Hot topics

Published: 17 Mar 2020
Type: Insight

Update on the new Private Funds Law and amendment to the Mutual Funds Law, the Securities Investment Business Law (SIBL), the beneficial ownership registration regime and more.

THE NEW PRIVATE FUNDS LAW AND AMENDMENT TO THE MUTUAL FUNDS LAW IN FORCE NOW

Application

For the purposes of the Private Funds Law, a ‘private fund’ is a company, unit trust or partnership whose principal business is the offering and issuing of its investment interests, the purpose or effect of which is the pooling of investor funds with the aim of spreading investment risks and enabling investors to receive profits or gains from such entity’s acquisition, holding, management or disposal of investments, where (a) the holders of investment interests do not have day-to-day control over the acquisition, holding, management or disposal of the investments; and (b) the investments are managed as a whole by or on behalf of the operator of the private fund, directly or indirectly, for reward based on the assets, profits or gains of the fund.  Private funds do not include, however, single investor funds; regulated mutual funds under the Mutual Funds Law (as amended); persons licensed under the Banks and Trust Companies Law or the Insurance Law; persons registered under the Building Societies Law or the Friendly Societies Law; or, importantly, any non-fund arrangements – the list of which is extensive and includes:

pension funds; securitisation special purpose vehicles; contracts of insurance; joint ventures; proprietary vehicles; officer, manager or employee incentive, participation or compensation schemes, and programmes or schemes to similar effect; holding vehicles; individual investment management arrangements; debt issues and debt issuing vehicles; structured finance vehicles; preferred equity financing vehicles; funds whose investment interests are listed on a specified stock exchange; sovereign wealth funds; and single family offices.

Registration and Audit

A private fund will need to register, pay an annual fee, and file prescribed details with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) within 21 days following the fund’s acceptance of capital commitments from investors for the purposes of investments.  However, the private fund may not accept capital contributions from investors in respect of investments until it is registered.  The registration date of a fund is expected to be the date that a complete application is filed with CIMA, assuming that the application is fully compliant with the law.  A private fund must also have its accounts audited annually by an approved auditor and signed off on and filed with CIMA by a local auditor within six months of its financial year end along with an annual return (in the same manner as for mutual funds). An offering document need not be prepared or filed.

Valuation

A private fund must have appropriate and consistent procedures for the purposes of proper valuations of its assets to be carried out at a frequency that is appropriate to the assets held and, in any event, at least annually (e.g. as part of the audit process).  Valuations of the assets of a private fund may be performed by independent third parties appropriately professionally qualified to conduct valuations; by the manager or operator of the private fund, or a person who has a control relationship with the manager of the private fund (provided that the valuation function is independent from the portfolio management function or potential conflicts of interest are properly identified and disclosed to the investors of the fund); or by an administrator appointed by the fund.  CIMA may exempt a private fund from the valuation requirements either absolutely or subject to such conditions as it may deem appropriate.

Safekeeping

A private fund must also appoint a custodian to hold in custody, in segregated accounts opened in the name, or for the account, of the fund, the custodial fund assets; and verify, based on information provided by the fund and available external information, that the private fund holds title to any other fund assets and maintain a record of those assets.  A private fund shall not be required to appoint a custodian, however, if it has notified CIMA and it is neither practical nor proportionate to do so, having regard to the nature of the fund and the type of assets it holds.  Where a private fund so notifies CIMA, the fund must appoint one of the following to carry out the title verification: an administrator or another independent third party; or the manager or operator, or a person with a control relationship with the manager of the fund (provided that the title verification function is independent from the portfolio management function or potential conflicts of interest are properly identified and disclosed to the investors of the fund).

Cash Monitoring

A private fund must appoint an administrator, custodian or an independent third party or the manager or operator to monitor the cash flows of the fund; ensure that all cash of the private fund has been booked in cash accounts opened in the name, or for the account, of the private fund; and ensure that all payments made by investors to the private fund in respect of investment interests have been received.

Identification of Securities

A private fund that regularly trades securities or holds them on a consistent basis must maintain a record of the identification codes of the securities it trades and holds (e.g. ISIN codes).

Alternative Investment Vehicles and Restricted Scope Private Funds

Under the Private Funds Regulations, an ‘alternative investment vehicle’ means a company, unit trust, partnership or other similar vehicle that (a) is formed in accordance with the constitutional documents of a private fund for the purposes of making, holding and disposing of one or more investments wholly or mainly related to the business of that private fund; and (b) only has as its members, partners or trust beneficiaries, persons that are members, partners or trust beneficiaries of the private fund.

Where IFRS or GAAP of a non-high risk jurisdiction permit consolidated or combined financial account reporting and a private fund chooses to report consolidated or combined financial statements with an alternative investment vehicle, the requirements described above pertaining to audit, valuation, safe keeping, cash monitoring and  identification of securities do not apply to such alternative investment vehicle.

