Outsourcing considerations for Bermuda insurers

Published: 8 May 2026
Type: Insight

As Bermuda insurers engage with third-party service providers to support their business functions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has clarified its regulatory expectations surrounding outsourcing arrangements and operational resilience.


This column outlines a high-level overview of the regulatory, governance, and practical considerations for Bermuda insurers as they assess, implement and oversee outsourcing arrangements.

Key takeaways from this column:

  • Accountability and oversight remain with the board
  • Insurers must have a clear framework in place to identify, assess and manage risk
  • Due diligence must be undertaken when considering material outsourcing arrangements

The Insurance Act 1978, as amended, Insurance Code of Conduct 2022, the Operational Resilience and Outsourcing Code 2025 and the accompanying Guidance Notes form the regulatory framework for governance and outsourcing arrangements for insurers.

The Insurance Code of Conduct applies on a proportional basis to all insurers, and the Outsourcing Code applies on a proportional basis to commercial insurers and innovative insurers (as well as other relevant entities as set out therein).

Insurers are required to have procedures and processes for identifying, measuring and assessing (among other things) outsourcing risk and third-party oversight. Although functions may be outsourced externally or internally to other affiliated entities, boards must ensure oversight and clear accountability as if the outsourced functions were performed internally and subject to the insurer’s own governance standards and internal controls.

Insurers with higher risk profiles, based on their businesses’ nature, scale and complexity, will require a more comprehensive governance and risk management framework to conduct business in a sound and prudent manner.

Certain outsourcing arrangements may trigger notification obligations to the BMA where they amount to a material change pursuant to the Insurance Act.

Where an outsourcing arrangement could materially impact the risk profile, policyholder interests, financial conditions or compliance with statutory duties, notification to the BMA may be required as part of the insurer’s ongoing supervisory engagement.

While the Insurance Code of Conduct does not expressly define outsourcing or material outsourcing, the Outsourcing Code provides the following definitions as guidance:

Outsourcing: an arrangement in which the relevant entity uses a third party (ie, the outsourcing service provider), to perform activities on an ongoing basis that are integral to the provision of services by the relevant entity that could otherwise be undertaken by that relevant entity.

Material outsourcing: an outsourcing arrangement where an important activity, as determined by senior management of the relevant entity, has been outsourced to a third party.

An activity will generally be regarded as material if such activity would materially impact:

  • Business operations, reputation or financial performance
  • Ability to manage risk
  • Compliance with applicable Bermuda laws
  • Clients and policyholders

The board retains responsibility and accountability for operational resilience and outsourcing oversight. The responsibility is on the board to regularly review (at least annually) and approve all material outsourcing arrangements.

Boards must conduct due diligence and assess the impact or potential impact of material outsourcing arrangements prior to engagement. The board must also ensure that there are clear policies and procedures in place, based on the proportionality principle, to adhere to the obligations set out in the regulatory framework in order to effectively manage risk, as applicable.

Such due diligence should include — but is not limited to — evaluating whether the service provider has the following in place:

  • The quantity and quality of staff with the requisite skills and experience to effectively deliver the outsourced activities
  • The relevant technology, cybersecurity arrangements, operational infrastructure and financial capacity to undertake the outsourcing arrangement effectively and efficiently
  • Appropriate information and data security to protect any and all confidential information
  • An appropriate risk management framework and controls to ensure that risks associated with the outsourcing are effectively managed
  • The ability to maintain appropriate internal controls and meet regulatory requirements
  • An appropriate business continuity plan and disaster recovery plan
  • The ability to provide access to all documents and data relating to the outsourced activity, its auditors and its competent authority

Insurers should always ensure that outsourcing does not impede obligations imposed by the BMA or obligations to policyholders.

First Published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking column, May 2026

Share
More publications
Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.