HKEx released Consultation Conclusions on Reduction of Minimum Spreads and New Corporate Governance Code

Published: 19 Feb 2025
Type: Insight

In December 2024, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Exchange“) released two consultation conclusions (the “Consultation Conclusions“) following two consultation papers (the “Consultation Papers“) on the (i) Proposed Reduction of Minimum Spreads in the Hong Kong Securities Market; and (ii) the Review of the Corporate Governance Code and related Main Board and GEM Listing Rules aiming to (a) enhance market microstructure with a goal to improve market liquidity and global competitiveness of the Hong Kong market by facilitating bid-ask spread reduction and transaction costs savings; and (b) strike an appropriate balance between advancing good corporate governance practices in Hong Kong as an international financial centre and addressing the practical concerns of listed issuers.


Proposed Reduction of Minimum Spreads in the Hong Kong Securities Market

Feedback on the Consultation Papers demonstrate overall market support for the proposed minimum spreads reduction of the applicable securities in the Hong Kong securities market.

In phase 1, the minimum spreads of the price band between HKD10 and HKD20 of the applicable securities will be reduced from HKD0.02 to HKD0.01, and those between HKD20 and HKD50 will be reduced from HKD0.05 to HKD0.02. In phase 2, the minimum spread of the price band between HKD0.5 and HKD10 will be reduced by 50%.

Phase 1 is now planned for launch around mid-2025 to give adequate preparation time for the market. The implementation details including the relevant rule changes and implementation timetable will be announced in due course. Phase 2 will be implemented tentatively around mid-2026 if no undesirable impact is observed in the assessment of results from the phase 1 implementation, and subject to market readiness.

Review of Corporate Governance Code and Related Listing Rules

Sound corporate governance is considered by investors as an essential foundation for a business’s long-term success, particularly as markets become more dynamic, competitive and uncertain. The new measures reflect Exchange’s continued focus on improving board effectiveness and help to ensure that new and diverse experiences and perspectives are available in the boardroom, with the aim of improving issuers’ decision-making when tackling known and emerging challenges and opportunities. The new requirements will take effect on 1 July 2025, with transitional arrangements in place for certain amendments. The Exchange will publish updated guidance in the first half of 2025 to assist issuers in complying with the new requirements. Key amendments include:

Designation of lead independent non-executive director (“Lead INED”) – Issuers without an independent board chair should designate one INED as a Lead INED.

Director Training – Every director of the issuers must receive continuous professional development in each financial year of the issuers.

Board Performance Review – An issuer should conduct a formal evaluation of the board’s performance at least every two years.

Disclosure of Board Skills Matrix – An issuer should maintain and disclose in the corporate governance report a board skills matrix (which should include the existing board skills mix, how the skills, experience, and diversity of the board serve the company’s purpose, values, strategy and desired culture, and plans to acquire further skills).

INED Term Limit – The Exchange will not consider a director to be independent if the individual has been an INED of the issuer for a period of nine years or more.

Board and Workforce Diversity – Issuers should appoint at least one director of a different gender to the nomination committee. Separate disclosure of the gender ratio of senior management and the workforce.

Dividends – Issuers must have a policy on payment of dividends and should disclose it in the annual report.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
28 Oct 2025

Updates on Hong Kong’s Uncertificated Securities Market Regime from an offshore perspective

Hong Kong’s uncertificated securities market ("USM”) initiative is scheduled to take effect in 2026, subject to market readiness.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
21 Oct 2025

Redemption of Cayman shares in Chinese Red Chip corporate groups – latest developments and ideas for investors

This article provides an overview of the key legal issues facing preference shareholders in Cayman Islands companies when considering enforcing their redemption rights.

Appleby-Website-Structured-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
26 Sep 2025

Structured lending for hyperscale data center providers: offshore spvs powering securitisation driven capital solutions

The exponential growth of hyperscale data centers, driven by surging demand for cloud computing, artificial intelligence and digital infrastructure, is reshaping the way these assets are financed. As operators seek to scale rapidly, bank debt funding is moving towards capital markets solutions. Securitisation, particularly in Asia, is emerging as a strategic tool to monetise long-term lease receivables, with offshore SPVs playing a pivotal role in enabling cross-border capital flows.

