Cayman Islands’ Limited Liability Companies Law, 2016, comes into force

Published: 11 Jul 2016
Type: Insight

The Limited Liability Companies Law, 2016 (Law) came into force on 8 July 2016, making the Cayman Islands limited liability company (LLC) available for the first time in the jurisdiction.


The introduction of the LLC responds to requests made by the US financial services industry for such a vehicle. As a result, the Law in the Cayman Islands reflects many key features of Delaware’s Limited Liability Company Act and those familiar with that Act will recognise features with certain modifications to conform with Cayman Islands law and concepts.

What is a limited liability company?

Essentially, the LLC is a hybrid entity, merging certain characteristics of a Cayman Islands exempted company with those of a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership.

Within the parameters of the Law and other Cayman Islands laws applicable to LLCs, members of an LLC are free to agree on regulations governing management of the LLC, contributions by members and distributions and conduct between themselves pursuant to an LLC agreement. Express provisions of the Law create priority in respect of security interests granted by members in respect of their LLC interests. Members owe no duty (fiduciary or otherwise) to the LLC or its members (except if a member also acts as a manager of the LLC, in which case the Law imposes a duty of good faith in exercising the rights and authorities and obligations of a manager, subject to any higher duty that may be imposed under the LLC agreement).

Key features of a Cayman Islands limited liability company (LLC)

  1. An LLC is a body corporate with separate legal personality and limited liability, like a Cayman exempted company, but without having share capital.
  2. The registration of an LLC is simple, requiring the filing of a registration statement and payment of the appropriate fee (the proposed name of the LLC should be checked in advance with the Registrar of Limited Liability Companies (Registrar)).
  3. The affairs of an LLC are not governed by memorandum and articles of association, but by its operating agreement (LLC Agreement) which must be governed by Cayman Islands law (and which is not required to be filed with the Registrar). As the Limited Liability Companies Law, 2016 (Law) in many instances defers to the LLC Agreement, members of an LLC have increased flexibility in deciding on their LLC’s structure and the provisions under which it is to be governed.
  4. Members of an LLC may have capital accounts and make capital contributions, with profits and losses allocated amongst those members as provided in the LLC Agreement.
  5. Management of an LLC shall either vest in its members acting by a majority in number or, if the LLC Agreement so provides, by one or more managers appointed by the members. The LLC Agreement may provide for classes of managers having such rights, powers and duties for the relevant class as specified in that agreement.
  6. Subject to the provisions of the LLC Agreement, a manager shall not owe a duty (fiduciary or otherwise) to the LLC or any member or any person except a duty to act in good faith (and such duty of good faith may be expanded or restricted by the express provisions of the LLC Agreement).
  7. As is the case with an exempted company, an LLC may not carry on business with the public in the Cayman Islands, except in furtherance of its business carried on outside the Cayman Islands and it may not make any invitation to the public in the Cayman Islands to subscribe for any securities of the LLC except if it is listed on the Cayman Stock Exchange.
  8. An LLC may apply for a 50-year tax undertaking certificate from the Cayman Islands Government.
  9. An LLC is required to maintain a register of members, a register of security interests (in respect of LLC interests), a register of managers and a register of mortgages and charges. Only the register of managers is required to be filed with the Registrar, but it will not be available for public inspection.
  10. An exempted company that is not a segregated portfolio company may convert into an LLC.
  11. An LLC may merge or consolidate with one or more LLCs, exempted companies (provided they are not segregated portfolio companies) and foreign entities having separate legal personality.
  12. Foreign entities having separate legal personality are permitted to transfer by way of continuation into the Cayman Islands as LLCs (and LLCs are permitted to transfer by way of continuation out of the Cayman Islands as foreign entities).

