The high costs and reputational risks of failed business acquisitions or combinations (business combinations) have increased the need for bidders, target companies and their respective advisers to ensure that the deal is successful, or that they are adequately protected if they fail.

Upon deciding the appropriate type of business combination, care should to be taken to ensure that the interests of the company are adequately protected during any negotiation period and between signing and closing. The company should also acknowledge and address the concerns of any counterparty with respect to any costs associated with a failed transaction. Consequently, deal protection mechanisms are often pleaded and tend to be some of the most heavily negotiated provisions. In negotiating deal protection mechanisms, each director must give due consideration to his/her fiduciary duties and continue to do so during the process — the core duty being to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company.

Deal protection mechanisms are principally covenants or arrangements between a bidder and target company boards that are intended to discourage alternative and/or superior proposals with a view to protecting a bidder’s transaction if such a proposal materializes. From a bidder’s perspective, the need for deal protection provisions principally arises because, among other things, they do not want to be a stalking horse as it were and they wish to realize synergies and projected benefits from the business combination and minimize competition. Also, a considerable amount of time and cost is spent resulting from both negotiating business combinations and anticipated future opportunities. For these reasons, bidders are typically reluctant to enter into a business combination without protecting the deal to the best extent possible.

Read More

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
11 Oct 2019 |

Purpose-built ISAC a boon for Bermuda

The long-awaited Incorporated Segregated Accounts Companies Act 2019 was tabled in the House of Asse...

3 Oct 2019 |

Maternity/Paternity Leave – Anticipated Amendments to the Employment Act

The Employment (Maternity Leave Extension and Paternity Leave) Amendment Act 2019 (Bill) (2019 Amend...

26 Sep 2019 |

Introduction of the new Collateralised Insurer class

Members of the ILS Bermuda Market Intelligence workstream hosted a roundtable to discuss the Bermuda...

26 Sep 2019 |

Fund bye-laws and payments-in-kind

Typically, a Bermuda fund is incorporated as an exempted mutual fund, formed as an exempted limited ...

18 Sep 2019 |

Offshore listing Vehicles to benefit from the Shanghai - London stock connect

Offshore listing Vehicles to benefit from the Shanghai - London stock connect

Contributors: Huiyan Liew
18 Sep 2019 |

Economic substance requirements in Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands

Economic substance requirements in Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands

Contributors: Shana Simmonds
12 Sep 2019 |

Magistrates’ Court: a summary of procedure

Commencing a claim in a court of summary jurisdiction, also known as the Magistrates’ Court, is a ...

10 Sep 2019 |

Bermuda: weathering all storms in an improving market

The market is moving in the right direction on rates but the landscape is becoming increasingly comp...

5 Sep 2019 |

Cat bond market “here to stay” despite 2019 lull

There has been a distinct slowdown in cat bond issuance throughout 2019 after the heavy loss experie...

4 Sep 2019 |

Cyber insurance to drive innovation, take industry by storm

The structures and products developed to tackle cyber risk over the next five years will take the gl...