On board: liability and indemnity

Published: 17 May 2018
Type: Insight

First Published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking, May 2018

Now more than ever, company directors must understand and appreciate not only the duties and obligations that accompany their role but also the exoneration and indemnity mechanisms available to them and the limits to such provisions.

That is because international standards of corporate integrity and transparency are growing features of cross jurisdictional financial initiatives. The result is an increased level of legal and regulatory compliance and accountability for companies, which must adapt their practices in response to the added responsibility.

In connection with the global effort to support effective levels of managerial transparency, the Bermuda Proceeds of Crime Amendment Act 2016 was amended recently resulting in the insertion of a provision for a register of directors in the Companies Act 1981 (Companies Act). The amendment requires that a Bermuda registered company file with the Registrar of Companies (Registrar) a list of its directors to be maintained by the Registrar and kept available for public inspection.

A company’s register of directors must reflect a complete and current record of its directors and will include the full name and address of individual directors or the company name and registered office address in the case of corporate directors. The amendment is in connection with Bermuda’s compliance with the current Financial Action Task Force (FATF) requirements and recommendations. FATF is an inter-governmental body that aims to set regulatory standards and develop procedural measures to counter money laundering, terrorist financing and other misuses of the international financial system.

Ultimately, directors have certain duties that are owed to the company as a whole. In exercising such duties, directors are responsible for, among other things, ensuring that the company operates soundly and within its applicable legal framework. In doing so, directors must be fully informed and free from conflicts (unless otherwise disclosed and where they may continue to act in accordance with a company’s bye-laws) when making decisions in respect of the company so as to avoid being held liable for not satisfying their duty of care or acting with an improper motive. The Companies Act provides for certain circumstances where directors can be liable for civil and criminal penalties and the increased scrutiny on companies and their operational responsibilities makes it vital that directors be aware of and understand these statutory liabilities.

Statutory liabilities under the Companies Act include loss suffered by subscribers of shares in connection with untrue statements made in a prospectus; loss, damages or costs suffered by a prospective shareholder where a director knowingly contravenes, permits or authorises the contravention of provisions of the Companies Act relating to the allotment of shares; and receiving loans from a company without the approval of the shareholders.

Certain other statutory liabilities apply to companies in liquidation including failing to disclose or deliver assets to a liquidator; falsification of books and records; and knowingly conducting business with the intent to defraud creditors.

Statutory protections can be afforded to directors in limited circumstances via indemnity provisions and insurance. The Companies Act permits a company to exempt and indemnify its directors by including in the company’s bye-laws or in any contract or other arrangement between the company and the director a provision for exemption from, or indemnification in respect of, any loss arising or liability attaching to the director arising in respect of any negligence, default, breach of any duty or breach of trust.

However, such indemnity provisions are limited and will not apply to any liability attaching to a director arising in respect of any fraud or dishonesty.  Subject to the limitation above, this exemption will cover all liabilities, loss, damage or expense and may also cover any liabilities that the director incurs defending any proceedings where relief is granted, where the director is acquitted or where the director is awarded a favourable judgement.

Additionally, companies are permitted to purchase a policy of insurance for directors providing protection against any liability incurred as a result of a director’s conduct and in particular for failure to exercise their duties of care, diligence and skill as well as any liability arising from any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of a director with the exception of contraventions connected to fraud or dishonesty. Any supplementary limitations on the scope of the insurance will be found within the policy.

Although such protections and safeguards are available to directors, it is important to note that they are not limitless. Further, given the increased initiative on a global level to implement sound corporate and financial policies and procedures, there is a greater public demand for good corporate governance, transparency and responsibility on the part of management.

Directors should therefore take a proactive approach to exercising their duties given the current impact of international standards of governance on financial centres and companies.

locations

Bermuda

services

Corporate

types

Insight

Share
More publications
Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
24 Mar 2026

Navigating Bermuda’s New Recovery Planning Requirements: A Roadmap for Commercial Insurers

On 20 March 2026, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) issued an updated Guidance Note for Recovery Planning Requirements (Guidance Note). The Guidance Note assists Bermuda commercial insurers’ compliance with the obligations set out in the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Recovery Plan) Rules 2024 (Rules), which became operative on 1 May 2025.