Preparing for a virtual AGM in Bermuda

Published: 22 Oct 2020
Type: Insight

First Published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking, October 2020

As the global Covid-19 pandemic continues, remote working is becoming the new business normal.

The necessities of conducting day-to-day business operations remotely are educating large swathes of the public in the use of virtual meeting platforms. In addition, the infrastructure underpinning virtual meetings is rapidly expanding and being adopted by both individuals and enterprises.

This shift to a more flexible working and meeting culture is unlikely to completely fall away once we emerge from the current pandemic; we expect to see more companies embracing hybrid or virtual annual general meetings on a go forward basis.

A hybrid AGM is a physical meeting with remote electronic participation. In comparison, a virtual AGM is solely held electronically with no physical component.

While purely virtual AGMs are not uncommon in the United States, they are relatively new elsewhere.

This article focuses on the legal and practical aspects of a virtual AGM in Bermuda (which apply equally to remote participation in a hybrid AGM).

There are two overarching hurdles to holding a virtual AGM: determining whether the company’s incorporating statute and constitutional documents permit it, and determining the practical aspects of doing so.

In the case of virtual AGMs, Bermuda’s Companies Act 1981 states that, unless a company’s byelaws specify otherwise, an AGM may be held electronically or by such other communication facilities as permit all participants to “communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously, and participation in such meeting shall constitute presence in person at such meeting”.

Unlike some other jurisdictions that specify that participants must be able to “speak to” or “hear” each other, Bermuda’s legislation uses the broader term “communicate”.

This allows companies greater flexibility in organising and running their virtual AGM — for example, it’s likely that a company may validly mute all participants as long as each may virtually “raise a hand” to be unmuted for a question or submit their questions via a chat function.

Similarly, in our experience, most company byelaws permit virtual AGMs conditional on the technology providing shareholders as a whole a reasonable opportunity to participate (including functionality that allows shareholders to hear, be heard, vote and ask questions of management).

In a virtual AGM, all the usual corporate governance requirements relating to quorum, notice periods, proxies, documents tabled and counting and announcing the results of the vote still apply and must be met.

Fortunately, the Companies Act provides that electronically participating in a virtual AGM constitutes presence in person at such meeting — foregoing any potential issues with electronic participants counting towards quorum.

Even for companies that have included provisions in their byelaws permitting them to hold virtual meetings, there may be other statutory or regulatory hurdles (applicable listing rules or guidance from proxy advisers) that prevent them from doing so.

Once a company establishes that it is permitted to hold a virtual AGM, it must ensure that it is well structured and orderly. Some key considerations are set out below.

Preparation is key. The company should consider all logistic, AGM facilitating technologies, security of electronic communications, and publish instructions on how to access the virtual AGM platform. The company may wish to use a virtual service provider that specialises in virtual AGMs to host the meeting and request that the service provider offer practice facilities or tutorials for less technically savvy shareholders.

Shareholders and the market should be put on notice as early as possible prior to the virtual AGM.

Notice and proxy materials should include: the link for any web-based services provided for the meeting; dial-in details for any telephone-based services, including toll-free or local call rate numbers etc.; the correct time zone and all access codes; clear advice on the technology and internet connectivity needed for full participation; all protocols/rules of procedure (e.g. poll voting); and encouragement to shareholders to submit electronic proxy votes as early as possible.

The company should implement secure authentication measures to identify attendees (e.g. unique password) and verify that a quorum is present, maintained and voting throughout the meeting.

Further, it should establish how questions will be fielded (e.g. pre-submitted or live via text or chat, time limits on questions or responses) to ensure that shareholders have a reasonable opportunity to participate in the virtual AGM and that there is adequate debate. The virtual nature of the meeting cannot be seen to muzzle shareholders, filter or exclude shareholder questions or otherwise jeopardise shareholders’ ability to put proposals to management and thereby render management less accountable to shareholders.

The company should also open the meeting 10 to 15 minutes prior to commencement to allow a prompt start as well as extra time to deal with any technology issues.

Finally, in order to ensure that the meeting runs smoothly, the chairman should only ask for points of dissent for non-contentious matters, have a script, keep discussions focused, curtail the length of meeting, deal with important agenda items first to maintain participants’ attention, and consider short comfort breaks for long meetings.

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
13 Mar 2026

A will trust can keep a home in the family

In Bermuda, a family homestead represents more than financial value; it embodies ancestral heritage and housing security.

Appleby-Website-Employment-and-Immigration
12 Mar 2026

Privacy at Work: What PIPA Means for Bermuda Employers

The Personal Information Protection Act 2016 (PIPA), which came into force on 1 January 2025, represents Bermuda’s first comprehensive date protection regime. The legislation regulates the collection, use, disclosure and storage of personal information with the objective of protecting individuals’ privacy while allowing organisations to use data in a responsible and transparent manner. PIPA applies broadly to organisations operating in Bermuda, including employers. As a result, the employment relationship is one of the contexts in which the practical impact of PIPA is the most significant. Employers routinely process large volumes of personal information relating to employees and job applicants, and PIPA imposes obligations that affect recruitment, workplace monitoring, record-keeping, and disciplinary processes.