Cayman Islands Regulatory Round Up - Winter 2025/26

Published: 3 Mar 2026
Type: Insight

This Round Up provides a concise yet thorough summary of regulatory developments relevant to financial service providers (FSPs) and other stakeholders in the Cayman Islands.  It highlights key legislative changes, publications and updates by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) and Department for International Tax Cooperation (DITC), updates on financial sanctions, and anticipates key upcoming changes through “horizon scanning”.  Links to relevant underlying CIMA and/or DITC publications, as well as related Appleby published briefings and e-alerts are available throughout this summary. All information provided is “as of” February 2026.


Recent and upcoming Filings and Deadlines

15 January 2026: Deadline for the payment of annual CIMA fees (which include the fund annual return filing fee for 2026).  Also the deadline for the renewal of annual CIMA director registrations for mutual funds.

31 January 2026: Deadline to file economic substance notification with the DITC.  Also the deadline for annual returns and annual fees payable to the Registrar.

15 March 2026: Date after which failure to pay incremental CIMA fee increases for 2026 will attract penalties.  See CIMA Notice of 13 February 2026.

31 March 2026: Date by which new Prudential Information Survey for Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA) should be filed with CIMA. See CIMA Notice of 31 December 2025.

KEY legislative DEVELOPMENTS

2026 Consolidations of Note:

The Cayman Islands Government has published a range of 2026 revised and/or consolidated Acts and Regulations, including amongst others, the Beneficial Ownership Transparency Act, Beneficial Ownership Transparency Regulations, Companies Act, and International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Act.

Virtual Asset Service Providers Regime

The Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment) Bill, 2026 (not yet in force) will, when brought into effect, amend the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act (2024 Revision) (VASP Act) to change the definition of “issuance of virtual assets” or “virtual asset issuance” to mean the sale of newly created virtual assets to the public in or from within the Cayman Islands in exchange for fiat currency, other virtual assets or other consideration.  Excluded from the new definition will be the sale of virtual service tokens and the issuance of:

  • a digital equity token by a tokenized mutual fund in accordance with the Mutual Funds Act (2025 Revision); or
  • (ii) a digital investment token by a tokenized private fund in accordance with the Private Funds Act (2025 Revision).

The amendments clarify that the issuance, creation, sale, transfer or other disposition of tokenized equity or investment interests by regulated mutual funds and regulated private funds will not be considered to be an issuance of virtual assets under the VASP Act.  This Bill was published together with the Mutual Funds (Amendment) Bill, 2026 which defines a “digital equity token” as a digital representation of an investor’s entire equity interest in a mutual fund, and the Private Funds (Amendment) Bill, 2026 which introduces the concept of a “digital investment token” for private funds.

The above mutual fund and private fund amendment Bills attach additional obligations to operators of tokenized funds, including obligations to: (i) confirm annually to CIMA that all records relating to the issuance, creation, sale, transfer and ownership of digital tokens have been properly maintained; (ii) require any transfer of tokenized interests to be approved in accordance with the offering materials; and (iii) require the disclosure of risks specific to digital tokens and how those risk are mitigated for investors.

CIMA – Desk Based Review of Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs)

In November 2025, CIMA reported its findings from its thematic desk-based review conducted from September 2024 to February 2025 in respect of 11 regulated VASPs (available here).  CIMA identified several good practices as well as areas for improvement.  Key findings in this respect highlighted significant gaps in corporate governance, cybersecurity and asset custody with CIMA urging regulated entities to strengthen internal controls.

VASP Rules and Statements of Guidance

In February 2026, CIMA issued a Rule and Statement of Guidance on Market Conduct for VASPs (MC-RSOG) applicable to all VASPs authorized under the VASP Act, and issued updated versions of the existing Rule – Obligations for the provision of virtual asset services – Virtual Asset Custodians and Virtual Asset Trading Platforms and Statement of Guidance for the provision of virtual asset services – Virtual Asset Custodians and Virtual Asset Trading Platforms (Custody and VATP R&SOG) which were each originally published in December 2024.

