The ES Law requires certain entities incorporated or registered in the Cayman Islands and carrying on specified activities to have ‘adequate substance’ in the Cayman Islands. One of the specified activities that may be relevant to your business is “fund management business”.

The scope of this eAlert is limited to the application of the ES Law to fund management business.

Relevant Entities

The ES Law applies only to “relevant entities” meaning Cayman companies (other than domestic companies), Cayman limited liability companies, Cayman limited liability partnerships and foreign companies registered in Cayman, but excluding investment funds and entities that are tax resident outside of the Cayman Islands.

Fund Management Business

“Fund management business” is the business of managing securities belonging to another person in circumstances involving the exercise of discretion, carried on by a relevant entity licensed under the Cayman Islands Securities Investment Business Law (SIBL) for an investment fund.

Economic Substance Test

A relevant entity conducting fund management business is required to satisfy a 3-branch economic substance test in relation to such fund management business. It must:

1. conduct core income generating activity in the Cayman Islands which includes:

taking decisions on the holding and selling of investments;

calculating risk and reserves;

taking decisions on currency or interest fluctuations and hedging positions; or

preparing reports or returns, or both, to investors or the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, or both,

2. be directed and managed in an appropriate manner in the Cayman Islands which will require, among other things:

the board of directors, as a whole, to have the appropriate knowledge and expertise to discharge its duties as a board of directors;

meetings of the board of directors to be held in the Cayman Islands at adequate frequencies given the level of decision-making required;

the minutes of all meetings of the board of directors and appropriate records of the relevant entity to be kept in the Cayman Islands,

3. having regard to the level of relevant income derived from the relevant activity carried out in the Cayman Islands –

(i) have adequate operating expenditure incurred in the Cayman Islands;

(ii) have adequate physical presence (including maintaining a place of business or plant, property and equipment) in the Cayman Islands; and

(iii) have an adequate number of full-time employees or other personnel with appropriate qualifications in the Cayman Islands.

The satisfaction of the economic substance requirements will be a question of fact. There will not be a one-size-fits-all approach and much will depend on the size and scope of the business (both in the Cayman Islands and in other locations) and its expected gross income in the Cayman Islands.

Possible Expansion of Scope

Currently, the definition of “fund management business” covers only entities that are licensed under SIBL. However, amendments have been proposed to apply economic substance requirements to relevant entities that fall within the definition of, and are registered as, excluded persons under SIBL (Excluded Persons).

Any Excluded Person providing discretionary investment management services to investment funds will wish to monitor these developments closely. For now, we alert you to the proposed changes so that you may prepare for the future and make provisions within your business plan to ensure compliance with the law if and when these proposals become law.

Next Steps

All relevant entities conducting fund management business will need to undertake an internal review to determine what measures, if any, they might need to take in order to achieve compliance. If you would like further guidance on how these requirements will impact your business, please reach out to your usual Appleby contact.

Locations

Cayman Islands

Services

Corporate

Sectors

Economic Substance

Type

Insight

Share
X.com LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
31 Oct 2025

Cayman Islands Court Considers Scope Of Powers To Be Sought In Letter Of Request

Cayman Islands liquidators regularly seek recognition of their appointment in Hong Kong, and rely on...

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
28 Oct 2025

Updates on Hong Kong’s Uncertificated Securities Market Regime from an offshore perspective

Hong Kong’s uncertificated securities market ("USM”) initiative is scheduled to take effect in 2...

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
21 Oct 2025

Redemption of Cayman shares in Chinese Red Chip corporate groups – latest developments and ideas for investors

This article provides an overview of the key legal issues facing preference shareholders in Cayman I...

Appleby-Website-Structured-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
26 Sep 2025

Structured lending for hyperscale data center providers: offshore spvs powering securitisation driven capital solutions

The exponential growth of hyperscale data centers, driven by surging demand for cloud computing, art...

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
25 Sep 2025

Typical Collateral Package in Cayman Fund Financing

The recovery of the Asian fund finance market over the past couple of years has reinforced the domin...

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
4 Sep 2025

Send in the Troops? Proportionality, notice and the appointment of joint provisional liquidators in the Cayman Islands

A recent Judgment of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands offers a valuable reminder to aggrieved s...

Appleby-Website-Residential-Property-Caribbean
1 Sep 2025

A Guide to Transferring Shares in a Local Company

The Cayman Islands has a well-established legal framework for companies carrying on local business.�...

Appleby-Website-Dispute-Resolution-Practice
21 Aug 2025

Hong Kong and Australian courts recognise principles of segregation in Cayman SPCs

In two recent judgments, Tjin Joen Joe, Andy Tsjoe Kong and another v Oakwise Value Fund SPC [2025] ...

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
12 Aug 2025

Tempering the wind to the shorn lamb (Case Note): Stevens v Hotel Portfolio II UK Limited [2025] UKSC 28

Marcus Staff  verifies that trusts imposed by law aren’t wagging the voluntary trust dog  by cro...