Why Cayman Captiv(e)ates

Published: 23 Jan 2024
Type: Insight

Appleby captive experts Jacob MacAdam and Menelik Miller discuss what makes Cayman such a ‘captive-ating’ jurisdiction and how Appleby can help clients establish and grow their presence in the jurisdiction.


Captive Review (CR): What makes the Cayman Islands a leading jurisdiction for insurance and reinsurance business?

Appleby (A): The Cayman Islands is recognised as one of the world’s largest and most well-regarded international financial centres, home to over 70% of the world’s hedge funds as well as many captive insurance companies. Cayman’s position as a leading jurisdiction is supported by its focus on international clients, with more than 90% of captive insurance business originating from the United States. The Cayman Islands’ decision not to pursue equivalency with Solvency II, a European regulatory directive, as well as its tax neutrality, both provide a level-playing fi eld and lower operational costs for insurers and reinsurers domiciled in Cayman.

CR: How does the Cayman Islands’ location and infrastructure contribute to its attractiveness for insurance and reinsurance companies?

A: The proximity of the Cayman Islands to the United States, combined with its natural beauty and healthy work-life balance, makes it a popular destination for international business relocation. The infrastructure in Grand Cayman offers a conducive environment for insurance business. In addition, the Cayman Islands has a mature financial infrastructure with a plethora of specialised accountants, lawyers and insurance professionals that makes doing business there easy.

CR: What recent developments have been seen in the Cayman’s captive industry?

A: In 2023, the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) continued to issue licences to new captive insurance companies and portfolio insurance companies. This growth indicates the continued strength of the jurisdiction’s insurance industry, with a total of 653 captive insurance companies, including 154 segregated portfolio companies, now licensed in Cayman. The business development pipelines are considered healthy, with expectations of growth and new entrants in the sector.

CR: How is the reinsurance sector performing in the Cayman Islands?

A: The reinsurance sector in the Cayman Islands is thriving. Events like the annual New York breakfast briefing at the Harvard Club and the Cayman Finance Reinsurance Roundtable have highlighted the sector’s robust performance. Despite challenges such as the need for insurers to increase rates to cover the increased cost of reinsurance, the successful registration of reinsurance firms in the Cayman Islands is contributing to the industry’s growth. This growth is mainly in the life and annuity fields. The confidence in the jurisdiction continues to grow with the presence of such entities as Northern Re, Talcott Re and RBC Re being established.

CR: What role does the government play in the growth of the Cayman Islands’ insurance industry?

A: The government of the Cayman Islands, the financial services regulator (CIMA) and industry bodies all play a crucial role in the development of the sector. The partnership between the government, regulator and industry stakeholders is a key factor in ensuring the sector’s successful growth. This collaboration is evident in events, initiatives and a collaborative approach to introducing new laws and regulations which all result in the Cayman Islands continuing to be a robust, dynamic, well-regulated and progressive financial services jurisdiction. These insights reflect the dynamic and evolving nature of the Cayman Islands’ international captive, insurance and reinsurance industry, highlighting its strategic positioning, regulatory environment, growth trends and the government’s role in fostering industry development.

CR: How can Appleby help?

A: Our multi-disciplinary (re)insurance team is composed of market leading experts in their sectors. We advise on all aspects of (re)insurance law and regulation and are attuned to and often involved in shaping the latest regulatory developments within the sector. Our team have substantial experience in establishing new entities and successfully leading (re) insurers through the CIMA licensing process as well as assisting with ongoing legal and regulatory obligations. We regularly act as Cayman’s counsel on market leading M&A transactions involving Cayman (re) insurers and provide pragmatic advice on structuring, restructuring and financing (re)insurance vehicles.

First published by Cayman Captive Review 2023. 

Share
More publications
JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
24 Jul 2026

Thalassa Investments LP: Section 22 and Specific Discovery - Strategic Considerations for Limited Partners Seeking Information and Documents

In Thalassa Investments LP [2026] CIGC (FSD) 32, the Grand Court refused an application by limited partner petitioners for specific discovery from the general partner in just and equitable proceedings to wind up a Cayman Islands ELP. The ruling was against the backdrop of serious lack of probity allegations made against the general partner by the petitioners. Notwithstanding those allegations, the Grand Court declined to make orders requiring discovery of various categories of documents to be used at trial.   The ruling brings into focus the multiple routes potentially open to limited partners seeking information and/or documents from an ELP where there are allegations of mismanagement by the general partner. The limited partner may issue substantive proceedings (or, as in this case, present a just and equitable winding up petition) against the general partner and partnership, and then obtain documents through the usual discovery process. Alternatively, the limited partner may pursue its substantive right to true and full information under section 22 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act first in order to help inform the bringing of a substantive claim, as was the approach in the Neoma (Abraaj) and the Port Fund litigation. Thalassa illustrates that the nature of the information sought, who holds it, and the legal basis on which disclosure is sought are all highly relevant to the outcome. The decision also highlights that section 22 and discovery serve different purposes, are governed by different legal tests and can produce different outcomes. The strategic question is not whether section 22 or the discovery process may be preferable in the abstract, but which legal framework best aligns with the limited partner’s objectives and the nature of the information sought.

