The case in question centres upon the high-profile divorce case of Michael and Yasmin Prest and has been described by one of the appeal judges as “truly extraordinary”. Mr Prest, a Nigerian born oil tycoon based in Britain and founder of energy company Petrodel resources, separated from his wife of 15 years. In the subsequent divorce proceedings in the High Court, he sought to argue that Petrodel’s assets did not belong to him but were held on trust for his birth family because his father had provided the initial capital, or seed money, subject to that trust.

His evidence was found to be “deceitful and shambolic” and such manoeuvres were trenchantly dismissed. Mr Justice Moylan at first instance concluded that the whole structure was for Mr Prest’s benefit alone and in his control and he was able to change the structure and distribute the wealth within it as he wished; “Petrodel is Mr Prest and Mr Prest is Petrodel”. Drawing adverse inferences against Mr Prest, the judge concluded that he was worth £37.5 million and awarded his wife £17.5 million.

Relying upon the powers conferred by s.24(1)(a) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 which provides for the transfer or settlement property by one spouse to another to which the spouse is “entitled either in possession or reversion”, Mr Justice Moylan concluded that the “corporate structure was used as a repository for the family wealth” and therefore there existed “no legal impediment to his procuring the transfer of assets held by the companies in his name” as they were his “alter ego”.

A fundamental principle of company law confers a separate legal personality upon a corporate structure and considers its assets to belong beneficially to the company itself and not its shareholders…

Type

Insight

Locations

Jersey

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
2 Sep 2021 |

Duties of Trustees

The relationship of trustees to beneficiaries is viewed as fiduciary, meaning there are certain equi...

18 Aug 2021 |

Beneficial Owners and Controllers (BOC)

The aim of BOC is to drill-down to the identification of persons who are the beneficial owners and c...

30 Jul 2021 |

Fighting international fraud

First published in New Law Journal, July 2021. Appleby partners Anthony William and Jared Dann an...

Contributors: Jared Dann, Claire Corkish
27 Jul 2021 |

Fund Finance Update – Will Jersey’s new sustainable investment disclosure requirements aid ESG financing?

This article provides an overview of ESG, the hot topic of 2020 that is carrying on full steam throu...

Contributors: Daniel Healy
22 Jul 2021 |

Listing Variable Funding Notes (VFNs) on The International Stock Exchange

This article provides a summary of Appleby listing agent services in the Channel Islands, and also o...

1 Jul 2021 |

Saunders v Vautier where the beneficial class is not closed - the debate goes on...

The rule in Saunders v Vautier is familiar territory for trust lawyers.  In the modern world it is ...

17 Jun 2021 |

Solvency Statements under Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 - Is it time to go paperless?

In April of this year, the Royal Court of Jersey considered the practicalities around the making of ...

Contributors: Kevin McQuillan
11 Jun 2021 |

“Offshore intelligence – Funds in demand” Appleby Podcast

We have recently produced a podcast focused on the Funds industry entitled “Offshore Intelligence ...

2 Jun 2021 |

Why use Jersey entities in restructurings?

As the extension of various forbearance measures and fiscal support packages continues in response t...

Contributors: Gemma Whale, Andrew Weaver
28 May 2021 |

Further updates to the JFSC’s AML Handbook

On 31 May 2021, the handbook for the prevention and detection of money laundering and the financing ...

Contributors: Gemma Whale