Termination for Extended Sick Leave

Published: 26 Mar 2018
Type: Insight

First published in the Bermuda Chamber of Commerce, Insider Newsletter, April 2018 edition

When and how can an employer terminate an employee due to a long-term absence? To avoid being on the receiving end of an unfair dismissal claim, employers must ensure that a proper assessment has been made of (i) the reason for termination and (ii) the procedure in deciding whether or not to dismiss.

When and how can an employer terminate an employee due to a long-term absence? To avoid being on the receiving end of an unfair dismissal claim, employers must ensure that a proper assessment has been made of (i) the reason for termination and (ii) the procedure in deciding whether or not to dismiss.

Pursuant to the Employment Act 2000, a valid reason for termination is one connected with, inter alia, the ability, performance or conduct of the employee. A temporary absence due to sickness or injury is not a valid reason unless it is frequent and/or the employee exceeds their allocated leave entitlement. Further, it is not enough to show that there is a valid reason. The employer must also ensure that a proper investigation and termination procedure is followed.

Generally, a fair procedure involves consulting with the employee, establishing the employee’s medical position and considering reasonable accommodations or the availability of alternative employment. If the employee consents, a medical opinion should be obtained which will allow the employer to ascertain the nature of the employee’s illness, the likely length of absence, and whether the employee is suffering from a disability. The onus is on the employer to take reasonable steps to ascertain the employee’s medical position but the employer cannot compel an employee to share medical reports. If the employee refuses to cooperate then they risk decisions being made without the benefit of medical evidence.

If it is established that the employee is suffering from a disability, the employer is under a duty to make reasonable adjustments so that the employee may carry out his duties as well as a duty not to discriminate. If reasonable adjustments cannot be made then it may be necessary and acceptable to terminate the employee.

There are certain factors which are likely to be relevant in considering the reasonableness of the decision to dismiss. These include (i) prospects of the employee returning to work and the likelihood of the recurrence of
the illness; (ii) the impact of the absence on the employer’s business; and (iii) the employee’s length of service. Other factors may be relevant in deciding such reasonableness include: (a) the availability of temporary cover, (b) whether an employee has exhausted his sick and vacation pay, (c) the size of the organisation and (d) the administrative consequences of keeping the employee hired. It is best practice is to warn the employee that their termination is being considered and invite them to a meeting to discuss these issues and the medical evidence.

If it is determined that an employee will be terminated, the employer must ensure that proper notice is given to the employee. The relevant notice depends on the contract of employment, or if silent, would depend on the timing of the employee’s pay period with the maximum being one months’ notice. It should also be noted that a notice of termination may not be given to an employee who is on sick leave unless it has been at least four weeks.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
13 Mar 2026

A will trust can keep a home in the family

In Bermuda, a family homestead represents more than financial value; it embodies ancestral heritage and housing security.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Mar 2026

Privacy at Work: What PIPA Means for Bermuda Employers

The Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (PIPA), which came into force on 1 January 2025, represents Bermuda’s first comprehensive date protection regime. The legislation regulates the collection, use, disclosure and storage of personal information with the objective of protecting individuals’ privacy while allowing organisations to use data in a responsible and transparent manner. PIPA applies broadly to organisations operating in Bermuda, including employers. As a result, the employment relationship is one of the contexts in which the practical impact of PIPA is the most significant. Employers routinely process large volumes of personal information relating to employees and job applicants, and PIPA imposes obligations that affect recruitment, workplace monitoring, record-keeping, and disciplinary processes.

IWD website preview
9 Mar 2026

International Women’s Day 2026 Roundtable: Rights. Justice. Action. For all women and girls.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Dispute Resolution
4 Mar 2026

Bermuda: An Overview of Insurance: Contentious

There has been a recent increase in policyholder disputes involving coverage challenges by (re)insurers in the context of Bermuda high-value, excess-of-loss policies. This is, in part, due to Bermuda’s commercial (re)insurers facing a marked and sustained rise in the volume of claims, incurring claims costs globally of BMD1.1 trillion from 2016 through 2024. The massive volume and quantum of claims can be attributed in part to the significance of the Bermuda (re)insurance market in the global economy, as well as Bermuda’s exposure to catastrophic losses caused by natural disasters over this period. Bermuda’s increased exposure to global (re)insurance risks has naturally resulted in an increase in complex claims and coverage disputes.

Employment-and-Immigration
27 Feb 2026

Pay transparency heading Bermuda’s way?

The culture of secrecy with respect to pay traditionally found in workplaces may soon experience a shift, as global lawmakers and governments have enacted or moved toward enacting legislation to mandate greater pay transparency.