Probationary Periods – Importance of Dates when Considering Extensions

Published: 5 Aug 2019
Type: Insight

First Published in The Bermuda Chamber Of Commerce Newsletter (Chamber Insider), August 2019

New employment is not always a smooth process. The employer and employee both need to adjust to new conditions and dynamics. Employees must learn new duties and methods of operation, while employers must learn the work habits, strengths and weaknesses of the new employee. Probationary periods are helpful to both parties as a ‘getting to know you’ phase in what most hope to be a mutually beneficial relationship. However, no relationship is perfect.

In Jerome Robinson (1609 VIP Executive Limited) and Kaenori Burchall (Robinson v Burchall): Burchall brought claims for being unfairly dismissed. Robinson defended citing the authority to dismiss an employee for any reason during the probation period. The Hon. Assistant Justice Pettingill (Pettingill AJ) noted that “if the end of the contractual probation period is approaching and an employer is not yet sure whether to dismiss the employee or not, the probation period can be extended if the contract includes an express right for the employer to do so or if the employee agrees to an extension.” Probation periods can be extended if an employer believes an employee has not reached a satisfactory threshold. Ultimately though, under Bermuda law, an “employer is legally entitled to terminate the contract of employment for any reason without notice in accordance with section 19 of the Employment Act 2000 (Act). But what an employer cannot do is extend the probationary period after the initial probation has expired.

In Robinson v Burchall, Pettingill AJ stated that “the law on probationary periods is quite clear…and an employee cannot be placed on a probation period once an initial period has expired, which was for a month in this instance, without the employer giving prior notice of the intention to extend the probation, even in circumstances where such period is agreed as it was in this case…. s.19 in setting out probation for a “new employee” does not give statutory flexibility to reinstate a period of probation at a later date in time as a convenience to the employer. The reason being obvious as it would give a “license” to employers to impose a probationary period as they wished and obviate the more stringent provisions of the Employment Act required for full time employees.” If the employer fails to exercise any right to extend the probation period before its expiration, the employee automatically passes the probation and can no longer be dismissed without cause.

Pettingill AJ ruled that, as Ms. Burchall was not terminated on any of the grounds for unfair dismissal noted in s. 28 of the Act, and was in fact summarily dismissed by s.19, the termination was ‘wrongful’ “as she was a de-facto employee and should have been given a written warning and appropriate notice in accordance with s.24 and s.27 of the Act if there were issues with her conduct.”

Robinson v Burchall is a cautionary tale for both employers and employees when it comes to managing probationary periods. We would always advise that an employer should take care when considering extending an employee’s probationary period. If there is any doubt, then advice should be sought prior to the probationary period expiring.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
13 Mar 2026

A will trust can keep a home in the family

In Bermuda, a family homestead represents more than financial value; it embodies ancestral heritage and housing security.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Mar 2026

Privacy at Work: What PIPA Means for Bermuda Employers

The Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (PIPA), which came into force on 1 January 2025, represents Bermuda’s first comprehensive date protection regime. The legislation regulates the collection, use, disclosure and storage of personal information with the objective of protecting individuals’ privacy while allowing organisations to use data in a responsible and transparent manner. PIPA applies broadly to organisations operating in Bermuda, including employers. As a result, the employment relationship is one of the contexts in which the practical impact of PIPA is the most significant. Employers routinely process large volumes of personal information relating to employees and job applicants, and PIPA imposes obligations that affect recruitment, workplace monitoring, record-keeping, and disciplinary processes.

IWD website preview
9 Mar 2026

International Women’s Day 2026 Roundtable: Rights. Justice. Action. For all women and girls.

As we recognise International Women’s Day 2025, we are reminded that gender equality is not just a vision – it’s a call to action.

Dispute Resolution
4 Mar 2026

Bermuda: An Overview of Insurance: Contentious

There has been a recent increase in policyholder disputes involving coverage challenges by (re)insurers in the context of Bermuda high-value, excess-of-loss policies. This is, in part, due to Bermuda’s commercial (re)insurers facing a marked and sustained rise in the volume of claims, incurring claims costs globally of BMD1.1 trillion from 2016 through 2024. The massive volume and quantum of claims can be attributed in part to the significance of the Bermuda (re)insurance market in the global economy, as well as Bermuda’s exposure to catastrophic losses caused by natural disasters over this period. Bermuda’s increased exposure to global (re)insurance risks has naturally resulted in an increase in complex claims and coverage disputes.

Employment-and-Immigration
27 Feb 2026

Pay transparency heading Bermuda’s way?

The culture of secrecy with respect to pay traditionally found in workplaces may soon experience a shift, as global lawmakers and governments have enacted or moved toward enacting legislation to mandate greater pay transparency.