Changes to the Employment Act 2000 – Part 4

Published: 25 Mar 2021
Type: Insight

First Published in The Bermuda Chamber Of Commerce Newsletter (Chamber Insider), April 2021

This Article is Part 4 of our series on the amendments to the Employment Act 2000 (“Act”) that will be coming into effect on 1 June 2021. This article examines the introduction of a requirement for employers to inform and consult with employees regarding redundancies and lay-offs.

Information and consultation requirements

Under section 30 of the Act, an employer is permitted to terminate the employment of an employee whose position is redundant. Section 30(3) sets out the various conditions which, if they directly result in a reduction in the employer’s work force, will amount to a “redundancy” for these purposes (for example, the discontinuance of all or part of the employer’s business). Notice must be given in accordance with the employee’s contract and the statutory minimum notice requirements under section 20, and the employee will be entitled to a severance allowance.

From 1 June 2021, section 30 will be amended to require an employer to provide the following information to an employee before making them redundant:

  • “the existence of the relevant condition of redundancy”;
  • “the reasons for the termination contemplated”;
  • “the number and categories of employees likely to be affected”; and
  • “the period over which such termination is likely to be carried out”,

(the “Statutory Information”).

In summary, the employer should as a minimum identify the circumstances which meet the definition of “redundancy” under section 30(3), explain why these circumstances have led to the proposal to reduce headcount, and provide details of the employees affected by the proposal and the date(s) on which the terminations are expected to take effect, if confirmed.

From 1 June 2021, the employer will also be required to “consult” with employees on the following matters:

  • “the possible measures that could be taken to avert or minimise the adverse effects of such redundancy on employment”; and
  • “the possible measures that could be taken to mitigate the adverse effects of any termination on the employees concerned”,

(the “Consultation Matters”).

Topics to be covered should include alternatives to making compulsory redundancies, such as a reduction in hours or job-sharing, as well as the availability of any suitable alternative vacancies in the employer’s organisation that the employee could be offered.

At present, employers are only required to inform and consult with the employee’s trade union or other representative, if they have one (although, as good practice, many employers will already go through at least an informal consultation process with an employee before making them redundant). Further, the law currently provides that employers must take these steps “as soon as practicable”, but from 1 June 2021 the information and consultation requirements must be carried out “not less than 14 days” before giving notice of termination.

This is the first time that employers will be under a legal obligation to inform and consult directly with employees on redundancies. Failure to follow the new requirements could have serious consequences: the employee’s termination could be unlawful, meaning that they may be able to bring a claim for reinstatement or re-engagement, or compensation for unfair dismissal.

Redundancy process

To ensure compliance with the new statutory obligations and with best practice, we suggest that employers follow a redundancy process which includes at least the following steps:

  • An initial meeting at which the affected employee(s) are informed that they are ‘at risk’ of redundancy. The Statutory Information can be given at this meeting and/or confirmed in writing thereafter;
  • A fair redundancy selection process should then be conducted, if required;
  • Employees identified for redundancy should then be invited to a formal consultation meeting, during which the Consultation Matters should be discussed. Further consultation meetings may be necessary if issues arise at the first meeting which require further investigation or consideration.

Once the consultation process has concluded, and assuming no alternative to redundancy has been identified, the employer can proceed to give notice of termination. Each of the steps above will need to be taken at least 14 days before notice is given.

Lay offs

Under section 32 of the Act, where any of the conditions of redundancy exist an employer may lay off an employee for a continuous period not exceeding four months.

Currently, there are no specific information or consultation requirements that employers must comply with in order to implement lay offs. From 1 June 2021, employers will be subject to a new obligation to provide the following information to the employee, and their trade union or other representative (if any), as soon as practicable:

  • “the existence of the relevant condition of redundancy”;
  • “the reasons for the lay off contemplated”; and
  • “the period over which such lay off is likely to be carried out”.

The origins of this new requirement can likely be traced to the increased focus on the lay off provisions in the Act during 2020, when the impact of the covid-19 pandemic resulted in a significant number of lay offs. This new requirement will increase protection and transparency for employees who are laid off in future.

Summary

The new requirements discussed in this article will involve a significant change to many employers’ current HR practices and will substantially increase legal protections for employees, and risks for employers, in the context of workforce reductions.

Anyone with any questions concerning how these amendments may impact their business can contact a member of our Employment and Immigration Practice: Bradley Houlston ([email protected]) or Jordan Knight ([email protected]).

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
9 Oct 2026

Supervision Rules for Internationally Active Insurance Groups being proposed by BMA

The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) intends to implement new rules under a new Insurance (Internationally Active Group Supervision) Rules 2026 (Proposed Rules) to align Bermuda’s regulatory framework with international standards for Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs) set by the IAIS (of which Bermuda is a member).

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
2 Oct 2026

Police certificates become part of BMA vetting

Businesses seeking regulatory approval for directors, owners and senior personnel now need to account for an additional documentary requirement.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Oct 2026

Commingling of Risks: The New Flavour of the Cat Bond Market

As catastrophe bond sponsors grow more confident with the asset class, companies are increasingly combining different peril structures within individual transactions, all of which leads Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby, to say that this commingling of risks is becoming the new flavour of the cat bond market.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
22 Sep 2026

BMA Sets Out Phased Path to a Bermuda Insurance Resolution Regime

The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) has proposed a framework for resolving failing (re)insurers. Boards and executive teams should take note and, where appropriate, take part in the consultation, which closes on 15 December 2026.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
14 Sep 2026

Navigating BMA’s proposed AI guidance note

Now that the Bermuda Monetary Authority has shifted its focus from general principles about artificial intelligence to a concrete, actionable regulatory framework, board and executive teams of financial service companies must take note and decide whether to become involved in the consultative process.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
10 Sep 2026

AI in the Workplace: Emerging Legal Issues for Bermuda Employers

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming part of the modern workplace. It has moved quickly from being an experimental technology to an everyday business tool. Employers are already using AI to draft job advertisements, screen applications, assess candidates, analyse employee performance, monitor productivity and assist with disciplinary and termination decisions. For employers, the attraction is obvious. AI can process large quantities of information quickly, identify patterns and perform tasks that previously required significant human resources. But such widespread application of AI is also giving rise to legal risk as regulators and courts around the world consider what happens when an employment decision is made, or materially influenced, by an algorithm. It is a question that is likely to become increasingly relevant in Bermuda, as the law necessarily catches up with the technology.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 Sep 2026

Capital rich, softening rates, big opportunity: the growth dilemma

After several years of healthy profits, despite some softening, the reinsurance market remains in good shape – if discipline remains. Meanwhile, new and complex risks are emerging, including data centres, offering big opportunities for growth for those willing to take it on. They were some of the takeaways from 10 senior executives from the Bermuda market who met at a roundtable in Monte Carlo.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 Sep 2026

A refusal to stand still

Anchored by regulatory credibility and an unmatched marketplace, Bermuda continues to widen its offering with capital adaptability and innovation, says Brad Adderley, of Appleby.

Appleby-Website-Funds-and-Investment-Services
27 Aug 2026

Late-stage liquidity and the Bermuda fund toolkit

Private-market liquidity once followed an exit. Today, however, it must often be engineered. That matters in Bermuda, where asset management is not only a substantial sector in its own right, but also complemented by Bermuda’s re/insurance and insurance-linked securities market.

Corporate
13 Aug 2026

The limited liability company: ten years on

Nearly a decade after they were first introduced in Bermuda, parties have started to appreciate the benefits offered by limited liability companies — and consequently we have begun to see LLCs used with increasing frequency.