Gatekeepers in Focus: From CARA to LSSA - Cayman’s New AML Supervisor for Lawyers

Published: 27 May 2026

Anti-money laundering, countering the financing of terrorism, and counter-proliferation financing (AML) expectations and requirements for professional advisers continue to develop globally, and the Cayman Islands has established a new dedicated AML Supervisory Authority for its legal services sector — the Legal Services Supervisory Authority (LSSA).

Responsibility for AML supervision of attorneys-at-law now rests with the Cayman Islands Legal Services Council, which has delegated operational supervision to the LSSA.

AML obligations for lawyers in Cayman are not new. Legal professionals were previously supervised through the Cayman Attorneys Regulatory Authority (CARA). The LSSA, however, represents a more specialised, risk-focused model tailored to legal practice. For trust and estate practitioners, this signals a shift in how AML risk in legal services will be assessed and overseen.


Why the change?

International standards, particularly the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), recognise the key role legal professionals play in structuring and facilitating the movement of wealth. Trust formation, estate planning, corporate structuring and cross-border asset transfers all intersect with potential money laundering risk. Cayman is scheduled to begin its next Caribbean FATF (CFATF) mutual evaluation in 2027.

While CARA oversaw a robust AML regime for legal services in Cayman, the LSSA has been created to ensure consistent oversight across the legal sector whilst recognising its distinctive features including — confidentiality, fiduciary duties, a client’s right to legal advice and lawyers’ involvement in complex private structures.

What does the LSSA supervise?

Lawyers conducting or assisting other persons in the planning or execution of relevant financial business, as defined in Schedule 6 of the Proceeds of Crime Act in or from within the Cayman Islands, must now register with the LSSA.

The scope of the applicable AML regime is activity-based and includes legal services involving:

  • establishment and administration of trusts and fiduciary structures
  • incorporations and formation of legal entities
  • cross-border estate and succession planning
  • handling client funds
  • structuring corporate or investment vehicles

Applicable AML obligations in a given instance will therefore depend on the work performed, not simply professional status.

What are the considerations for STEP members?

For STEP members, AML supervision of legal practice in Cayman is expected to reflect a more tailored and risk-focused approach to the types of work common in trust and estate practices — particularly high-net-worth families and/or cross-border assets and layered structures.

This in turn raises expectations around how money-laundering and terrorist / proliferation financing risks should be identified, assessed, managed and documented, not only at onboarding but in also terms of ongoing monitoring throughout the client relationship.

What does it mean in practice?

Law firms and sole practitioners must register with the LSSA; a failure to register may lead to administrative fines.

The other practical impacts are however expected to be less about new rules and more about evidencing AML compliance – with key duties of the LSSA being to maintain a register of all law firms and sole practitioners, monitor such law firms and sole practitioners by adopting a risk-based approach to supervision, and taking necessary measures (including, where needed, enforcement measures) to ensure AML compliance. In this respect:

  •  Client due diligence will continue to require a clear understanding of clients, beneficial owners and sources of wealth. In trust matters, this will include the rationale for the trust and expected funding patterns.
  • Risk assessments will still need to be matter-specific. Establishing a multi-jurisdictional trust funded through corporate vehicles will require a documented justification of risk ratings and monitoring steps.
  • Ongoing monitoring will remain essential, with changes in assets, beneficiaries or jurisdictions prompting reassessment (and documentation of the same).
  •  Training and governance may well be inspected and scrutinised, including AML policies, procedures and related staff training materials. Smaller firms will be expected to maintain proportionate but effective controls.

A practical scenario

A STEP member restructuring a trust for a family office with assets in several jurisdictions, for example, would need to reassess the relevant structure’s purpose, understand all relevant asset flows and document how and why the revised arrangement aligns with the relevant client’s known profile – The emphasis being on the adoption and implementation of a genuinely risk-based approach rather than the mechanical completion of a checklist exercise.

What can STEP members take away?

The establishment of the LSSA reflects and reinforces a broader international trend: legal advisers involved in private wealth are seen as key gatekeepers in the AML system. For practitioners, the required responses will be practical:

  • embed documented risk assessment into everyday workflow
  • ensure CDD is supported by a clear understanding of source of wealth and/or source of funds for a specific transaction
  • maintain up-to-date AML policies and procedures and deliver regular AML training for staff
  • treat AML compliance as an ongoing process rather than an onboarding event

Ultimately, the establishment of the LSSA does not change the core role of trust and estate advisers in respect of AML. It does, however, underline that robust AML governance is an integral part of professional legal practice — and a visible one.

