Are You Ready to File Your CRS Compliance Form?

Published: 9 Sep 2024

Cayman Islands entities classified as reporting financial institutions (Reporting FIs) under the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) framework are required to file their CRS compliance form by 16 September 2024 using the Cayman Islands Department for International Tax Cooperation (DITC) online portal.

Primary Contact

Simon Raftopoulos

Partner: Cayman Islands

T +1 345 814 2748
E [email protected]

Menelik Miller, Miriam Smyth, Maree Martin, Simon Raftopoulos

Background

The Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) Regulations 2021 implements CRS requirements on an international basis under Cayman Islands law. The CRS framework (in particular, the CRS reporting framework) represents a globally coordinated approach whereby income earned by individuals and entities is disclosed for tax transparency purposes.

The CRS compliance form requires a Reporting FI to: (i) disclose information relating to its financial accounts for the particular reporting period; (ii) confirm that it has and maintains written CRS policies and procedures; and (iii) confirm whether or not it is licensed or registered with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. That form is in addition to the annual CRS return which should have been filed for the 2023 reporting period by 31 July 2024.

CRS Compliance Form

In order to complete and submit the CRS compliance form, the Reporting FI must identify and confirm the tax residence status of all new and existing clients during 2023. In practice, this means the Reporting FI must obtain self-certifications regarding the CRS status of its clients. In order to collect tax identification numbers and other personal data on clients, the Reporting FI should have a data protection client information notice covering why that data is being collected, the purpose of the data, what data will be reported to the Cayman Islands Tax Information Authority (TIA) via the DITC portal and informing them that the TIA may exchange that information with other overseas tax authorities.

Please note as the 15 September 2024 deadline falls on a Sunday, the deadline for filing the form is the 16 September 2024.

Enforcement

The TIA can impose financial penalties for mis-classifying legal entities and for non-compliance with the CRS reporting framework. We understand that there has been an increase in the frequency of CRS (and FATCA) compliance reviews initiated by the TIA following the TIA’s publication of its enforcement guidelines in August 2022 (and updated in March 2023) (available here).

Commentary

The shift towards greater tax transparency measures is evident and there has been an increased focus on having and maintaining appropriate written CRS policies and procedures to ensure the effective implementation of, and compliance with, due diligence and reporting procedures by Reporting FIs.

How Appleby and Appleby Global Services can help

Appleby’s regulatory team and Appleby Global Services (list of available services here) supports clients in complying with their CRS obligations across the financial services industry by providing the following services:

CRS legal entity classification: identifying an entity’s CRS status and any related DITC registration and reporting requirements;
DITC registration: registering a Reporting FI on the DITC’s portal;
DITC reporting: preparing and filing the annual CRS return (due by 31 July each year);
CRS policies and procedures: preparing written CRS policies and procedures to demonstrate compliance with CRS due-diligence and reporting obligations;
DITC audit assistance: assisting a Reporting FI in preparing for a DITC audit and successfully guiding them through the process; and
CRS self-certification forms: advising on completing or reviewing self-certification forms.

More publications

16 Feb 2026

Preparing for and Managing a CIMA Onsite Inspection

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) is empowered, under the Monetary Authority Act and certain other regulatory laws, to inspect regulated financial service providers (FSP) in the Cayman Islands such as banks, trust companies, administrators, investment managers and virtual asset service providers for compliance with applicable regulatory frameworks. CIMA routinely conducts onsite inspections of such regulated entities – which can be full-scope (involving a review of all areas of a regulated entity's business operations) or thematically focused on specific areas such as corporate governance and/or internal controls, policies and procedures pertaining to AML/CFT/CPF. With the breadth and number of onsite inspections carried out by CIMA having increased through 2024 and 2025 we consider, in this briefing: (i) the CIMA onsite inspection process; (ii) the latest feedback available from CIMA in respect of inspections conducted to date; and (iii) some frequently asked questions in relation to CIMA onsite inspections.

Martin Byers, Simon Raftopoulos, Peter Colegate, Maree Martin, Menelik Miller

Appleby-Website-Arbitration-and-Dispute-Resolution

16 Feb 2026

Injunctive Relief in Another Form? Cayman Court's Jurisdiction to Appoint JPLs Despite Ongoing Arbitration

In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd [link],[1] the Grand Court confirmed that it has jurisdiction to appoint provisional liquidators notwithstanding the fact that the company’s shareholders are engaged in an arbitration over its affairs, as mandated by a binding arbitration agreement. This article considers the decision and its implications.

David Lee, Will Porter

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice

11 Feb 2026

When the Court intervenes… and when it does not: Grand Court Reaffirms Limited Curial Intervention in Support of Foreign Arbitrations

The Financial Services Division of the Grand Court’s judgment in In the matter of A v B & C (FSD 270 of 2025) provides a timely reminder of the proper boundaries between national courts and international arbitration tribunals in respect of the grant of interim relief. The decision underscores the Cayman Islands' commitment to the principle of limited curial intervention and confirms that the Court’s powers under section 54 of the Arbitration Act 2012 are ancillary to the arbitral process and are only to be exercised when the tribunal cannot provide effective relief itself. The judgment helpfully sets out clear parameters for those seeking ancillary relief and highlights that the Cayman courts will support arbitration proceedings without supplanting them.

David Lee, Zuhair Farouki

5 Feb 2026

Recusal For Apparent Bias Is Not A New Frontier

In Re New Frontier Health Corporation,[1] Justice Doyle decided to recuse himself, such that he would not hear the trial listed to commence weeks later, on the basis that he made findings in his recent Re 51job Inc judgment, as to the reliability and credibility of the same two experts who would give evidence at the New Frontier trial. The New Frontier judgment represents a further endorsement by the Cayman courts of the fundamental maxim that justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done.

Andrew Jackson, Charlotte Walker

4 Feb 2026

The New Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework – Relevance for Cayman Investment Funds

The Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) Regulations, 2025 (CARF Regulations) came into effect on 1 January 2026 and provide for the collection, reporting and automatic exchange of information on transactions in crypto-assets. The CARF Regulations will operate in a similar fashion to the existing Cayman Common Reporting Standard (CRS) regime which facilitates the automatic exchange of financial account information. For information on recent changes to the CRS, please see our December advisory here.

Matt Mulry, Martin Byers, Peter Colegate, Maree Martin

27 Jan 2026

CIMA Launches Prudential Information Survey for SIBA Registered Persons

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) has published a General Industry Notice launching a new Prudential Information Survey for Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (SIBA) of the Cayman Islands.

Martin Byers, Simon Raftopoulos, Sailaja Alla, Matt Mulry, Maree Martin

16 Jan 2026

Compulsory ADR in Cayman: Court Confirms It Has Teeth But Declines to Bite

David Lee, Zuhair Farouki

15 Dec 2025

Aquapoint LP v Fan: Privy Council Confirms Equitable Constraints Can Override Strict Contractual Rights in Cayman ELP Winding Up

In its recent judgment in Aquapoint LP (in Official Liquidation) v Fan,[1] the Privy Council upheld the judgments of the Grand Court and Cayman Islands Court of Appeal (CICA). The ruling confirms that the exercise of strict legal rights under a limited partnership agreement – even one containing detailed contractual terms and “entire agreement” clauses – can nevertheless be subject to equitable considerations in certain circumstances. Where those equitable considerations arise, they may justify the winding up of an exempted limited partnership on the “just and equitable” basis. Appleby acts for the joint official liquidators of Aquapoint; for further details on the background of this case, see Appleby’s previous article here.