Under the Private Funds Regulations, a ‘restricted scope private fund’ is a private fund that is (a) an exempted limited partnership; (b) managed or advised by a person who is licensed or registered by CIMA or authorised or registered by a recognised overseas regulatory authority; and (c) in which all of the investors are non-retail in nature, being either high net worth persons or sophisticated persons.

Aside from these provisions, there are no further references to either alternative investment vehicles or restricted scope private funds and we expect that further guidance will be issued in due course with respect to these new categories.

Supervision and Enforcement

CIMA has been given broad supervision and enforcement powers in respect of private funds analogous to those already in place in the context of mutual funds.

Timing

Existing private funds and private funds formed after 7 February 2020 must register with CIMA no later than 7 August 2020 (or such later date as may be specified by CIMA).

Mutual Funds (Amendment) Law

This law primarily introduces a registration requirement for what was previously referred to as an ‘exempt’ fund, having fifteen or fewer investors the majority of whom have the power to remove/appoint the operator. This will now be a regulated fund required to register, pay a fee, and file with CIMA prescribed details as well as audited accounts (annually, via an approved auditor).  Such funds must register with CIMA no later than 7 August 2020 (or such later date as may be specified by CIMA).

The new laws seek to strike a balance to achieve their dual purposes of strengthening investor confidence in Cayman Islands investment funds and ensuring that the Cayman Islands remains the preeminent jurisdiction for investment fund formation.  The new laws also address EU suggestions for investment fund oversight, as set forth in a report dated 27 May 2019 from the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation).  The Ministry of Financial Services worked closely with a Cayman Islands based working group comprised of CIMA and fund professionals, including accounting, audit, administration, governance and legal firms, in drafting the laws.

CIMA has released notices and FAQs confirming procedures.  Funds that register before the 7 August 2020 deadline will not incur registration fees for 2020 (only an application fee of USD366).  The annual fee going forward will be USD4,268.

CIMA has also indicated that an audit for the 2020 financial year will be required (to be filed by no later than 30 June 2021).

END OF THE TRANSITION PERIOD FOR EXCLUDED PERSONS UNDER THE SECURITIES INVESTMENT BUSINESS LAW

Appleby’s e-alert from July 2019 explained certain key changes to the regulatory framework and ongoing filings required for persons regulated under the Securities Investment Business Law (Revised) (SIBL), including the requirement for former ‘Excluded Persons’ to re-register as ‘Registered Persons’.

The deadline for re-registration of Excluded Persons was 15 January 2020.  A former Excluded Person who did not file a re-registration application by that date will be required to file a new application for registration after that date. Previous failure to comply with filing requirements under the SIBL may be grounds for CIMA to refuse to register an applicant going forward.

See also our note below regarding the application of economic substance requirements to re-registering Excluded Persons.

REGISTER OF MEMBERS REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE COMPANIES LAW

Operators of Cayman Islands companies are reminded that 7 February 2020 was the deadline to ensure that their register of members specifies, with respect to each category of shares, whether such category of shares carries voting rights and, if so, whether such voting rights are conditional. The Companies (Amendment) Law, 2019 had introduced this requirement on 8 August 2019. Companies incorporated on or before that date had six months (until 7 February 2020) to update their register of members.

For the purposes of the register of members, the Companies (Amendment) Law, 2020 redefined ‘voting rights’ to include the right to appoint or remove directors.

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REGISTRATION REGIME

The Companies (Amendment) Law, 2020 and the Limited Liability Companies (Amendment) Law, 2020, although largely in force from 19 February 2020, introduced certain changes to the Cayman Islands beneficial ownership registration regime which are not yet in force. The pending changes are:

  • the threshold for including an UBO on the register will be amended to 25% or more (rather than more than 25%); and
  • one of the thresholds for determining whether an entity (Company S) is a subsidiary of one or more legal entities will be amended to such legal entities, separately or collectively, holding 75% or more (rather than in excess of 75%) of the shares or voting rights in Company S.

Where an entity has not filed with the Registry of Companies either a declaration stating that it is exempt or filed a register if not exempt (including a nil register), that entity will not be entitled to receive a Certificate of Good Standing (COGS) until such time as the register is filed.

Government is still deciding how to deal with newly-incorporated entities, i.e. how long they will have to file a register following incorporation before the failure to do so would result in not being able to obtain a COGS.  Government has also been examining and considering reducing available exemptions from the requirement to prepare beneficial ownership registers, including for investment funds. In the initial proposal, whilst the information for an investment fund would not need to be filed with government, it would need to be maintained in the event it was requested.

