M&A transactions under PIPA (Bermuda)

Published: 14 Apr 2025
Type: Insight

Mergers and business acquisitions are among the many different types of business transactions that require the disclosure and use of personal information between the prospective parties.


The types of personal information that may be necessary to disclose for due diligence, valuation and integration planning purposes may include customer information, employee information — including employment agreements — obligations or liabilities owed to individual third parties, and other human resource records, including dispute resolution files.

Normally, the initial stages of any M&A discussion between the parties will begin with, and will be governed by, some sort of commencement agreement.

That may be as simple as a confidentiality or non-disclosure agreement, or it may take the form of an exclusivity agreement, a terms sheet or a binding memorandum of understanding.

Regardless of form, the kick-off agreement for an M&A transaction will usually have three features that are directly related to the necessary disclosure of personal information in an M&A transaction: to recognise the proprietary and confidential nature of all provided information; that such information can only be used for the sole purpose of the transaction; and that, if the transaction does not proceed, all such information must, without qualification, either be destroyed or returned to the disclosing party.

Those preliminary engagement norms for M&A transactions are well addressed by the Personal Information Protection Act 2016, which came into force on January 1, to ensure that any personal information that is necessary for an M&A transaction can, based on certain conditions, be shared between the parties without the consent of the subject individuals.

In that regard, section 46 of Pipa provides that an organisation may, both leading up to the transaction and for its completion, use personal information for the purposes of a business transaction without the consent of the individuals, where the parties have an agreement that restricts such use for the purposes of the transaction and otherwise only for the purpose for which it was originally collected, and if the transaction does not proceed, all such information must either be destroyed or returned to the disclosing party.

Therefore, any contractual qualification to Pipa’s required agreement provisions — eg, that may allow disclosed personal information to not be destroyed or returned, and to be held by the recipient for reasons other than for the business transaction — may not permit any personal information to be shared with the other party to the transaction.

Pipa also provides an additional disclosure condition whereby the disclosing party must determine that such a disclosure is necessary for the proposed M&A transaction to be considered, proceeded with, or to be completed. Such determinations can be internally documented by either an executive of the disclosing party or by its privacy officer.

Should the disclosing party to the M&A transaction wish to secure the consent of any subject individuals for any purpose beyond the M&A transaction, Pipa provides that “…nothing in this section (restricts) a party to a business transaction from obtaining the consent of a person to (use) personal information… for purposes beyond the purposes for which the party obtained the personal information”.

It is interesting to note that the business transaction allowances in Pipa do not apply where the primary purpose, objective or result of the proposed transaction is “the purchase, sale, lease, transfer, disposal or disclosure of personal information”. However, even though Pipa only applies to “every organisation that uses personal information in Bermuda”, the words “purchase”, “sale”, and “lease” are not included in Pipa’s definition of “use”.

Parties to an M&A transaction must also consider whether any personal information that is being disclosed for the purpose of that transaction is being transferred to an overseas third party.

If so, then at least one of the export allowance options of section 15 of Pipa must be met before any such export from Bermuda is permitted. That is also true where the due diligence “data room” is located outside of Bermuda.

Those engaging in M&A transactions should ensure that their preliminary engagement agreements include the above noted provisions to allow the disclosure of personal information for the proposed transaction.

Standard form M&A engagement agreements, including NDAs, may need to be reviewed and updated to reflect Pipa’s grounds to allow such transactional use and possibly export from Bermuda.

Further, all merged or amalgamated entities that use personal information in Bermuda should ensure that the data protection policies and procedures for the combined organisation are revised for consistency, particularly with regard to the combined organisation’s compliance “measures and policies” and privacy notices.

The implications of Pipa for the use of personal information will have to be considered at each step along all M&A transactions.

First Published in The Royal Gazette, Legally Speaking column, April 2025

Share
More publications
Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
8 May 2026

Outsourcing considerations for Bermuda insurers

As Bermuda insurers engage with third-party service providers to support their business functions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority has clarified its regulatory expectations surrounding outsourcing arrangements and operational resilience.

Economic Substance
27 Apr 2026

Economic substance regime now falls under Cita

Recent amendments to Bermuda’s economic substance regime have transferred regulatory responsibility from the Registrar of Companies to the Corporate Income Tax Agency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice
22 Apr 2026

Regulation, Regulation, Regulation

The article discusses updates to global trust guidance and regulation, as well as beneficial ownership and the regulatory burden on trustees that comes with increased transparency.

Appleby-Website-Private-Client-and-Trusts-Practice-1905px-x-1400px
15 Apr 2026

Purpose trusts: Bermuda’s answer to modern asset structuring

Purpose trusts represent a notable development in modern trust law, particularly within offshore financial jurisdictions such as Bermuda. Unlike traditional private trusts, which are established for the benefit of identifiable beneficiaries, purpose trusts are created to achieve specific objectives or purposes. Historically, common law jurisdictions were reluctant to recognise such arrangements due to the absence of beneficiaries capable of enforcing the trust. However, legislative reforms in Bermuda have significantly expanded the scope of trust law by expressly validating noncharitable purpose trusts. Through the enactment of the Trusts (Special Provisions) Act 1989 (‘the 1989 Act’), Bermuda introduced a statutory framework that allows trusts to exist for defined purposes, provided certain legal requirements are satisfied. This innovation has made Bermuda a leading jurisdiction for the establishment of purpose trusts, particularly in the fields of international finance, corporate structuring and private wealth management. This article examines the legal foundations of purpose trusts under Bermuda law, focusing on their historical development, statutory framework, requirements for validity, enforcement mechanisms and practical applications.

Website-Code-Bermuda-1
10 Apr 2026

Bermuda Regulatory Update – Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026

On 31 March 2026, the Economic Substance Amendment Act 2026 and the Economic Substance Amendment Regulations 2026 (together, the “2026 Amendments”) came into force, enacting changes to the Economic Substance Act 2018 (“ES Act”) and Economic Substance Regulations 2018.

ICLG Fintech 21 cover
10 Apr 2026

Digital asset developments and Bermuda’s regulatory readiness

While frightening to some, “finance bros” and “tech bros” are now wearing the same gilets as traditional finance products and structures are being infused with digital asset adaptation.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
1 Apr 2026

Q1’26 Suggests Cat Bond Issuance Could Reach $20bn Again, Private ILS & Sidecar Surge to Continue

It’s been an exceptionally busy start to the year for the catastrophe bond sector, with Q1’26 officially becoming the second highest Q1 on record in terms of total catastrophe bond issuance, which indicates that 2026 could end up reaching the $20 billion+ milestone once again, Brad Adderley, Managing Partner at law firm Appleby has said.

Trust Disputes
27 Mar 2026

Privy Council decision in X Trusts – redefining the role of the protector

On 19 March 2026, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) delivered its long-awaited judgment regarding the role of a fiduciary protector in the administration of a trust (A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents) [2026] UKPC 11, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Bermuda). The decision of the JCPC was unanimous, with the judgment being given by Lords Briggs and Richards.

Appleby-Website-Insurance-and-Reinsurance
26 Mar 2026

Latin American risks and the Bermuda market

Bermuda’s decades-long efforts to welcome Latin American risks to the island’s re/insurance market have borne fruit in the form of the many LatAm captive insurers that have become domiciled here.