However, both the LCIA and the Mauritian Government remain firmly committed to promoting international arbitration both in and in relation to Africa, and look forward to being involved in its future growth. Over and above this mutual commitment, the Mauritian Government will pursue its ambition of maintaining Mauritius as a focal point for international arbitration in Africa as it has been for the past seven years.

From 28 July 2018, the MIAC will emerge as a fully operational and independent arbitration centre equipped with state-of-the art technology in order to administer international arbitrations and mediations using MIAC rules.

The LCIA-MIAC was designed to help the Mauritian Government establish Mauritius as an international arbitration hub for the African region with the LCIA’s support.

The MIAC Rules are based on the UNCITRAL Rules as well as on the Mauritian International Arbitration Act 2008 (IAA). The avowed aim of the Mauritian Government is to provide the international community with an international arbitral seat for Africa and beyond by bringing ‘the highest level of dispute resolution services to the international community, with a particular focus on disputes in and with relation to Africa’.

It is understood that the MIAC will be sustained by a 3-tier structure namely, the Government of Mauritius, an Advisory Board headed by Professor Emmanuel Gaillard and, a Secretariat which will stand advised by the Advisory Board. The MIAC will also derive support from the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) which has established presence in Mauritius. Thus, the MIAC Rules will refer matters dealing with arbitral appointments and challenges to the Secretary-General of the PCA in line with the IAA. As to the legal framework within which the MIAC will operate, it will be the IAA.

The discontinuance of the operations of the LCIA-MIAC in the Mauritian jurisdiction has a direct bearing on the Mauritian global business sector. In particular, this affects Mauritian companies licensed as Category 1 Global Business Licence (GBL1) companies. Indeed, since January 2015, one of the criteria that is looked at by the Financial Services Commission, as regulator of the Mauritian global business, to ascertain whether a GBL1 is administered and managed in Mauritius, is the inclusion of an arbitral clause in the constitution of these Mauritian companies to the effect that disputes arising out of the constitution of GBL1 companies shall be referred to arbitration under the IAA (section 5 IAA) (i.e. international arbitration).

In order to deal with arbitrations and mediations driven under the LCIA-MIAC, the LCIA will continue to administer such arbitrations and mediations that have already been concluded or are inadvertently concluded between now and 31 August 2018. However, it is the MIAC that will administer arbitrations and mediations that arise from agreements that inadvertently reference the LCIA-MIAC and that are concluded after 31 August 2018.

Admittedly, the withdrawal of a prestigious institution as the LCIA from the Mauritian jurisdiction will attract mixed views on the reasonableness of the Mauritian Government’s ambition to establish Mauritius as a hub for international arbitration within the African region because of the volatile nature of the global economy and the ferocious competition within the global village. However, it is to be remembered that 50 years through its independence, the Republic of Mauritius remains a young nation with the dynamics and stamina to weather through the challenges ahead of it. The success of the MIAC will no doubt play a key role towards this end.

Type

Insight

Locations

Mauritius

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
18 Nov 2022

APPLEBY MAURITIUS NEWSLETTER, NOVEMBER 2022

There have been interesting developments in our legal landscape since our last issue with the Govern...

17 Nov 2022

Mauritius Case-Law Summary November 2022

This is a summary of recent cases likely to influence the practice of global business in Mauritius.

17 Nov 2022

The Statutory Requirement for a Debenture Holders’ Representative in Mauritius

A debenture is essentially a debt instrument which is traditionally not supported by any collateral ...

Contributors: Abdal Aumeer
17 Nov 2022

Banker's duty of confidentiality

A bank’s duty of confidentiality to its customers, as well as the obligation on banking institutio...

Contributors: Zahrah Juman
27 Sep 2022

Similar but Different

While the basic features of the trust remain, there are some notable differences in how trusts can b...

9 Sep 2022

Attachment Orders – A useful debt enforcement tool for creditors

One of the unsettling questions that lingers in the minds of creditors is how to secure or recover t...

25 Jul 2022

APPLEBY MAURITIUS NEWSLETTER, JULY 2022

There have been interesting developments in our legal landscape since our last issue with the Govern...

22 Jul 2022

Digital Banking - Being future ready

One of the positive aspects of digitalisation is the opportunity which it has offered for financial ...

21 Jul 2022

Concurrence Déloyale

This article reviews the approach which the Mauritian Supreme Court adopts on the concept of “Conc...

21 Jul 2022

Case Summaries

The Supreme Court had to address a preliminary objection raised by co-respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 3 on...