to provide audited financial statements if CIMA determines it necessary due to the nature, size or complexity of the business or where it has reasonable grounds for believing that the VASP has provided false or misleading accounts;
  • directors – a minimum requirement for VASPs to appoint at least three ‘fit and proper’ directors, one of whom must be an independent director with no vested interest in the company;
  • accuracy of disclosures – VASPs must ensure the accuracy of all disclosures, advertising materials and communications relating to its virtual asset services with clients and members of the public. Knowingly making, issuing or permitting any misleading representation to the public about the VASP’s activities in any way will amount to an offence;
  • business plan changes – a VASP must seek the prior written approval of CIMA to (i) make a change to its approved business plan that modifies the provision of the virtual asset service for which its licence or registration was granted or (ii) provide additional virtual asset services not included in its approved application or business plan;
  • notifications to CIMA – CIMA has expanded the list of circumstances which must be notified to it to include commencement of any litigation proceedings against the VASP, and introduced a 30-day deadline in respect of all notifications to be made to CIMA under section 9(4)(c) of VASPA;
  • custody disclosures – CIMA can require custodians to make more extensive disclosures to clients, including concerning the transparency of operations, internal safeguards, methods of access to virtual assets held, insurance, its regulatory obligations, grievance procedures, sharing of clients’ information with third parties and its internal custodial governance arrangements;
  • custody and safeguarding – CIMA can also impose additional requirements on custodians relating to its safe custody of client assets, including relating to adequate safeguards against theft and loss, segregation of proprietary and client assets, and detailed record-keeping;
  • fiat holdings – CIMA can require custodians to hold fiat currency in a bank regulated by CIMA or another regulator in a non high-risk jurisdiction, to be kept segregated from any fiat currency owned by the custodian; and
  • regulator powers – CIMA has expanded oversight and enforcement powers against VASPs, including enhanced information and inspection powers as well as powers to revoke licences or waivers, impose conditions, and cancel registrations.

The new Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 (the “Regulations”)

The Regulations revise the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Regulations, 2020 and came into force immediately following the VASP Amendment Act (i.e. on 1 April 2025). The Regulations primarily deal with the form of application documentation for registration or licence under the VASPA and the applicable fees.

The Regulations introduce a new Schedule 1A listing information to be provided to CIMA together with a completed application form.  All applicants must complete the general information in Part A.  Applicants who intend to provide virtual asset custodian services must complete Part B and applicants who intend to operate a virtual asset trading platform must complete Part C – these are new sections requiring more extensive documentation than under the 2020 Regulations.

As noted above, we understand that applicants with in-progress applications will be contacted by CIMA to provide additional application paperwork (being all documents required under the new Regulations not already submitted as part of the applicant’s initial application).

As previously, for all applications, two senior officers of the applicant must sign the declaration confirming that (i) they have read and understand the VASPA and the Regulations as well as the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations 2025 and (ii) all information contained in the application is accurate in all material aspects to the best of their knowledge and belief.  Applicants should ensure they are well-briefed ahead of making such declaration.

Schedule 2 sets out the revised fees for registration and licensing under the VASPA, as set out below. This includes new fees in respect of virtual asset services licences under the Phase 2 licensing regime:

  • a non-refundable application fee payable at the time of submitting an application;
  • a registration fee (varying depending on the type and scale of virtual asset services to be provided by registered persons, including the issuance of virtual assets);
  • a licensing fee for the provision of virtual asset custody services only;
  • a licensing fee for the operation of a virtual asset trading platform; and
  • annual renewal fees (varying depending on the revenue projected or generated in the prior year from the provision of the relevant virtual asset services).

Reduced fees calculated at 10% of the standard fees apply if the applicant, registered person or licensee is a local company as defined under the Local Companies (Control) Act (2025 Revision) offering services in the Cayman Islands.

Expansion of CIMA fees

The Monetary Authority (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2024 came into force on 1 January 2025.  The Act extends certain CIMA administrative fees to include all licensees and registered persons (i.e. including all registered and licensed VASPs).

Schedule 2 to the Act sets out the fees applicable to relevant activities, which include applications for a change of business plan, a certified copy of a licence, a change of company name and various other circumstances.

Our virtual assets practice

Our Band 1-ranked FinTech team in the Cayman Islands regularly advises businesses on the regulatory scope of the virtual assets regime and potential exemptions, steering clients through the CIMA application process and their ongoing regulatory obligations.  We work with first-time founders through to some of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, together with our global team of technology and digital assets experts in all major offshore centres.  Our work spans initial structuring, company set-up, establishing by-laws and governance structures, regulatory applications, token launches and other fundraising and investments, services agreements, software development and IP licensing arrangements, through to partnerships, acquisitions and exits (including SPACs/deSPACs and IPOs).  We also work with crypto-focused investment funds and other investors on their digital assets investments.

Share
More publications
JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
24 Jul 2026

Thalassa Investments LP: Section 22 and Specific Discovery - Strategic Considerations for Limited Partners Seeking Information and Documents

In Thalassa Investments LP [2026] CIGC (FSD) 32, the Grand Court refused an application by limited partner petitioners for specific discovery from the general partner in just and equitable proceedings to wind up a Cayman Islands ELP. The ruling was against the backdrop of serious lack of probity allegations made against the general partner by the petitioners. Notwithstanding those allegations, the Grand Court declined to make orders requiring discovery of various categories of documents to be used at trial.   The ruling brings into focus the multiple routes potentially open to limited partners seeking information and/or documents from an ELP where there are allegations of mismanagement by the general partner. The limited partner may issue substantive proceedings (or, as in this case, present a just and equitable winding up petition) against the general partner and partnership, and then obtain documents through the usual discovery process. Alternatively, the limited partner may pursue its substantive right to true and full information under section 22 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act first in order to help inform the bringing of a substantive claim, as was the approach in the Neoma (Abraaj) and the Port Fund litigation. Thalassa illustrates that the nature of the information sought, who holds it, and the legal basis on which disclosure is sought are all highly relevant to the outcome. The decision also highlights that section 22 and discovery serve different purposes, are governed by different legal tests and can produce different outcomes. The strategic question is not whether section 22 or the discovery process may be preferable in the abstract, but which legal framework best aligns with the limited partner’s objectives and the nature of the information sought.

