When a disability affects performance

Published: 1 May 2019
Type: Insight

First Published in The Bermuda Chamber Of Commerce Newsletter (Chamber Insider) May 2019

What duties does an employer have when an employee develops a disability which prevents him from performing his employment duties, either completely or partially?

This is effectively a performance issue. However, the employer is under an obligation to consider whether any reasonable adjustments can be made to assist the employee with returning to work. Otherwise, the employer may be in breach of the Human Rights Act 1981 (Human Rights Act).

It is a breach of the Human Rights Act to discriminate against an individual because of a disability. However, the Human Rights Act also provides that nothing in that Act confers upon any person any right of employment or any right to be given, or to be retained in, any employment for which he is not qualified or which he is not able to perform or of which he is unable to fulfil a bona fide occupational requirement, or any right to be trained, promoted, considered or otherwise howsoever treated in or in relation to employment if his qualifications or abilities do not warrant such training, promotion, consideration or treatment.

The obligation to consider reasonable adjustments is set out in section 9C of the Human Rights Act, which provides that a disabled person shall not be considered disqualified for employment by reason of his disability if it is possible for the employer, or prospective employer, to modify the circumstances of the employment so as to eliminate the effects of the disabled person’s disability in relation to the employment, without causing unreasonable hardship to the employer or prospective employer.

For the purposes of this section “unreasonable hardship” arises in circumstances where (a) modification of a disabled person’s employment or prospective employment to eliminate or reduce the effects of the disabled person’s disability would be unreasonably costly, disruptive, or extensive; or (b) making such a modification would unreasonably alter the nature or operation of the employer’s business.

The unreasonableness of a modification will be determined on a case-by-case basis taking into account certain statutory factors which in summary include (i) the overall size of the employer’s work place; (ii) financial implications, concerning the employer’s workplace; and (iii) the impact on safety, concerning the employer’s workplace.

It is recommended that in considering any reasonable adjustments that a medical opinion is obtained.

In the event that there are no reasonable adjustments which can be made to assist the employee with returning to work, the employee may be dismissed by reason of their inability to perform their employment duties.

This note is intended as a high level overview of this topic and there may be a number of other issues which will also require consideration. Legal advice should always be sought on a case by case basis.

locations

Bermuda

services

Dispute Resolution

types

Insight

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Jun 2026

The Cost of Getting Employee Departures Wrong: Five Common Pitfalls for Bermuda Employers

Employee departures are an inevitable part of running a business, but the way they are managed can have significant legal, financial and operational consequences. In Bermuda, employers who approach terminations without adequate preparation may expose themselves to unnecessary disputes, regulatory issues, and reputational harm. Whether an employee is being dismissed for performance reasons, made redundant or departing as part of a negotiated exit, by recognizing the following common mistakes and taking a proactive approach, organizations can manage departures more effectively and reduce risk.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
8 Jun 2026

It’s time to bridge Pipa compliance gap

A review of 200 publicly available privacy notices of companies in Bermuda has revealed that just one in nine are fully compliant with the Personal Information Protection Act 2016.

Appleby-Website-Privacy-and-Data-Protection
26 May 2026

Transparency is a legal requirement under Pipa

Major companies across the European Union have faced substantial fines between 2019 and 2024, estimated at a total of €930 million (about $1.08 billion), not only for cyberattacks or data breaches, but also for issues such as noncompliant privacy notices. A common theme in many cases has been a lack of transparency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 May 2026

Outsourcing considerations for Bermuda insurers

As Bermuda insurers engage with third-party service providers to support their business functions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has clarified its regulatory expectations surrounding outsourcing arrangements and operational resilience.

Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.