The MC-RSOG reiterates minimum standards governing how VASPs interact with clients and the market and that VASPs are expected to act with honesty, integrity, due skill and due care throughout the client lifecycle, including in client communications, transaction execution and ongoing servicing. MC-RSOG requirements include, amongst other things, robust conflicts of interest management, complaints handling procedures, protection of client assets, confidentiality of client information, fair marketing practices and transparent disclosures.  In addition, it is expected that insurance coverage is maintained, or where insurance is unavailable, alternative risk mitigation measures are put in place.

The updates to the Custody and VATP R&SOG largely involved the removal of various provisions that are covered in detail in the MC-RSOG.

Companies (Amendment) Act, 2024

The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2024 came into effect on 1 January 2026 and introduced a number of welcome enhancements to the jurisdiction’s existing corporate law, including:

  • Introduction of a streamlined, cost-effective process for effecting capital reductions by way of special resolutions and directors’ solvency statement; removing the requirement for a formal court application.
  • Expanded continuation provisions which allow for a company incorporated overseas to transfer the its registration to the Cayman Islands as an exempted company.
  • Re-registration and conversion provisions allowing for conversion between limited liability companies, foundation companies and exempted companies. Exempted companies may also re-register as ordinary resident companies.

For further details, see our November briefing here.

Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) (Amendment) Regulations, 2025

Key changes to the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) as implemented in the Cayman Islands took effect from 1 January 2026, with certain provisions set to take effect in 2027.  The relevant amendments to the CRS are intended to align this regime with the new CARF framework (see below) and to avoid duplicative reporting.  Key amendments include:

  • The definition of “financial assets” has been expanded to include crypto-assets and to bring certain electronic money products and central bank digital currencies into scope.
  • Cayman Financial Institutions (FI) will be required to appoint a person in the Cayman Islands as their principal point of contact (PPoC). Notification of the Cayman PPoC and the date on which an FI became an FI will need to be provided to the DITC by 1 January 2027.
  • For FIs that commenced activities during 2025, the DITC registration deadline will continue to be 30 April 2026. However new FIs that commenced activities from 1 January 2026 will be required to register on the DITC portal by 31 January 2027.
  • The 2025 reporting year annual CRS return filing deadline and compliance form due date will stay the same (31 July 2026 and 15 September 2026 respectively). However, for the 2026 reporting year, the CRS return filing deadline and compliance form due date will both be 30 June 2027.

Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework

The Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework) Regulations, 2025 implemented a new Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) with effect from 1 January 2026, a regime similar in operation to the existing CRS regime.  CARF applies to entities that are incorporated, registered, established or regulated in the Cayman Islands, or which have a place of effective management in the Cayman Islands, that, as a business provide a service of effectuating relevant exchange transactions (i.e. as between relevant crypto-assets or as between relevant crypto-assets and fiat currencies) for or on behalf of customers, including by acting as a counterparty or intermediary, or by making available a trading platform.

Existing entities that are within scope of CARF will be required to register with the DITC on or before 30 April 2026. Entities that fall within scope on or after 1 January 2026 will need to register by 31 January 2027.

In-scope entities will need to establish and maintain written policies and procedures to comply with CARF, conduct due diligence and obtain self-certifications from customers to determine tax residence and report certain prescribed information to the DITC annually.

Annual reporting is due on or before 30 June; accordingly, the first reports under the CARF regime will be due by 30 June 2027 in respect of the reporting period 1 January 2026 to 31 December 2026.

Beneficial Ownership Regime

Now consolidated in the 2026 Revision of the Beneficial Ownership Transparency Act, recent amendments to the Beneficial Ownership regime were introduced through the Beneficial Ownership Transparency (Amendment) Act, 2025, Beneficial Ownership Transparency (Amendment) (No. 2) Act, 2025, Beneficial Ownership Transparency (Amendment) Regulations, 2025 and Beneficial Ownership Transparency (Amendment) Regulations, 2026.

