Regularise encroachments in good time

Published: 15 Jun 2018
Type: Insight

First Published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking, June 2018

An encroachment is the movement of a boundary beyond its legally proper position.


Typically, it is a shock to many Bermudian homeowners that encroachments cannot always be satisfactorily corrected informally between neighbours.

Encroachments can occur, and require correcting, due to historically less accurate surveying devices, intentional or natural movement of a boundary feature, or because of a previous informal agreement between neighbours.

Frustratingly, encroachments are often overlooked until a vendor and purchaser have entered into a sale and purchase agreement. For this reason, professionals recommend that vendors have their lot staked out with a new lot plan produced prior to listing. That way, any encroachment discovered can be corrected, likely well before a sale is due to close.

If an encroachment is only discovered just prior to closing, there may be insufficient time to obtain a planning subdivision by the contractual closing date and the sale could fail, or be delayed by several weeks and possibly with a price reduction.

Should the encroachment be of a small area of little value, parties will often overlook the issue, possibly intending to rectify matters later. However, if the encroachment is for a larger area and perhaps involves a building, or right of way, it is important to formally rectify matters.

A formal subdivision planning consent issued by the Planning Department is required as informal agreements or transfers intended for 21 years or more are void under the Development and Planning Act 1974. This is important to note, as a property is typically a most valuable asset and the valuation is linked to a good and marketable title for a purchaser, or bank (when mortgage financing is involved).

A formal subdivision of land issued by planning is required in Bermuda in the following cases:

Subdividing an existing lot to create two or more smaller lots with a view to subsequently transferring ownership of the lots.

Formalising a boundary encroachment indefinitely.

Granting or releasing a right of way for 21 years or more (often called an easement).

Planning requirements are typically anticipated for subdivision of larger portions of land and approval is typically obtained in good time before any transfer or grant is required.

The focus of today’s column is rectification of boundary encroachments.

The first step towards rectifying an encroachment is a formal boundary survey and preparation of a new deed plan, showing the subdivision particulars, by a qualified surveyor. Surveying fees will be incurred.

The new deed plan is then submitted to planning with a formal application, together with government fees. The application goes before the Development Applications Board and if approved is formally registered and signed off by Government.

Typically, the surveying/planning process takes two to four months, dependent on the level of complexity and the quantity of land involved.

After subdivision planning consent is granted, the registered deed plan is used in the document transferring land or granting the easement. The encroachment is thus corrected and the property should be good and marketable, so restoring proper value and certainty.

Encroachments can be rectified without a planning subdivision, and with no risk of being void under the Act, if corrective arrangements are to last for less than 21 years. However, such arrangements may be unsatisfactory, as not being a permanent fix.

Docks are sometimes found to be encroaching on the Queen’s bottom — the Bermuda seabed that is vested in the Crown, i.e. Bermuda Government. Furthermore, Proclamation GN 407 of 1996 establishes an exclusive economic zone for 200 nautical miles around Bermuda. The proclamation provides that rights exercisable over exclusive economic zone waters, seabed and subsoil, as well as natural resources, are vested in the Crown.

Over time, parts of the seabed have been sold or leased by Government to dock owners. Government policy is to no longer sell seabed; instead, a lease is offered (avoiding need for planning consent) in exchange for a one-time payment.

Additionally, some dock owners have acquired seabed ownership by adverse possession. It is possible to claim adverse possession of seabed, based on a dock having existed for a period of at least 60 years, without objection from Government. Such may be demonstrated, for example, by old photographs, by old plans or by affidavits. A successful adverse possession claim allows ownership of seabed, on which a dock is constructed, without payment to Government.

If purchasing waterfront property including a dock, it is wise to ensure that seabed ownership is regulated and the appropriate conveyance or lease from Government is included with the title deeds. If ownership is unregulated, ensure that the vendor is contracted to:

Obtain appropriate approval from Government prior to closing, or;

Allow for enough funds to be “held back” to cover the costs associated with a government application and the grant of a 21-year lease.

