Under s192 of the Isle of Man Companies Act 1931, a Committee of Inspection shall consist of both creditors and contributories in such proportions as may be agreed by the meetings of creditors and contributories. Under this section, if there is a difference between the determinations of the meetings of the creditors and contributories, the court shall make a determination as to the Committee’s constitution as it thinks fit.

The purpose of the Committee of Inspection is to supervise the liquidation and to fix the remuneration of the liquidator. Ordinarily, and in accordance with its supervisory function, the liquidator will therefore consult with the Committee of Inspection before making key decisions, particularly on potentially controversial issues or in relation to litigation which may affect the recovery for the general body of unsecured creditors (such as the decision whether or not to take legal action to recover assets).

The analogous position in England & Wales is different to the Isle of Man in that contributories no longer ordinarily sit on the equivalent of the Committee of Inspection, which is now known as a “Liquidation Committee” under the Insolvency Act 1986. In this regard, whilst in a compulsory liquidation both the creditors and the contributories will be invited to establish and appoint the creditor members of the committee (although the creditors choice will prevail), it is only creditors who have proved for their debts and which haven’t been disallowed for voting or distribution or dividend purposes, that will be allowed to sit on the Liquidation Committee under the Insolvency Act 1986. The only exceptions to this are where the company in question is being wound-up on grounds other than on the inability to pay its debts or where creditors have decided against establishing a Liquidation Committee.

The recent change in position in England & Wales acknowledges the fact that Committees of Inspection are there for the benefit of the general body of unsecured creditors, and not for the benefit of contributories who ordinarily would have little interest in the recovery of assets for distribution to the general body of unsecured creditors, but who may instead be interested in sitting on the Committee of Inspection for an ulterior motive, such as to prevent investigation of wrongdoing and the pursuing of litigation to recover assets.

In the factual circumstances of this case the Applicants argued that it was inappropriate for the sole contributory to sit on the Committee of Inspection alongside the proved creditors in the liquidation. The Court agreed and made an order that the Committee of Inspection shall consist of the two proved creditors who are both respectively owed multi-million dollar debts from Global Steel Holdings Limited.

The judgment confirmed that in cases where a company is hopelessly insolvent and there is no prospect of a surplus being recovered in the liquidation, it would generally be inappropriate or serve no purpose for a contributory to sit on the Committee of Inspection. The judgment went further to confirm that, if there are other particular valid reasons or justifications for seeking to exclude a contributory, the court has the discretionary power to order that a contributory is excluded dependent on the facts of the case.

Caren Pegg and Mark Emery acted for the successful Applicants (Moorgate Industries UK Limited and the State Trading Corporation of India) being the only two proved creditors in the liquidation to date.

The full reported judgment can be accessed here.

Share
Twitter LinkedIn Email Save as PDF
More Publications
19 Mar 2024

Guernsey retains its EU adequacy – as expected

The post-Brexit regulatory landscape continues to throw up challenges and jurisdictional arbitrage, ...

26 Feb 2024

Trusts: Non-intervention in the Isle of Man

The recent Isle of Man judgment of the Staff of Government Division (SGD) in the case of A and B v C...

4 Dec 2023

Isle of Man Trusts and Trustees Act 2023 Update

The much anticipated Trusts and Trustees Act 2023 received Royal Assent on the 18 July 2023, bringin...

18 Jul 2023

The 2023 Guide to Fintech for the Isle of Man

Appleby has provided the Isle of Man chapter to the ICLG Fintech 2023. The “International Comparat...

20 Mar 2023

Trusts: Comparison between the Crown Dependencies

Our Private Client and Trusts specialists in Guernsey, Isle of Man and Jersey outline some of the ke...

19 Jan 2023

The Edinburgh Reforms: An Offshore Perspective

On 9 December 2022, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer announced a package of reforms to the UK fina...

15 Nov 2022

Insurance and reinsurance in the Isle of Man: Overview

A Q&A guide to insurance and reinsurance in the Isle of Man. Reproduced from Practical Law with the ...

3 Nov 2022

Significant Judgment for Isle of Man Fund Managers

A rethink of exclusion clauses in fund agreements may be needed after the Isle of Man’s appeal cou...

25 Oct 2022

An update to Isle of Man Trust Law

In the week that the Trust and Trustees Bill 2022 goes for its second reading (25 October 2022), it ...

27 Sep 2022

Similar but Different

While the basic features of the trust remain, there are some notable differences in how trusts can b...