‘Senior Executive position’ – What’s in a name?

Published: 21 Jan 2019
Type: Insight

First published in The Bermuda Chamber Of Commerce Newsletter (Chamber Insider) January 2019

Some may not consider the importance of their job title so long as they are being suitably remunerated for the roles that they fill.

However, employers should take special care in ensuring that job titles, particularly for work permit holders, clearly reflect the position and roles carried out by their employees, particularly with respect to the level of seniority. Failing to do so may, amongst other things, delay or jeopardize an employee’s eligibility to obtain a Permanent Resident’s Certificate (PRC).

Pursuant to the Bermuda Immigration and Protection Act 1956 (Immigration Act) and the Economic Development Act 1968 (Economic Development Act) senior executives of eligible companies (each being a designated company) are eligible to obtain a PRC.

In order for a person to be eligible for a PRC, such person must:

(a)   be eligible for exemption from Part V of the Immigration Act under section 5 of the Economic Development Act for at least 10 years, and has either been granted an exemption or made an application which has not been refused;

(b)  be ordinarily resident in Bermuda for a period of at least 10 years; and

(c)   be ordinarily resident in Bermuda during the two years immediately preceding the application.

The relevant section for the purposes of this article, and the section we will focus on, is section (a). Eligibility for an exemption from Part V of the Immigration Act refers to the requirement to obtain a work permit before engaging in gainful occupation in Bermuda (Work Permit Exemption). Pursuant to section 5 of the Economic Development Act, a person in a senior executive position in a designated company is eligible to apply to the Minister for a Work Permit Exemption. Accordingly, eligibility to obtain a PRC depends on, inter alia, whether such employee has been in a “senior executive position” for at least 10 years. In determining an applicant’s eligibility, the Minister will look at the job titles used in the applicant’s work permits throughout those 10 years.

The term “senior executive position” is not defined in the relevant Acts. This is where the risk lies. Whether a title is sufficiently senior depends on the interpretation of that title by the Minister.  As such, while an employee may have been in a senior executive position for the requisite time, the level of seniority may not have been reflected in the employee’s job title. This would likely result in any application for a PRC to be refused on the basis that the application has not been in a “senior executive position” for at least 10 years. Care therefore needs to be taken that the job title accurately reflects the employee’s seniority and work actually undertaken.

A refusal does not necessarily mean the end of the road for the applicant, as it can be appealed and a refusal by the Minister does not bar any future applications. However, any refusal would inevitably result in delays to obtaining a PRC or where a future application is the only option; there is a risk that the applicant’s circumstances may change resulting in the application no longer being eligible.

This note is intended as a high level overview of this topic and there may be a number of other issues which will also require consideration. Legal advice should always be sought on a case by case basis.

Share
More publications
Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.