The most recent amendments include:

  • A requirement for companies that are subsidiaries of listed entities to provide the name of their parent company when reporting in order to assist the competent authority to understand the relevant corporate structure;
  • Expanded provisions for sharing beneficial ownership information with foreign authorities that have similar responsibilities for combatting money laundering and terrorist financing;
  • Clarification that administrative fines are maximum fines rather than a flat penalties which allows for the imposition of lower fines for inadvertent breaches or technical difficulties; and
  • Clarification of the procedures for issuing restrictions notices when entities fail to comply with information requests; providing a clear 30 day timeline for responses.

Government Fee Increases

A range of fee increases came into effect on 1 January 2026 affecting CIMA regulated entities.  CIMA’s updated fee schedule dated January 2026 is available here.

DITC Updates

December 2025: The DITC issued an Industry Advisory in respect of Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) functionality which is now available on the DITC Portal.  The CbCR filing deadline is generally twelve months after the last day of the reporting fiscal year.  However, for in-scope multinational enterprise (MNE) Groups with a filing deadline between 31 July 2025 and 31 December 2025, an extension was granted to submit the 2024 fiscal year filings until 27 February 2026.

CIMA publications

A series of Notices and other publications were issued by CIMA between July 2025 and the date of this Round Up:

July 2025

  • Notice regarding CIMA’s revised Regulatory handbook and its Enforcement Manual which contains the framework governing CIMA’s enforcement regime in instances of non-compliance with Regulatory Acts in force in the Cayman Islands.
  • Notice advising of CIMA’s updated VASP application form APP 101-84-05.
  • Notice advising that the ability to provide operator letters in lieu of notarized affidavits for fund registration and licensing applications which was originally introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic will no longer be permitted from 15 October 2025.

September 2025

  • Notice announcing a short term amnesty for non-compliant registered directors to pay outstanding fees and penalties at a discounted rate. The amnesty ran from 16 September to 15 October, 2025.
  • CIMA Issued a Rule and an associated Regulatory Procedure in respect of the cancellation of licences, registrations or waivers for VASPs.
  • CIMA published a Supervisory Circular outlining its findings relating to AML/CFT on-site and off-site inspections of virtual asset service providers.

October 2025 – The REEFS application form for Private Fund registrations APP-101-77 was replaced with a new form APP-101-77-05.

November 2025

  • Notice that updated forms are required for mutual fund and private fund de-registrations on REEFS from 8 November 2025. Private and mutual fund de-registrations should use form TMF-147-22 v 2 and the termination of a segregated portfolio, series trust or sub-fund should use TRS-142-99 v 2.  Applications submitted by email will no longer be accepted.
  • Notice advising that all regulated VASPS are required to complete and submit financial returns form VFR-051-84 by 31 December 2025 for the reporting period ending 30 September 2025.

December 2025

  • Notice advising VASPs that from 1 December 2025, the VASP Financial Returns Form is available within REEFS – VFR-051-84.
  • Notice advising all entities registered as SIBA Registered Persons of the requirement to submit a Prudential Information Survey (ADR-046-75-02) for the 2025 calendar year via the REEFS portal. The Survey is available for completion from 1 January 2026 to 31 March 2026. The Survey is required to be completed in addition to the annual declaration (ADR-046-75). For further information and Guidance see here.
  • Notice reminding industry stakeholders of various fee increases taking effect on 1 January 2026.  For entities affected by the increases, no penalties will be assessed until after 15 February 2026.  At a minimum, the 2025 fee amounts should be submitted by the statutory deadline of 15 January 2026. By Further Notice in February 2026, CIMA advised that no penalties would be imposed upon outstanding incremental increases until after 15 February 2026.  Which was by Notice dated 13 February 2026 extended again until 15 March 2026.