Additionally, the Cayman Islands government has introduced an online protocol for the filing of beneficial ownership information. Some users have experienced technical issues with the use of the new online portal.  Where that is the case, government has advised that the manual filing protocol should be continued to allow industry to fulfill its legal obligations. Once the technical issues are resolved, government expects to issue amended user guidance.

WHAT TO DO NOW

Operators of existing investment funds not currently registered with CIMA should consider whether either the Private Funds Law or the Mutual Funds (Amendment) Law applies to their fund, so as to now bring their fund into the scope of CIMA’s regulation.

Recommended compliance steps include:

  • Check the fund’s current registration status on CIMA’s website
  • Consult with Appleby or your other advisors to determine (i) the basis on which the fund was previously excluded from registration with CIMA and (ii) whether registration is now required
  • If registration is required:
    • register with CIMA by the applicable deadline
    • engage with your fund’s auditors to ensure audit arrangements for the 2020 financial year are put in place
Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
16 Feb 2026

Preparing for and Managing a CIMA Onsite Inspection

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) is empowered, under the Monetary Authority Act and certain other regulatory laws, to inspect regulated financial service providers (FSP) in the Cayman Islands such as banks, trust companies, administrators, investment managers and virtual asset service providers for compliance with applicable regulatory frameworks. CIMA routinely conducts onsite inspections of such regulated entities – which can be full-scope (involving a review of all areas of a regulated entity's business operations) or thematically focused on specific areas such as corporate governance and/or internal controls, policies and procedures pertaining to AML/CFT/CPF. With the breadth and number of onsite inspections carried out by CIMA having increased through 2024 and 2025 we consider, in this briefing: (i) the CIMA onsite inspection process; (ii) the latest feedback available from CIMA in respect of inspections conducted to date; and (iii) some frequently asked questions in relation to CIMA onsite inspections.

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution
16 Feb 2026

Injunctive Relief in Another Form? Cayman Court's Jurisdiction to Appoint JPLs Despite Ongoing Arbitration

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [link],[1] the Grand Court confirmed that it has jurisdiction to appoint provisional liquidators notwithstanding the fact that the company’s shareholders are engaged in an arbitration over its affairs, as mandated by a binding arbitration agreement. This article considers the decision and its implications.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
11 Feb 2026

When the Court intervenes… and when it does not: Grand Court Reaffirms Limited Curial Intervention in Support of Foreign Arbitrations

The Financial Services Division of the Grand Court’s judgment in In the matter of A v B & C (FSD 270 of 2025) provides a timely reminder of the proper boundaries between national courts and international arbitration tribunals in respect of the grant of interim relief. The decision underscores the Cayman Islands' commitment to the principle of limited curial intervention and confirms that the Court’s powers under section 54 of the Arbitration Act 2012 are ancillary to the arbitral process and are only to be exercised when the tribunal cannot provide effective relief itself. The judgment helpfully sets out clear parameters for those seeking ancillary relief and highlights that the Cayman courts will support arbitration proceedings without supplanting them.

Website-Code-Cayman-2
5 Feb 2026

Recusal For Apparent Bias Is Not A New Frontier

In Re New Frontier Health Corporation,[1] Justice Doyle decided to recuse himself, such that he would not hear the trial listed to commence weeks later, on the basis that he made findings in his recent Re 51job Inc judgment, as to the reliability and credibility of the same two experts who would give evidence at the New Frontier trial. The New Frontier judgment represents a further endorsement by the Cayman courts of the fundamental maxim that justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
4 Feb 2026

The New Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework – Relevance for Cayman Investment Funds

The Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) Regulations, 2025 (CARF Regulations) came into effect on 1 January 2026 and provide for the collection, reporting and automatic exchange of information on transactions in crypto-assets.  The CARF Regulations will operate in a similar fashion to the existing Cayman Common Reporting Standard (CRS) regime which facilitates the automatic exchange of financial account information.  For information on recent changes to the CRS, please see our December advisory here.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
27 Jan 2026

CIMA Launches Prudential Information Survey for SIBA Registered Persons

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published a General Industry Notice launching a new Prudential Information Survey for Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (SIBA) of the Cayman Islands.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
15 Dec 2025

Aquapoint LP v Fan: Privy Council Confirms Equitable Constraints Can Override Strict Contractual Rights in Cayman ELP Winding Up

In its recent judgment in Aquapoint LP (in Official Liquidation) v Fan,[1] the Privy Council upheld the judgments of the Grand Court and Cayman Islands Court of Appeal (CICA). The ruling confirms that the exercise of strict legal rights under a limited partnership agreement – even one containing detailed contractual terms and “entire agreement” clauses – can nevertheless be subject to equitable considerations in certain circumstances. Where those equitable considerations arise, they may justify the winding up of an exempted limited partnership on the “just and equitable” basis. Appleby acts for the joint official liquidators of Aquapoint; for further details on the background of this case, see Appleby’s previous article here.