But what about transparency in commercial transactions such as property sales? If I buy a house from you, should I expect full disclosure from you? You might instinctively say yes, but should I be expected to assume potentially onerous legal liability by not disclosing a defect which you subsequently discover? And would you be quite so ready to say yes if the tables were turned and you were the seller?

Jersey law and practice traditionally sided with the seller, with ‘caveat emptor’ the guiding principle. It was for the buyer to make their own investigations and little if any information was required to be provided by the seller to the buyer.

However, recent years witnessed a shift in approach, with buyers’ lawyers developing ever more lengthy sets of questions to be answered by sellers’ lawyers. Some of the questions were undoubtedly sensible and hard to object to. But others were much more controversial, requiring for example the seller to confirm that services and equipment in the property were ‘fit for purpose’, a can of worms if ever there were one. Indeed, some frequently asked questions were impossible to answer, such as the request for confirmation that the property contained no legally protected animals or birds – all wild birds in Jersey are protected apart from carrion crows, magpies, feral pigeons and wood pigeons!

Not only was some of the content of the questions problematic, but there was no consistency of approach between law firms as to who asked which particular question. Furthermore, the legal status of the answers given was unclear: how did they interact with the conveyance, with its clause under which the buyer took the property with all its defects whether hidden or apparent; what would be the legal remedy for the buyer if an answer given by the seller proved to be incorrect; for how long would the seller remain on the hook?

This uncertain and rather chaotic state of affairs was the background to the development by the Law Society of Jersey last year of the Standard Seller Questionnaire (SSQ). Drafted by the Law Society’s Conveyancing Sub-Committee, on which all the major conveyancing firms are represented, the SSQ was introduced initially on an optional basis and then, after a few months’ road testing, it became mandatory. The aim of the SSQ is to strike a fair balance between the interests of sellers and buyers, focusing on factual questions which sellers can reasonably be expected to answer. It is written so far as possible in plain English and contains clear instructions to both parties as to their entitlements and responsibilities. Experience suggests that most sellers find it straightforward to complete.

Of course, opinions will differ as to where the balance should lie between the seller and the buyer when it comes to the disclosure of information. And indeed the consensus in five or ten years’ time as to what is a fair compromise may be very different to today’s consensus. However, the important thing is that there is now a framework which can be adapted as needed to reflect any such changes. Buyers and sellers of property will always have divergent interests, and different perceptions of where the limits of transparency should be drawn, but the advent of the SSQ has brought much needed compromise and clarity to the information disclosure exercise.

Share
X.com LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
13 Feb 2025

Recent developments in the attitude of the Jersey courts to onshore tax

Our experts throw the spotlight on the attitude of the Jersey courts to onshore taxes in the context...

Fund Finance
4 Feb 2025

Fund Finance Laws and Regulations – Jersey

The Appleby Jersey team provides comprehensive insight into legal trends and developments in the fun...

Appleby-Website-Listing-Services
31 Jan 2025

Capital Markets in Jersey: Regulatory Overview

Our Appleby Jersey use this Q&A to give an overviewof the main equity and debt market/exchanges and ...

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
23 Jan 2025

Personal liability for 'playing fast and loose' with the rules for wrongful trading in Jersey

Following the Royal Court of Jersey's first wrongful trading order, our experts give their insight.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
20 Jan 2025

A Golden New Year for natural resources in the Channel Islands

Our expert considers why Jersey and Guernsey are attractive jurisdictions for natural resource compa...

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
20 Nov 2024

Jersey to significantly increase compensation in employment cases

Following recommendations from the Employment Forum, the States of Jersey has now published the draf...

The Global Website header
7 Oct 2024

The Global – your offshore corporate law questions answered: October 2024

The Global is a quarterly collection of corporate expert insights and analysis across Appleby's glob...

Appleby-Website-Insolvency-and-Restructuring
1 Oct 2024

Jersey’s insolvency regime continues to develop

Our Jersey expert looks at the significant developments of the legislative framework applicable to i...

Corporate
4 Sep 2024

Types of Debt Securities listed on TISE in 2024

Find out more about The International Stock Exchange (TISE) as a leading European venue for listing ...

Regulatory Advice
30 Jul 2024

What comes after MONEYVAL?

Appleby Jersey recently welcomed MONEYVAL’s recognition of Jersey as a responsible finance centre ...