Conversely, a vendor’s net proceeds can be reduced, by the not insignificant amount required, to regularise seabed encroachment.

The moral of the story is to check your boundaries, and ensure that any discovered encroachments are regularised, well before attempting to sell or mortgage your property.

Share
More publications
Dispute Resolution
4 Mar 2026

Bermuda: An Overview of Insurance: Contentious

There has been a recent increase in policyholder disputes involving coverage challenges by (re)insurers in the context of Bermuda high-value, excess-of-loss policies. This is, in part, due to Bermuda’s commercial (re)insurers facing a marked and sustained rise in the volume of claims, incurring claims costs globally of BMD1.1 trillion from 2016 through 2024. The massive volume and quantum of claims can be attributed in part to the significance of the Bermuda (re)insurance market in the global economy, as well as Bermuda’s exposure to catastrophic losses caused by natural disasters over this period. Bermuda’s increased exposure to global (re)insurance risks has naturally resulted in an increase in complex claims and coverage disputes.

Employment-and-Immigration
27 Feb 2026

Pay transparency heading Bermuda’s way?

The culture of secrecy with respect to pay traditionally found in workplaces may soon experience a shift, as global lawmakers and governments have enacted or moved toward enacting legislation to mandate greater pay transparency.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
27 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority: Modern, Thoughtful and Competitive

The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) has signaled a clear direction for the future of insurance supervision in Bermuda by the release of its latest Notice on Regulatory Burden Reduction for Better Policyholder Outcomes (Notice).

Appleby-Website-Banking-and-Asset-Finance-1905px-x-1400px
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – Banking

Bermuda is not considered an international banking center and only banks licensed by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) under the Banks and Deposit Companies Act 1999 (BDCA) are entitled to undertake banking businesses in or from Bermuda. As banking is defined as deposit taking (as opposed to lending), international banks are generally able to lend to Bermuda-based borrowers subject to applicable restrictions relating to carrying on business in Bermuda.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – Insurance (Captives)

Bermuda is one of the leading captive insurance markets in the world with over 600 registered captive insurers writing an impressive ~$30 billion of annual gross written premiums.

Appleby-Website-Corporate-Practice
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – General Corporate

The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA), an independent body that has been in existence since 1969, is an integrated regulator and supervisor responsible for the licensing, supervision and regulation of financial institutions in Bermuda. The BMA’s mandate includes entities conducting insurance, deposit taking, investment and trust business. The BMA conducts risk-based supervision and enforcement, including enforcing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing standards. The BMA sets prudential rules, issues codes of conduct and devises industry guidance to ensure the jurisdiction adheres to international standards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – Insurance (Commercial)

The Bermuda Monetary Authority’s (BMA) 2026 Business Plan (Plan) outlines continued strengthening of Bermuda’s position as a leading global insurance and reinsurance jurisdiction.

Technology-and-Innovation-1024x576
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – FinTech

By any serious measure, Bermuda’s FinTech strategy for 2026 is not incremental. It is deliberate. It is disciplined. And it is designed to position Bermuda not as a follower in digital finance — but as a standard-setter.

Appleby-Website-Regulatory-Practice
19 Feb 2026

Bermuda Monetary Authority 2026 Business Plan: Overview & Expertise – Regulatory

Bermuda operates a highly integrated regulatory architecture under which the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) exercises consolidated oversight across insurance, banking, investment business and funds, trusts, corporate service providers, money services and digital asset activity. While the statutory framework has long been risk-based, the previous five years marks a clear evolution in supervisory practices. The BMA moved decisively beyond technical compliance and periodic reporting toward an emphasis on supervisory judgement, governance outcomes and system-wide resilience.

Dispute Resolution
17 Feb 2026

Bermuda: A Dispute Resolution Overview

Bermuda continues to be an established offshore disputes jurisdiction, supported by a specialist commercial court and the increasing use of arbitration to resolve complex commercial and private wealth disputes.