January 2026

CIMA issued its Thematic Review on Outsourcing (available here).  In 2025 CIMA reviewed sixteen cross-sector selected entities and evaluated the effectiveness of governance structures, risk assessment practices and oversight controls relating to outsourcing arrangements. The main areas of deficiency identified included inadequate outsourcing agreements; failures to adequately review policies annually or maintain centralized logs of material outsourcing and incomplete risk assessments.

Financial sanctions

November 2025: The Cayman Financial Reporting Authority (FRA) announced a requirement for persons holding or controlling funds or economic resources of designated persons under UK sanctions as at 30 September 2025, to provide a report by 30 November 2025, with annual reporting thereafter.

January 2026: By Public Notice dated 28 January 2026, with effect from 9:00am GMT, the OFSI Consolidated List of Asset Freeze Targets and its search tool were closed.  Going forward, the UK Sanctions List is the only source for all UK sanctions designations.  All ongoing monitoring and searches should be conducted using the UK Sanctions List.

2026 Horizon SCANNING

Looking ahead, and as referred to where appropriate in this Round Up, the Cayman Islands is expected to continue to enhance its existing regulatory frameworks for securities investment businesses, VASPs and in respect of AML/ FT/ CPF and CRS implementation through the end 2026 – with industry consultation on proposed amendments to SIBA and proposed new CIMA Rules on AML/ CFT/ CPF and Financial Sanctions compliance pending.  Anticipated developments in these spaces reflect the jurisdiction’s ongoing commitment to maintaining internationally respected standards and ensuring that the Cayman Islands remains a competitive, reputable and globally recognised international financial centre.

Clients are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the above updates to deadlines and reporting requirements in the Cayman Islands so as to ensure their continued compliance.

PUBLISHED briefings and e-alerts

Appleby has published the following Briefings and E-alerts on its website.

These resources were also sent directly to client subscribers:

June: Minority Shareholder Protections in the Cayman Islands – What are Your Options (11 June 2025)

June: Blockchain Guide – Cayman Islands (17 June 2025)

July: Crypto Funds in the Cayman Islands (1 July 2025)

July: Navigating Cayman Islands Investment Funds: 10 Key FAQs for Emerging Managers (24 July 2025)

August: CRS Compliance and Enforcement in the Cayman Islands – What are the Enforcement Trends? (5 August 2025)

August 2025: Cayman Ultimate General Partners in Subscription Facilities: Do They Ultimately Matter? (12 August 2025)

August 2025: Hong Kong and Australian Courts Recognise Principles of Segregation in Cayman SPCs (21 August 2025)

September 2025: A Guide to Transferring Shares in a Local Company (1 September 2025)

September 2025: CIMA Launches One-Time Amnesty Scheme for Non-Compliant Directors (8 September 2025)

September 2025: Typical Collateral Package in Cayman Fund Financing (25 September 2025)

September 2025: Cayman Islands Foundation Companies Guide 2025 – Part 1 (26 September 2025)

October 2025: Redemption of Cayman Shares in Chinese Red Chip Corporate Groups – Latest Developments and Ideas for Investors (21 October 2025)

November 2025: Guide to Banking and Finance in the Cayman Islands 2025 (11 November 2025)

November 2025: Cayman Companies Act: Key Amendments Coming into Force (12 November 2025)

November 2025: Guide to Private Credit 2026 in the Cayman Islands (24 November 2025)

November 2025:  The Guide to Alternative Funds in the Cayman Islands (26 November 2025)

December 2025:  Cayman Islands: Updated CRS Obligations and CARF Implementation for Cayman Entities – effective 1 January 2026 (8 December 2025)

December 2025: Collateral Beauty: Taking Security In Fund Finance (17 December 2025)

