In Mauritius, the Securities Act 2005 identifies the specific offences – insider dealing, false trading in securities, market rigging, fraud involving securities and false or misleading conduct. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Stock Exchange of Mauritius are embodied with certain powers which allow them to take actions against an individual and/or legal person. Most importantly, the Financial Services Act 2007 gives the FSC wide powers such as the power of interview, power of search or power to compel disclosure and power to obtain evidence.

For the purposes of investigation, the investigator, who is authorised by the Chief Executive of the FSC, has the power to:

enter any premises, at any reasonable time, used or has been used by the licensee for business purposes;

search for any document or any other thing that is incidental to the investigation and which is also relevant to the investigation;

administer oath, affirmation or declaration;

seize any document (including electronically stored information), article or other thing and/or object that is incidental or relevant to the investigation;

summon any licensee, or its officers, employees and associates, or any witness necessary for the conduct of the investigation.

After completing the investigation, the investigator must submit his report to the Chief Executive of the FSC and if, on application by the FSC, the court finds that a person has committed an act of insider dealing, the court may make an order requesting payment to the FSC of an amount to be determined by the court. The court may order a maximum amount which is equal to the amount found by the court to be the amount of profit that may have been realised or loss avoided by the offender because of the offence. The amount recovered goes into a compensation fund to compensate investors who suffered a loss by the insider dealing.

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
16 Aug 2019 |

Enforcement of Arbitral Awards

Before embarking into the enforcement of arbitral awards, it is important to distinguish between a d...

16 Aug 2019 |

Amalgamation and migration under Mauritius Law

At a time when emerging technologies such as blockchain, cryptocurrency and FinTech dominate the off...

16 Aug 2019 |

Mauritius to embrace Blockchain Technology

The adoption of blockchain will represent a total shift from the traditional business dealings in Ma...

16 Aug 2019 |

Mauritius Case-Law Summary

This is a summary of recent cases likely to influence the practice of global business in Mauritius.

16 Aug 2019 |

Restrictions on giving financial assistance

Financial assistance refers to the assistance given by a company, whether directors or indirectly, f...

Contributors: Farzanah Nawool
16 Aug 2019 |

Mauritius case summary: State Trading Corporation v Betamax Ltd

This case summary brings a new dimension to the approach of the highest court of the land on interna...

Contributors: Yahia Nazroo, Zahrah Juman
16 Aug 2019 |

The Lenders’ Choice: a pledge or a charge

A fundamental question that arises during secured debt financing transactions is which type of secur...

16 Aug 2019 |

Must we separate the roles of Chairman and CEO?

The role of the chairman is critical to good governance and to effective performance but the law doe...

19 Jul 2019 |

Mauritius Regulatory Update

This is the first in a series of of Mauritius Regulatory Alerts in which we bring you an overview of...

26 Jun 2019 |

Regulatory Headwinds

Faced with increased scrutiny from regulators on both global and jurisdictional levels, businesses m...

Contributors: David Dorgan