In March 2013, Canada Life subscribed to shares, on behalf of British pensioners, in Metatron Global Fund. A request for the redemption of shares was made in July 2013, which was then deferred by the Defendants for a period of six months, i.e., up to 31 January 2014 as per the offering memorandum. Subsequently the Defendants further deferred the payment of redemption proceeds and this triggered proceedings between the parties.

In an attempt to secure the redemption proceeds pending the determination of these proceedings, Canada Life made an application for an attachment order in the sum of USD 1,5 million (which Canada Life deemed to legitimately represent the redemption proceeds of 31 January 2014) to be attached in the account of the Defendants at SBM Bank (Mauritius) Ltd, the garnishee. In order to put an end to this dispute, the parties executed a settlement deed on 13 March 2020 (“Settlement Deed”).

On 27 March 2020, pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Deed, the Defendants made a payment of USD 750,000.00, which Canada Life considered to be in breach of the Settlement Deed as the expected amount payable as redemption proceeds under the offering memorandum and other constitutive documents was USD 1.5 million.

In order to safeguard the remaining redemption proceeds from being dissipated by the Defendants, Canada Life applied for, and was granted, another attachment order in the sum of USD 850,000, attached in the hands of SBM Bank (Mauritius) Ltd. Canada Life then issued proceedings for breach of the Settlement Deed.

The Defendants argued that the Settlement Deed essentially resolved the differences regarding the deferral of the redemption date such that the NAV was no longer an issue. They submitted that the redemption clause of the offering memorandum which provides that all redemptions of shares shall be redeemed at the NAV applicable on the day the shares are actually redeemed in March 2020 as per the Settlement Deed and not on the 31 January 2014.

Canada Life argued that the terms of the Settlement Deed were subject to the constitutive documents and ought to be read together and not taken out of context. Canada Life submitted that pursuant to the Settlement Deed, the Defendants agreed the redemption proceeds could only be paid following the first redemption request made in July 2013 and deferred for a period of up to six months until 31 January 2014.

The Court held:
“… paragraph 1 (of the Settlement Deed) cannot be read on its own but must be read together with the other paragraphs of the settlement deed. In reading the settlement deed in totum and in context, I agree with learned counsel for the plaintiff that on the basis of all the other documents and insofar that payment is made upon redemption request made and for that matter the request date was deferred and there is no dispute regarding the deferment of redemption of shares, the calculation for the NAV of the shares is 31 January 2014 and cannot be 31 March 2020. Furthermore, paragraph 4 of the settlement deed lends support to the submission of learned counsel for the plaintiff that his interpretation of the settlement deed is correct and is to be preferred.”

The Court accepted the submissions of Canada Life in relation to the law and the authorities governing the principles to be applied when interpreting the intention of the parties at the time the documents were constituted.

The Defendants were accordingly ordered to pay Canada Life the remaining amount on the NAV value as at 31 January 2014. A cost order in the amount of USD 100,000 was also issued against the Defendants, in the absence of any significant challenge to oppose the submissions made on costs by Canada Life.

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Deals
31 Aug 2022 | Deals

Appleby Mauritius advises on the Tender Offer in respect of MTN (Mauritius) Investments Limited’s USD750,000,000 4.755%. Notes due 2024

Appleby Mauritius advises MTN (Mauritius) Investments Limited on its Tender Offer of its USD750,000,...

Contributors: Manisha Lallah
3 Feb 2022 | Deals

Appleby Assists Leading Power and Energy Group Zola on USD 90 Million Funding

Leading offshore law firm Appleby has assisted the leading power and energy group ZOLA on its US$ 90...

7 Sep 2021 | Deals

Appleby Mauritius advises IFC in connection with the financing package provided to Aspen Finance Proprietary Limited

Appleby Mauritius advises IFC in this cross border transaction in connection with the financing pack...

Contributors: Manisha Lallah
7 Apr 2021 | Deals

Clean Renewable Power Pte raises US$363 million through senior secured notes

Appleby Mauritius advised in a structured finance deal of US$363 million senior secured notes issued...

31 Mar 2021 | Deals

Cliffton Limited raises US$450 Million through Senior Secured Notes

Appleby Mauritius advised in a structured finance deal of US$450 million 6.25 % senior secured notes...

Contributors: Karishma Beegoo
9 Mar 2021 | Deals

Appleby advises in issuance of USD 500,000,000 3.975% subordinated perpetual securities by Mauritius-based Network i2i Limited

Appleby advises in issuance of USD 500,000,000 3.975% subordinated perpetual securities by Mauritius...

Contributors: Farzanah Nawool
25 Feb 2021 | Deals

India toll roads raises USD 300 million through 5.5% senior secured notes

Appleby Mauritius advised IRB Infrastructure Developers Limited, formerly IRB Infrastructure Develop...

Contributors: Karishma Beegoo
10 Feb 2021 | Deals

MakeMyTrip Limited raises USD 200 million through a zero percent interest coupon bond

Appleby advises in a structured deal of USD 200 million 0.00 % convertible senior notes due 2028 (No...

Contributors: Karishma Beegoo
12 Nov 2020 | Deals

Appleby advises in a structured deal of USD 325 million

Appleby advises in a structured deal of USD 325 million 5.375 % secured notes due 2024.