Read the Step Journal article here.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Funds-and-Investment-Services
27 Aug 2026

Late-stage liquidity and the Bermuda fund toolkit

Private-market liquidity once followed an exit. Today, however, it must often be engineered. That matters in Bermuda, where asset management is not only a substantial sector in its own right, but also complemented by Bermuda’s re/insurance and insurance-linked securities market.

Website-Code-BVI-1
26 Aug 2026

BVI Court Prevents BVI Company from Redomiciling to Preserve Enforcement Against its Shares

In our article published on 14 November 2025 we addressed an interesting case in which the Court appointed a liquidator to a foreign dissolved company, titled “BVI Court Appoints Liquidators to Foreign Dissolved Company”.  That article referenced a further, related, 2-day hearing that was heard and ultimately determined earlier in the year (on 6 May 2025) in which the Claimants sought to prevent a BVI company from re-domiciling itself to Palestine (the Re-domiciliation Application). This article summarises the key aspects of those Applications.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
26 Aug 2026

Comparative Analysis of Cayman and BVI Companies as Listing Vehicles

This article provides an in-depth company-law comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of Cayman Islands and BVI companies as listing vehicles, with a view to assisting businesses in selecting the appropriate jurisdiction of incorporation for their listing vehicle.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
17 Aug 2026

The Seychelles Financial Services Authority IBC Restrictions Reminder: Circular No. 5 of 2026 and What It Signals for Seychelles IBCs

Supervisory bodies rarely issue formal reminders purely for housekeeping. When the Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA) steps in to remind International Business Companies (IBC) of prohibitions that have sat in the statute books since 2016, it reflects a straightforward reality: surveillance and market monitoring have exposed widespread non-compliance on the ground.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
13 Aug 2026

Restructurings Frustrating Creditors And The Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards: The English High Court's Decision In State Oil Company Of Azerbaijan v Mansimov

The English High Court has issued a significant judgment on the enforcement of arbitral awards, the reach of section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the limits of the Marex tort, with potential relevance to the Cayman Islands' Fraudulent Dispositions Act.

Corporate
13 Aug 2026

The limited liability company: ten years on

Nearly a decade after they were first introduced in Bermuda, parties have started to appreciate the benefits offered by limited liability companies — and consequently we have begun to see LLCs used with increasing frequency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
11 Aug 2026

MGAs, capacity and control

Max Tetlow and Cathryn Minors of Appleby examine the forces pushing MGAs toward better alignment and more disciplined capital.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
7 Aug 2026

New CIMA Rules on AML/CFT/CPF Compliance and Financial Sanctions Issued in the Cayman Islands

On 20 July 2026, further to an industry consultation, the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) published the following two new Rules set to introduce binding risk management, governance, sanctions screening and other compliance requirements for regulated financial service providers in the Cayman Islands: (i) Rule on Effective Compliance Programmes for the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing for Financial Services Providers (AML Rule); and (ii) Rule on Compliance with Financial Sanctions and Targeted Financial Sanctions (Sanctions Rule and, together with the AML Rule, the Rules). All CIMA-regulated financial services providers, including investment funds, insurers and reinsurers that are conducting ‘relevant financial business’ as defined under the Proceeds of Crime Act (Revised) (POCA) (FSP), are encouraged to review and update their documented framework of AML/CFT/CPF and sanctions compliance policies, procedures, controls, oversight and reporting mechanisms (Compliance Programmes) to ensure compliance with the Rules by the time they come into force on 18 September 2026.

Website-Code-BVI-2
6 Aug 2026

The Rights of Sanctioned Litigants to access to the Court: Court of Appeal issues Key Decision in the BVI

The Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal has delivered a significant judgment in AO Alfa-Bank v Kipford Ventures Limited, overturning a stay of proceedings and reinstating a US$142 million freezing injunction. The decision provides important guidance on access to justice, sanctions, and interim relief in the BVI.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
5 Aug 2026

Good faith in action, not just belief: the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa and its significance in the Cayman Islands

May a company director depart from a strategy his board has agreed, in the sincere belief that he knows a better route to the company’s success? In Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa [2026] UKSC 21, the Supreme Court held that, whatever the answer, a director cannot pursue his own strategy by concealing it from, and misleading, his fellow directors. The Court confirmed that the good faith duty is not confined to a director’s sincerely held view of the company’s best interests; it also governs the means by which the director acts. The decision is an authoritative statement of the content of the fiduciary duty of loyalty, and is likely to be influential in the Cayman Islands. The decision will interest directors, those who advise or appoint them, and stakeholders affected by directors’ conduct.