Significant changes to Cayman Islands Trusts Law

Published: 20 May 2019
Type: Insight

The well-established regime for trusts in the Cayman Islands has been improved by significant changes to the Trusts Law (2018 Revision) (Trusts Law) pursuant to The Trusts (Amendment) Law, 2019 (Amendment), gazetted on 15 May 2019. The Amendment is to come into force at a future date by way of a commencement order.


The Amendment furthers Cayman’s reputation as a world class trusts jurisdiction by enhancing the inherent jurisdiction of a Cayman Islands court in relation to the administration of trusts. The changes, brought about as a result of a report by the Cayman Islands Law Reform Commission on Cayman’s trusts law, have the support of Cayman’s Judiciary and Cayman’s STEP branch.

Existing Regime

The primary trusts legislation in the Cayman Islands is the Trusts Law, supplemented by the Fraudulent Dispositions Law and the Perpetuities Law. However, Cayman Islands trusts law is not fully prescribed by statute; trusts established in the Cayman Islands and subject to domestic law are strongly influenced by judicial decisions of the English courts in trust cases as well as the decisions of Cayman Islands courts.

Key Changes under the Amendment

When the Amendment comes into force, the Trusts Law is amended:

  • to replace the definition of “trust corporation” to mean “a body corporate licensed to conduct trust business, with or without restrictions, under the Banks and Trust Companies Law … or registered under that Law as a controlled subsidiary or a private trust company” (s. 2);
  • to include a new section (a) setting out the circumstances in which the Court has jurisdiction to set aside the mistaken exercise of fiduciary power by a trustee and (b) identifying the persons who may apply to the Court to invoke its jurisdiction in those circumstances (s. 64A);
  • to include a definition of “trust litigation” (meaning “litigation invoking the inherent jurisdiction of the Court in relation to the administration of trusts”) and a new section which, in relation to the exercise of the Court’s jurisdiction to approve compromises of trust litigation affecting minor or unborn beneficiaries, replaces the “for the benefit” test with a “not to the detriment” test (ss 2 and 64B);
  • to replace the “for the benefit test” with a “not to the detriment test” in relation to the Court’s jurisdiction to vary trusts (s. 72(1);
  • to extend the protection afforded by reference to “a personal relationship to the settlor” (in the context of the application of foreign laws which may prohibit or not recognise the concept of a trust) to include a personal relationship to any beneficiary (whether discretionary or otherwise) (s. 91(b); and
  • to empower the Court to make rules in order to give effect to the provisions of the Trusts Law, as amended (s. 111A).

The Amendment will bring further clarification and build on Cayman’s already highly regarded Trusts Law.

Should you have any questions, please contact Carlos de Serpa Pimentel or Esmond Brown.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
15 Dec 2025

Aquapoint LP v Fan: Privy Council Confirms Equitable Constraints Can Override Strict Contractual Rights in Cayman ELP Winding Up

In its recent judgment in Aquapoint LP (in Official Liquidation) v Fan,[1] the Privy Council upheld the judgments of the Grand Court and Cayman Islands Court of Appeal (CICA). The ruling confirms that the exercise of strict legal rights under a limited partnership agreement – even one containing detailed contractual terms and “entire agreement” clauses – can nevertheless be subject to equitable considerations in certain circumstances. Where those equitable considerations arise, they may justify the winding up of an exempted limited partnership on the “just and equitable” basis. Appleby acts for the joint official liquidators of Aquapoint; for further details on the background of this case, see Appleby’s previous article here.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
31 Oct 2025

Cayman Islands Court Considers Scope Of Powers To Be Sought In Letter Of Request

Cayman Islands liquidators regularly seek recognition of their appointment in Hong Kong, and rely on letters of request from the Grand Court in support of such recognition applications. In its short decision in Re China GEM Fund IX L.P. [2025] CIGC (FSD) 100 the Grand Court has provided guidance on the appropriate scope of powers to be sought in such requests.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
28 Oct 2025

Updates on Hong Kong’s Uncertificated Securities Market Regime from an offshore perspective

Hong Kong’s uncertificated securities market ("USM”) initiative is scheduled to take effect in 2026, subject to market readiness.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
21 Oct 2025

Redemption of Cayman shares in Chinese Red Chip corporate groups – latest developments and ideas for investors

This article provides an overview of the key legal issues facing preference shareholders in Cayman Islands companies when considering enforcing their redemption rights.

Appleby-Website-Structured-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
26 Sep 2025

Structured lending for hyperscale data center providers: offshore spvs powering securitisation driven capital solutions

The exponential growth of hyperscale data centers, driven by surging demand for cloud computing, artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure, is reshaping the way these assets are financed. As operators seek to scale rapidly, bank debt funding is moving towards capital markets solutions. Securitisation, particularly in Asia, is emerging as a strategic tool to monetise long-term lease receivables, with offshore SPVs playing a pivotal role in enabling cross-border capital flows.