Cayman Islands enhances its Statement of Guidance on the Nature, Accessibility and Retention of Records

Published: 27 Sep 2017
Type: Insight

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published an updated Statement of Guidance on the Nature, Accessibility and Retention of Records (the Guidance).


Its objective is to ensure that persons and entities regulated or registered under Cayman Islands regulatory laws, including company directors registered or licensed under the Directors Registration and Licensing Law, maintain records in a manner that promotes accessibility, clarity and the reduction of risk.

Previous guidance was first issued by CIMA in October 2003 and the new Guidance is based on research conducted by CIMA, feedback received from industry participants and a review of laws/measures issued in various jurisdictions. It is not intended to be prescriptive or exhaustive but rather it sets out CIMA’s “minimum expectations” of a relevant entity’s record keeping arrangements.

The Guidance will be of obvious benefit and reassurance to international clients of the Cayman Islands given the recent havoc wrought by storms elsewhere in the Caribbean. Clarity and certainty of robust information systems, data retention, controls and back up, further strengthen the Cayman Islands position as a leading international financial centre. In addition, the Guidance will help the Cayman Islands further demonstrate its commitment to ensuring proper maintenance of records, noting that discussions surrounding beneficial ownership information have been a high priority to international organisations such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the Financial Action Task Force.

Highlights include:

  • Relevant entities should maintain records in their original format for at least five years after a transaction date, with “original format” including electronic copies of paper-based records. This pre-existing requirement is the minimum time period for which records must be kept. For example, where a fiduciary relationship has been formed with clients it may be necessary to keep records for longer periods of time. In the case of trusts for example, the requirement to keep records may last for the life-time of the trust or for further periods thereafter.
  • Electronic records must be easily accessible and CIMA expects that most records should be provided within one to three business days from the time that they are requested by CIMA, whether stored within the Cayman Islands or in another jurisdiction.
  • CIMA requires that a relevant entity record information likely to be required by CIMA in such a way as to enable a particular transaction to be identified at any time and traced through the accounting systems of the relevant entity, in particular in such manner as to enable early identification of balances and of the particular items which make up those balances.

Examples of records which CIMA expects a relevant entity to keep include:

  • (detailed) corporate accounting records
  • organisational records
  • employee and other administrative records
  • risk management policies
  • corporate records such as incorporation documents, shareholders’ and directors’ meeting minutes and board resolutions
  • client records such as client communication and complaints records
  • service provider records such as copies of contracts and agreements
  • customer due diligence records
  • annual returns filed with CIMA

CIMA requires that the record-keeping be sufficient to enable it to monitor compliance with regulatory and anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing obligations. Relevant entities must also maintain adequate procedures for the availability, maintenance, security, privacy and preservation of records belonging to the relevant entity, clients or others so that they are reasonably safeguarded against loss, unauthorised access, alteration or destruction. This includes records retained electronically or by any other medium.

Where records are maintained outside the Cayman Islands through outsourcing, storage, or other arrangements, the relevant entity remains ultimately responsible for record keeping requirements and accessibility to records by CIMA.

Appleby’s regulatory team in the Cayman Islands specialises in complex financial services regulatory work for banks, insurers, trust companies, mutual fund administrators, company managers, corporate services providers, insurance managers and other financial services institutions regulated in the Cayman Islands. The dedicated team provides advice to local and international businesses on the management of the legal, commercial and reputational risks often associated with regulatory and legislative issues. Our regulatory specialists cover the full range of financial services matters. We also routinely advise regulated financial institutions on the regulatory implications and reporting requirements in relation to mergers, acquisitions and reorganisations, as well as interpretation and application of statements of principle and guidance issued by CIMA. Our unique blend of experience and unique insight ensures that the advice we provide is highly commercial and practical encompassing the full range of offshore regulatory issues and problems that arise for our financial service providers, regulators and governments

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
19 Mar 2026

Key Regulatory Requirements of SIBA Registered Persons in the Cayman Islands

Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA) attract regulatory requirements including annual reporting requirements with key filing deadlines falling in January and, typically, December each year. The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA)’s recently issued General Industry Notice to the effect that all SIBA Registered Persons will be additionally required to submit a Prudential Information Survey for the 2025 calendar year (by 31 March 2026) has signaled CIMA's continued focus on enhancing the resilience, transparency and prudential soundness of the securities investment business (SIB) sector in the Cayman Islands. Accordingly, this briefing reviews some of the other key regulatory and reporting obligations that attach to Registered Persons under SIBA, CIMA’s associated Rules and Statements of Guidance (SOG), the applicable Anti-Money Laundering Regulations (Cayman AML Regulations) the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) Regulations (Revised) (Cayman CRS Regulations) and, where applicable, The International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Act (Revised) (ES Act).