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance
13 Jul 2026

Guide to Loans & Secured Financing in the Cayman Islands 2026

This guide provides local insights into the legal and regulatory framework governing bank lending and finance. It covers key topics including bank loans versus debt securities, common forms of bank loan facilities, bridge financing, the roles of agents, trustees and lenders, and governing laws. It also examines the regulatory landscape, including capital, liquidity and disclosure requirements, the use of loan proceeds, cross-border lending, and interest rate and currency restrictions. In addition, the guide explores security interests and guarantees, the impact of fraudulent conveyance and similar doctrines on bank loan financing structures, intercreditor arrangements, loan terms and structures, and recent market developments.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
9 Jul 2026

A Warning to Litigants Seeking Funding: English High Court Clarifies the Limits of Litigation Privilege

Important for Cayman litigants, funders and attorneys given the growing use of third-party funding in disputes.

Appleby-Website-Fraud-and-Asset-Tracing
8 Jul 2026

A Cautionary Tale in Interim Injunctive Relief: Lessons from Dixon v Seymour

In a recent judgment of Chief Justice Ramsay-Hale, the Cayman Grand Court provided guidance on the necessary components of an application for interim injunctive relief. The ruling illustrates how an ex parte application may fail to satisfy the American Cyanamid test when unsupported by proper evidence.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
7 Jul 2026

CIMA’s 2026 Reinsurance Thematic Review: Focus Points for Boards

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published its 2026 Thematic Review of Reinsurance Companies (Thematic Review). This reflects fieldwork conducted by CIMA between mid-2025 and Q1 2026 at selected Class B(iii) and Class D licensed reinsurers. The focus being on compliance with the Insurance Act (as revised) and other applicable legislation, regulations, rules and statements of guidance as issued by CIMA centering around stress-testing, cash flow testing frameworks, capital and collateral adequacy management, and corporate governance. Corporate governance weaknesses account for 68% of all findings with the remaining 32% spread across stress-testing, cash flow testing capital and collateral adequacy. Notwithstanding these findings, CIMA has noted several good practices across all areas including, importantly, comprehensive risk management frameworks covering key risk areas and strong capital and collateral adequacy monitoring processes. With Cayman’s reinsurance sector having grown to an institutional scale, and over 110 licensed reinsurers writing in the order of US$30 billion in annual premiums against over US$100 billion in assets, this latest Thematic Review demonstrates development in CIMA’s supervisory expectations of Cayman’s licensed reinsurers. It represents a reflection of the jurisdiction’s increasingly sophisticated and maturing reinsurance market and reinforces that CIMA’s expectations align closely with the standards that onshore counterparty cedants, rating agencies and US state regulators already expect. We take this opportunity to review certain of the key findings alongside CIMA’s cross-sectoral 2026 Thematic Review on Outsourcing, note some of the good practices highlighted by CIMA and make some associated recommendations for Cayman reinsurers.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
25 Jun 2026

CIMA Enforcement Action in Focus: Reminders and Recommendations

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has recently published a number of Enforcement Notices that provide helpful context for regulated entities, including Licensees and Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA), seeking to understand and meet their ongoing regulatory obligations in the Cayman Islands. In early June 2026, CIMA exercised its enforcement powers under SIBA Section 17 to cancel the registrations of several SIBA Registered Persons on the basis that it had reasonable grounds to believe that such Registered Persons had failed to meet certain key regulatory obligations. The Appleby Team takes this opportunity to review the relevant findings and CIMA enforcement action; and to highlight certain key obligations that attach to regulated entities in the Cayman Islands.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
23 Jun 2026

Important Cayman Islands Industry Advisory: Common Reporting Standard 2.0 and Economic Substance Updates

Further to the introduction of the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 (the CRS Amendment Regulations or CRS 2.0), the Cayman Islands Department for International Tax Cooperation (DITC) has issued an Industry Advisory flagging certain key updates in respect of Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and Economic Substance (ES) reporting in the Cayman Islands. Cayman Financial Institutions will be required file 2025 CRS Returns and Declarations by 31 July 2026, ahead of the online DITC Portal’s closure to facilitate its transition to XML Schema v3.0. ES courtesy reminders (which have historically been sent by email to designated Responsible Persons in advance of annual ES reporting deadlines) will no longer be issued such that Relevant Entities will need to independently track such deadlines themselves. Updated Individual and Entity CRS Self-Certification forms, aligned with CRS 2.0, are now available online via the DITC website.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
18 Jun 2026

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [2026] CIGC (FSD) 22, the Grand Court clarified the scope of joint provisional liquidators' powers following their appointment. In particular, the Court confirmed that the appointment of provisional liquidators does not automatically displace existing directors.

Appleby-Website-Cayman2
17 Jun 2026

Property, Fairness and the Constitution: The Grand Court Marks the Boundaries of Freedom of Information

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands has overturned a decision of the Ombudsman in a successful judicial review brought by Caribbean Utilities Company, Ltd. (CUC), represented by Appleby.