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance
13 Jul 2026

Guide to Loans & Secured Financing in the Cayman Islands 2026

This guide provides local insights into the legal and regulatory framework governing bank lending and finance. It covers key topics including bank loans versus debt securities, common forms of bank loan facilities, bridge financing, the roles of agents, trustees and lenders, and governing laws. It also examines the regulatory landscape, including capital, liquidity and disclosure requirements, the use of loan proceeds, cross-border lending, and interest rate and currency restrictions. In addition, the guide explores security interests and guarantees, the impact of fraudulent conveyance and similar doctrines on bank loan financing structures, intercreditor arrangements, loan terms and structures, and recent market developments.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
9 Jul 2026

A Warning to Litigants Seeking Funding: English High Court Clarifies the Limits of Litigation Privilege

Important for Cayman litigants, funders and attorneys given the growing use of third-party funding in disputes.

Appleby-Website-Fraud-and-Asset-Tracing
8 Jul 2026

A Cautionary Tale in Interim Injunctive Relief: Lessons from Dixon v Seymour

In a recent judgment of Chief Justice Ramsay-Hale, the Cayman Grand Court provided guidance on the necessary components of an application for interim injunctive relief. The ruling illustrates how an ex parte application may fail to satisfy the American Cyanamid test when unsupported by proper evidence.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
7 Jul 2026

CIMA’s 2026 Reinsurance Thematic Review: Focus Points for Boards

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published its 2026 Thematic Review of Reinsurance Companies (Thematic Review). This reflects fieldwork conducted by CIMA between mid-2025 and Q1 2026 at selected Class B(iii) and Class D licensed reinsurers. The focus being on compliance with the Insurance Act (as revised) and other applicable legislation, regulations, rules and statements of guidance as issued by CIMA centering around stress-testing, cash flow testing frameworks, capital and collateral adequacy management, and corporate governance. Corporate governance weaknesses account for 68% of all findings with the remaining 32% spread across stress-testing, cash flow testing capital and collateral adequacy. Notwithstanding these findings, CIMA has noted several good practices across all areas including, importantly, comprehensive risk management frameworks covering key risk areas and strong capital and collateral adequacy monitoring processes. With Cayman’s reinsurance sector having grown to an institutional scale, and over 110 licensed reinsurers writing in the order of US$30 billion in annual premiums against over US$100 billion in assets, this latest Thematic Review demonstrates development in CIMA’s supervisory expectations of Cayman’s licensed reinsurers. It represents a reflection of the jurisdiction’s increasingly sophisticated and maturing reinsurance market and reinforces that CIMA’s expectations align closely with the standards that onshore counterparty cedants, rating agencies and US state regulators already expect. We take this opportunity to review certain of the key findings alongside CIMA’s cross-sectoral 2026 Thematic Review on Outsourcing, note some of the good practices highlighted by CIMA and make some associated recommendations for Cayman reinsurers.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
25 Jun 2026

CIMA Enforcement Action in Focus: Reminders and Recommendations

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has recently published a number of Enforcement Notices that provide helpful context for regulated entities, including Licensees and Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA), seeking to understand and meet their ongoing regulatory obligations in the Cayman Islands. In early June 2026, CIMA exercised its enforcement powers under SIBA Section 17 to cancel the registrations of several SIBA Registered Persons on the basis that it had reasonable grounds to believe that such Registered Persons had failed to meet certain key regulatory obligations. The Appleby Team takes this opportunity to review the relevant findings and CIMA enforcement action; and to highlight certain key obligations that attach to regulated entities in the Cayman Islands.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
23 Jun 2026

Important Cayman Islands Industry Advisory: Common Reporting Standard 2.0 and Economic Substance Updates

Further to the introduction of the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 (the CRS Amendment Regulations or CRS 2.0), the Cayman Islands Department for International Tax Cooperation (DITC) has issued an Industry Advisory flagging certain key updates in respect of Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and Economic Substance (ES) reporting in the Cayman Islands. Cayman Financial Institutions will be required file 2025 CRS Returns and Declarations by 31 July 2026, ahead of the online DITC Portal’s closure to facilitate its transition to XML Schema v3.0. ES courtesy reminders (which have historically been sent by email to designated Responsible Persons in advance of annual ES reporting deadlines) will no longer be issued such that Relevant Entities will need to independently track such deadlines themselves. Updated Individual and Entity CRS Self-Certification forms, aligned with CRS 2.0, are now available online via the DITC website.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
18 Jun 2026

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [2026] CIGC (FSD) 22, the Grand Court clarified the scope of joint provisional liquidators' powers following their appointment. In particular, the Court confirmed that the appointment of provisional liquidators does not automatically displace existing directors.

Appleby-Website-Cayman2
17 Jun 2026

Property, Fairness and the Constitution: The Grand Court Marks the Boundaries of Freedom of Information

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has overturned a decision of the Ombudsman in a successful judicial review brought by Caribbean Utilities Company, Ltd. (CUC), represented by Appleby.