Uses of a limited liability company

The LLC provides a significant alternative structuring option to complement the existing choice of vehicles in the Cayman Islands. We believe our clients will embrace the LLC as the suitable form of business vehicle in certain circumstances; it can be useful in a variety of areas including the structuring of investment funds (especially where the structure already includes one or more limited liability companies registered elsewhere), general corporate transactions requiring joint venture or special purpose vehicles and venture capital, private wealth and private equity structures.

It should be noted that the Law automatically incorporates the LLC into certain existing legislation to allow for its use as a mutual fund, general partner of an exempted limited partnership and as an investment manager or advisor.

Appleby is already advising on continuations of foreign entities into the Cayman Islands as LLCs and the content of proposed LLC agreements.

The Law is the natural outcome of the Cayman Islands paying attention and responding to the input and needs of global industry and its participants and further consolidates the Cayman Islands’ position as a leading offshore jurisdiction.

Share
More publications
The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
28 Apr 2026

The Interplay Between Supervision Applications and Winding Up on the Just and Equitable Ground: Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC

In its recent judgment in Re Atlas Capital Markets LLC [2026] CIGC (FSD) 19, the Grand Court considered itself bound to make a supervision order pursuant to s.131(b) of the Companies Act, notwithstanding that the company was the subject of a pending just and equitable winding up (J&E) petition when its voluntary liquidation was commenced; and rejected an attack on the joint voluntary liquidators’ (JVLs) independence, which was principally based on a misreading of the JVLs’ evidence and lacked any objective foundation. The authors, who successfully represented the JVLs in obtaining the supervision order, discuss this important judgment further below – which is believed to be the first decision on the interplay between supervision applications and J&E proceedings under the Companies Act – and offer their views on the guidance that shareholders petitioning on the just and equitable ground may derive from it in future cases.  The challenge to the JVLs’ independence was rejected on the well-established principles which Doyle J discussed in Re Global Fidelity Bank [2021] 2 CILR 361, and is not discussed in further detail below.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
23 Apr 2026

ReConnect 2026: Practical takeaways for Reinsurers, Cedants and Investors doing business in the Cayman Islands

The Cayman International Reinsurance Commercial Association (CIRCA) held its annual conference, [Re]Connect, last week at the Ritz-Carlton, Grand Cayman. This year’s [Re]Connect has once again demonstrated Cayman’s growing influence in global reinsurance and the strength of the jurisdiction’s regulatory, professional and commercial ecosystem. The event brought together 675 registered delegates, including reinsurers, cedants, major US law firms, audit firms, tax practices, asset managers, overseas regulators, industry leaders and rating agencies – as well as Appleby Cayman’s [Re]Insurance Team, with Miriam Smyth, Regulatory Counsel, speaking on a panel of experts on structuring, licensing and operating a Cayman insurer.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
23 Apr 2026

FamilyMart and Beyond: The Continuing Influence of the Privy Council’s Landmark Decision on Shareholder Litigation

The Privy Council's decision in FamilyMart China Holding Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp [2023] UKPC 33 is a landmark ruling that distinguishes the arbitrability of underlying shareholder disputes from the court's exclusive jurisdiction over just and equitable winding-up of a Cayman company.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Prospects of Asian Companies in U.S. Listings in 2026

Nasdaq introduced a series of rule changes in 2025 to raise minimum requirements for public float and offering size for certain new listings.

Website-Code-Cayman
20 Apr 2026

Avoiding The Nuclear Option: Buyout Orders In Just And Equitable Winding Up Proceedings