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
25 Sep 2025

Typical Collateral Package in Cayman Fund Financing

The recovery of the Asian fund finance market over the past couple of years has reinforced the dominance of the Cayman Islands as the jurisdiction of choice for offshore fund structures.  The security package remains a key consideration for lenders in fund finance transactions.  This article provides an overview of the main types of collateral that lenders typically seek when lending to Cayman Islands fund vehicles under different types of facilities.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
21 Aug 2025

Hong Kong and Australian courts recognise principles of segregation in Cayman SPCs

In two recent judgments, Tjin Joen Joe, Andy Tsjoe Kong and another v Oakwise Value Fund SPC [2025] HKCFI 1281 (Oakwise Value Fund) and Cowan, in the matter of Coinful Capital Fund, SPC (in Official Liquidation) [2025] FCA 315 (Coinful Capital Fund), the High Court of Hong Kong and the Federal Court of Australia have recognised fundamental principles underpinning the Cayman Islands segregated portfolio companies (SPC) regime.

Dispute Resolution
28 Jun 2025

High Court of Hong Kong confirms arbitrability of shareholder claims for oppression and loss of confidence

In the recent decision in PI 1 & PI 2 v MR [2025] HKCFI 1110 (PI 1 & PI 2), the High Court of Hong Kong confirmed that certain factual and legal disputes are arbitrable, even where their determination may serve as a precursor to the winding up of a Cayman Islands company on just and equitable grounds. Notably, the High Court of Hong Kong has, for the first time, expressly adopted the reasoning of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (the JCPC) in FamilyMart China Holdings Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp [2023] UKPC 33; [2024] Bus LR 190 (FamilyMart).

Appleby-Website-Funds-and-Investment-Services
26 Jun 2025

Navigating CIMA Audit Requirements for a Cayman Regulated Fund

To maintain good standing with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA), a Cayman regulated mutual fund or a registered private fund must meet specific audit filing obligations. These requirements are critical for funds seeking to remain compliant or deregister. This article outlines a complete set of audit filing scenarios for Cayman regulated funds as well as its statutory audit filing requirements, including audit waivers, audit filing extensions, and audit period extensions. This article is to address some of the key issues facing fund operators in the operation, management and orderly winding up of the Cayman regulated funds when it comes to audit filings.

Corporate Finance
25 Jun 2025

The Rise of Panda Bonds: Enhancing International Investments in China's Bond Market from an Offshore Perspective

Panda bonds, initially launched in 2005, saw unprecedented popularity in recent years. This surge is likely driven by factors such as the divergence in the United States (“U.S.”) - China monetary policy and ongoing geopolitical tensions. Panda bonds - renminbi (“RMB”) denominated bonds issued within China's domestic bond market by entities domiciled outside of China - serve as a strategic financing tool. Issuers range from Chinese-owned companies incorporated in offshore financial centers with primary operations in China to international corporations, financial institutions and sovereign entities.

Structured Finance
18 Jun 2025

Achieving Bankruptcy Remoteness in Structured Finance

The structured finance market in the APAC region continues to grow in recent years, particular in the number of new issuances and the use of different financial products in complex structuring. Cayman special purpose vehicles (SPVs) are one of the most utilized offshore vehicles in the Asian structured finance industry, which is well supported by established legal and regulatory regimes. This article introduces a key feature of securitisation and repackaging, which is the ring-fencing of assets and removing them from the bankruptcy risks of the originator/seller of the assets – often referred to as bankruptcy remoteness. Investors of structured notes can simply take on the credit risks of the underlying asset, and the seller can achieve off-balance sheet treatment of the underlying asset.

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
10 Apr 2025

Cayman Court Grants Convening Order, Marking Key Step in Kaisa’s Recovery Plan

Distressed Chinese property developer Kaisa takes step forward in its recovery, as Cayman Courts continue to demonstrate the jurisdiction’s pro-active approach to cross-border restructurings. Though the Court’s approach to a scheme convening hearing is well-established, challenges from a small section of creditors remain a risk that cannot be ignored. What are the key factors in navigating the restructuring process, and what trends should we keep an eye on?