January 2026: Appleby Cayman Expands Corporate Team with Appointment of Martin Byers as Partner & Head of Regulatory (22 January 2026)

January 2026: CIMA Launches Prudential Information Survey for SIBA Registered Persons (27 January 2026)

February 2026: Cayman Islands Sanctions Update: Switching To The UK Sanctions List | Appleby (2 February 2026)

February 2026: The New Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework – Relevance for Cayman Investment Funds (4 February 2026)

February 2026: Preparing for and Managing a CIMA Onsite Inspection (16 February 2026)

How we can help

Keeping up to date with new and proposed legislation and regulations is an ongoing challenge for businesses. Our regulatory team monitors and analyses proposed and upcoming legislative and regulatory developments, to determine the practical implications for our clients.

Our regulatory team has seen increased demand from clients for advice on and assistance in complying with both CIMA and DITC requirements. We continue to:

  • monitor Cayman Islands legal and regulatory developments;
  • produce client focused briefings and e-alerts tracking new developments;
  • contribute to various industry consultations covering legal and regulatory developments affecting our clients’ businesses; and
  • provide training to clients to support their existing compliance frameworks.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require guidance on any of the above developments or assistance with your regulatory obligations.

This information is provided for general information purposes only and does not cover every aspect of the subject matter discussed, and is not intended to constitute legal advice.  For specific regulatory advice, please contact any member of our Appleby regulatory team.

Key contacts
Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
13 Aug 2026

Restructurings Frustrating Creditors And The Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards: The English Court's Decision In State Oil Company Of Azerbaijan V Mansimov Abstract

The English High Court has issued a significant judgment on the enforcement of arbitral awards, the reach of section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the limits of the Marex tort, with potential relevance to the Cayman Islands' Fraudulent Dispositions Act.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
7 Aug 2026

New CIMA Rules on AML/CFT/CPF Compliance and Financial Sanctions Issued in the Cayman Islands

On 20 July 2026, further to an industry consultation, the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA) published the following two new Rules set to introduce binding risk management, governance, sanctions screening and other compliance requirements for regulated financial service providers in the Cayman Islands: (i) Rule on Effective Compliance Programmes for the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing for Financial Services Providers (AML Rule); and (ii) Rule on Compliance with Financial Sanctions and Targeted Financial Sanctions (Sanctions Rule and, together with the AML Rule, the Rules). All CIMA-regulated financial services providers, including investment funds, insurers and reinsurers that are conducting ‘relevant financial business’ as defined under the Proceeds of Crime Act (Revised) (POCA) (FSP), are encouraged to review and update their documented framework of AML/CFT/CPF and sanctions compliance policies, procedures, controls, oversight and reporting mechanisms (Compliance Programmes) to ensure compliance with the Rules by the time they come into force on 18 September 2026.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
5 Aug 2026

Good faith in action, not just belief: the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa and its significance in the Cayman Islands

May a company director depart from a strategy his board has agreed, in the sincere belief that he knows a better route to the company’s success? In Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa [2026] UKSC 21, the Supreme Court held that, whatever the answer, a director cannot pursue his own strategy by concealing it from, and misleading, his fellow directors. The Court confirmed that the good faith duty is not confined to a director’s sincerely held view of the company’s best interests; it also governs the means by which the director acts. The decision is an authoritative statement of the content of the fiduciary duty of loyalty, and is likely to be influential in the Cayman Islands. The decision will interest directors, those who advise or appoint them, and stakeholders affected by directors’ conduct.

Website-Code-Cayman-2
30 Jul 2026

Contingent Creditors, Standing And The Winding Up Jurisdiction: Analysing Re Petrosaudi International

The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal has delivered a highly significant judgment in Re PetroSaudi International.[1] The Court clarified the circumstances in which an alleged contingent creditor will have standing to petition to wind up a company under section 94(1)(b) of the Companies Act, and confirmed that there is no jurisdiction to make a winding up order on an ex parte without notice basis.[2] Our article analyses the Court of Appeal’s decision, and considers its implications for insolvency practitioners.