With the Cayman Islands being a preferred jurisdiction for the incorporation of investment vehicles, inevitably cases will arise where non-controlling shareholders complain that they are being unfairly prejudiced by conduct of those in control, and necessarily pursue those complaints by way of proceedings to wind up the subject company on the just and equitable ground. Where such complaints are well-founded, the outcome will often be an order putting the subject company into official liquidation.  But the Cayman courts also have the jurisdiction in such cases to make a range of other orders as alternatives to taking that nuclear option, and are indeed obliged to consider whether any of those alternative orders would provide a more appropriate solution to the complaints.[1] The Grand Court was recently required to conduct that analysis in the case of Re Position Mobile Ltd SEZC.[2]  The petitioning shareholder in that case had satisfied the Court that it would be just and equitable to wind up the company – since it had justifiably lost confidence in the probity of those in control, due to their serious and sustained misconduct and mismanagement – but positively sought a buyout order[3] as an alternative to a winding up.  The Court thus proceeded to consider whether the buyout order, or any other alternative order, would be more appropriate than ordering a winding up, and concluded that a buyout order was the fairest and most appropriate form of relief in the circumstances of that case. The authors will discuss the guidance which the Position Mobile case provides in that regard below, which should be considered together with the guidance provided by Re Madera Technology Fund (CI) Ltd,[4] particularly in respect of the approach that the Cayman courts can be expected to take when setting the appropriate valuation date for a buyout order, with a view to ensuring that the valuation is fair to each side.[5] [1] See Re Virginia Solution SPC Ltd (unrep. 28 July 2023, CICA) at [61]. [2] [2026] CIGC (FSD) 10 [3] Requiring the respondent shareholders to purchase its shares at a fair price. [4] (unrep. 21 Aug. 2024, Richards J). [5] For further detail, see the authors’ article on the Madera Technology case at https://www.applebyglobal.com/publications/no-looking-back-investor-held-to-buyout-at-current-value-of-shares/.

The Exception To The Rule: Stricter Test Applies Where Granting An Interlocutory Injunction Would Shut Out Trial
7 Apr 2026

No Claim, No Injunction: What Does a Limited Partner Actually Own?

What equitable proprietary interest, if any, does a limited partner hold in the assets of a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership, and is that interest is sufficient to ground a proprietary injunction? These questions lie at the heart of Parker J’s recent judgment in the matter of Charitable DAF HoldCo, Ltd (in Official Liquidation), in which the Grand Court refused proprietary injunctive relief sought by joint official liquidators against former directors and associated entities. The judgment holds that the Company, as a limited partner in a Cayman ELP, had no equitable proprietary interest in the Fund’s underlying assets of the quality required to found the relief sought. While the court did not exclude the possibility of an LP having proprietary rights in an ELP’s assets, it held that on the particular facts of the case such rights were excluded.

Appleby-Website-Cayman2
30 Mar 2026

The Regulation of Cayman Islands Tokenised Funds – Clear Rules Now in Place

On 5 March 2026 the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment Bill), 2026, the Mutual Funds (Amendment) Bill, 2026 and the Private Funds (Amendment) Bill, 2026 were passed by the Parliament of the Cayman Islands with unanimous support, providing welcome clarity that Cayman Islands tokenised funds are regulated within Cayman’s existing Mutual Funds Act (MFA) and Private Funds Act (PFA) framework and do not fall within the scope of the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act (VASPA).

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
19 Mar 2026

Key Regulatory Requirements of SIBA Registered Persons in the Cayman Islands

Registered Persons under the Securities Investment Business Act (Revised) (SIBA) attract regulatory requirements including annual reporting requirements with key filing deadlines falling in January and, typically, December each year. The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (CIMA)’s recently issued General Industry Notice to the effect that all SIBA Registered Persons will be additionally required to submit a Prudential Information Survey for the 2025 calendar year (by 31 March 2026) has signaled CIMA's continued focus on enhancing the resilience, transparency and prudential soundness of the securities investment business (SIB) sector in the Cayman Islands. Accordingly, this briefing reviews some of the other key regulatory and reporting obligations that attach to Registered Persons under SIBA, CIMA’s associated Rules and Statements of Guidance (SOG), the applicable Anti-Money Laundering Regulations (Cayman AML Regulations) the Tax Information Authority (International Tax Compliance) (Common Reporting Standard) Regulations (Revised) (Cayman CRS Regulations) and, where applicable, The International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Act (Revised) (ES Act).