IWD website preview
9 Mar 2026

International Women’s Day 2026 Roundtable: Rights. Justice. Action. For all women and girls.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
3 Mar 2026

Cayman Islands Regulatory Round Up - Winter 2025/26

The round-up provides a concise yet thorough summary of regulatory developments relevant to financial service providers (FSPs) and other stakeholders in the Cayman Islands. It highlights key legislative changes, publications by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA), updates on financial sanctions, and anticipates upcoming changes through "horizon scanning”. Links to the underlying CIMA publications, as well as related Appleby published briefings and e-alerts are available throughout this document. The information provided is “as of” 28 May 2025.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
16 Feb 2026

Preparing for and Managing a CIMA Onsite Inspection

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) is empowered, under the Monetary Authority Act and certain other regulatory laws, to inspect regulated financial service providers (FSP) in the Cayman Islands such as banks, trust companies, administrators, investment managers and virtual asset service providers for compliance with applicable regulatory frameworks. CIMA routinely conducts onsite inspections of such regulated entities – which can be full-scope (involving a review of all areas of a regulated entity's business operations) or thematically focused on specific areas such as corporate governance and/or internal controls, policies and procedures pertaining to AML/CFT/CPF. With the breadth and number of onsite inspections carried out by CIMA having increased through 2024 and 2025 we consider, in this briefing: (i) the CIMA onsite inspection process; (ii) the latest feedback available from CIMA in respect of inspections conducted to date; and (iii) some frequently asked questions in relation to CIMA onsite inspections.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
16 Feb 2026

Injunctive Relief in Another Form? Cayman Court's Jurisdiction to Appoint JPLs Despite Ongoing Arbitration

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [link],[1] the Grand Court confirmed that it has jurisdiction to appoint provisional liquidators notwithstanding the fact that the company’s shareholders are engaged in an arbitration over its affairs, as mandated by a binding arbitration agreement. This article considers the decision and its implications.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
11 Feb 2026

When the Court intervenes… and when it does not: Grand Court Reaffirms Limited Curial Intervention in Support of Foreign Arbitrations

The Financial Services Division of the Grand Court’s judgment in In the matter of A v B & C (FSD 270 of 2025) provides a timely reminder of the proper boundaries between national courts and international arbitration tribunals in respect of the grant of interim relief. The decision underscores the Cayman Islands' commitment to the principle of limited curial intervention and confirms that the Court’s powers under section 54 of the Arbitration Act 2012 are ancillary to the arbitral process and are only to be exercised when the tribunal cannot provide effective relief itself. The judgment helpfully sets out clear parameters for those seeking ancillary relief and highlights that the Cayman courts will support arbitration proceedings without supplanting them.

Website-Code-Cayman-2
5 Feb 2026

Recusal For Apparent Bias Is Not A New Frontier

In Re New Frontier Health Corporation,[1] Justice Doyle decided to recuse himself, such that he would not hear the trial listed to commence weeks later, on the basis that he made findings in his recent Re 51job Inc judgment, as to the reliability and credibility of the same two experts who would give evidence at the New Frontier trial. The New Frontier judgment represents a further endorsement by the Cayman courts of the fundamental maxim that justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
4 Feb 2026

The New Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework – Relevance for Cayman Investment Funds

The Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) Regulations, 2025 (CARF Regulations) came into effect on 1 January 2026 and provide for the collection, reporting and automatic exchange of information on transactions in crypto-assets.  The CARF Regulations will operate in a similar fashion to the existing Cayman Common Reporting Standard (CRS) regime which facilitates the automatic exchange of financial account information.  For information on recent changes to the CRS, please see our December advisory here.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
27 Jan 2026

CIMA Launches Prudential Information Survey for SIBA Registered Persons

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published a General Industry Notice launching a new Prudential Information Survey for Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (SIBA) of the Cayman Islands.