Website-Code-Cayman-1
30 Jul 2026

Final Means Final: Wei v Wang and the Common Law Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the Cayman Islands

English Court Reaffirms Pro-Enforcement Approach to Foreign Judgments In Wei v Wang [2026] EWHC 1892 (Comm), the Court confirmed that exceptional avenues of review do not undermine the finality of a judgment and reiterated the limited scope of the natural justice defence.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
28 Jul 2026

Drelle Overturned in Latest UK Supreme Court Decision

The United Kingdom Supreme Court in its recent decision in Drelle v Servis-Terminal LLC [2026] UKSC 29 (Drelle SC) has overturned the controversial decision of the English Court of Appeal in Servis-Terminal LLC v Drelle [2025] EWCA Civ 62 (Drelle CA), and in doing so has provided welcome clarity on the effect of unrecognised foreign judgments in cross-border bankruptcy and insolvency contexts. This is likely to have a wide-reaching impact – not only in the UK but also offshore – and particularly in the British Virgin Islands following the recent decision in JJW Hotels & Resorts Holding Inc v Rhodes (BVIHCM2025/0296) (JJW Hotels) (which relied heavily on Drelle CA), and in the Cayman Islands where previous authorities had recognised the ability, in the corporate context, for petitioners to present winding up petitions on the basis of an unrecognised foreign judgment.

JPLs, Directors and Arbitration: Grand Court Clarifies the Scope of Provisional Liquidators' Powers
24 Jul 2026

Thalassa Investments LP: Section 22 and Specific Discovery - Strategic Considerations for Limited Partners Seeking Information and Documents

In Thalassa Investments LP [2026] CIGC (FSD) 32, the Grand Court refused an application by limited partner petitioners for specific discovery from the general partner in just and equitable proceedings to wind up a Cayman Islands ELP. The ruling was against the backdrop of serious lack of probity allegations made against the general partner by the petitioners. Notwithstanding those allegations, the Grand Court declined to make orders requiring discovery of various categories of documents to be used at trial.   The ruling brings into focus the multiple routes potentially open to limited partners seeking information and/or documents from an ELP where there are allegations of mismanagement by the general partner. The limited partner may issue substantive proceedings (or, as in this case, present a just and equitable winding up petition) against the general partner and partnership, and then obtain documents through the usual discovery process. Alternatively, the limited partner may pursue its substantive right to true and full information under section 22 of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act first in order to help inform the bringing of a substantive claim, as was the approach in the Neoma (Abraaj) and the Port Fund litigation. Thalassa illustrates that the nature of the information sought, who holds it, and the legal basis on which disclosure is sought are all highly relevant to the outcome. The decision also highlights that section 22 and discovery serve different purposes, are governed by different legal tests and can produce different outcomes. The strategic question is not whether section 22 or the discovery process may be preferable in the abstract, but which legal framework best aligns with the limited partner’s objectives and the nature of the information sought.

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance
13 Jul 2026

Guide to Loans & Secured Financing in the Cayman Islands 2026

This guide provides local insights into the legal and regulatory framework governing bank lending and finance. It covers key topics including bank loans versus debt securities, common forms of bank loan facilities, bridge financing, the roles of agents, trustees and lenders, and governing laws. It also examines the regulatory landscape, including capital, liquidity and disclosure requirements, the use of loan proceeds, cross-border lending, and interest rate and currency restrictions. In addition, the guide explores security interests and guarantees, the impact of fraudulent conveyance and similar doctrines on bank loan financing structures, intercreditor arrangements, loan terms and structures, and recent market developments.

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
9 Jul 2026

A Warning to Litigants Seeking Funding: English High Court Clarifies the Limits of Litigation Privilege

Important for Cayman litigants, funders and attorneys given the growing use of third-party funding in disputes.